Afrorhytida kraussi oraria, Herbert & Moussalli, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.051.0101 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/110B87C2-FFDB-FFB5-D78C-FB2CFD40FB39 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Afrorhytida kraussi oraria |
status |
subsp. nov. |
Afrorhytida kraussi oraria View in CoL subsp. n.
Figs 55F View Fig , 63 View Fig , 64E View Fig , F, 65A–C View Fig
Etymology: From orarius (Latin) , of the coast; referring to its association with coastal fynbos and dune strandveld habitats.
Identification ( Fig. 65 View Fig ): For general description see Afrorhytida k. kraussi above. Shell shape and sculpture resembling A. k. kraussi , but with distinctive coloration (see below); protoconch smaller (diameter 2.5–3.0 mm) and shell thicker. Does not appear to attain as large a size as the nominotypical subspecies (diameter of largest specimens 23.1 and 28.4 respectively), but adult size evidently varies considerably in the latter.
Periostracum very thin, pale buff, not evident in most specimens; underlying shell mostly whitish with apical region frequently darker, pinkish purple to maroon; last adult whorl often with occasional, irregular, purplish or maroon-brown axial bands, particularly behind outer lip of adult. Shell also sparsely pock-marked with small, dark flecks, these often associated with small growth imperfections; interior of aperture buffish in fresh specimens, the darker subterminal band, if present, visible through shell.
Dimensions: Holotype, diameter 22.3 mm, height 13.3 mm; largest specimen ( NMSA W3297 About NMSA ), diameter 23.1 mm, height 13.3 mm; H:D of adults 0.56–0.64 (N=12).
Living animal (data available for only one specimen) ( Fig. 55F View Fig ): Head-foot coloration similar to that of typical A. k. kraussi , but somewhat darker maroon-brown, very dark dorsally; pedal margin tinged with orange; mantle edge similarly maroon-brown; lung wall with some irregular dark pigmentation, mostly tracking underlying blood vessels.
Radula ( Figs 64E–F View Fig ): As in A. k. kraussi .
Distal genitalia: All live-taken material immature.
Holotype ( Figs 65A–C View Fig ): SOUTH AFRICA: W. Cape: De Hoop Nat. Res. (34.450°S: 20.383°E), 60 m, W. Sirgel, don. i/1999 ( NMSA V6780 About NMSA /T2361). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: SOUTH AFRICA: W. Cape: De Hoop Nat. Res. (34.47512°S: 20.51969°E), coastal dune scrub, in leaf-litter, A. Moussalli & D. Stuart-Fox, 24/ii/2005 ( NMSA W3292 About NMSA /T2363, 1 juvenile specimen; W3297/ T2362, 8 adult specimens, 2 juveniles; ELM D15857 View Materials , 1 specimen); De Hoop Nat. Res., around Koppie Alleen (34.4667°S: 20.5167°E), ground-dwelling in strandveld, A. Wood, 22/viii/1994 ( NMSA W5776 About NMSA / T2364, 2 specimens) GoogleMaps .
Distribution ( Fig. 63 View Fig ): A narrow-range endemic; known only from the De Hoop Nature Reserve, W. Cape, South Africa, at altitudes of <100 m.
Habitat: Recorded only from De Hoop limestone fynbos and Overberg dune strandveld (cf. Mucina & Rutherford 2006); in sandy soil beneath forbs, shrubs and bushes.
Notes: The considerable degree to which Afrorhytida k. oraria differs in shell characters from the nominotypical subspecies would traditionally result in it being considered a distinct species. However, in the analysis of molecular data undertaken by Moussalli et al. (2009), this De Hoop material clustered within the broader assemblage of material considered to represent the A. kraussi complex. Its radula too is indistinguishable from that of members of this complex.Although this assemblage exhibits considerable genetic diversity and may ultimately be shown to be an aggregate of sibling taxa, with the exception of specimens from De Hoop, we have been unable to identify any consistent spatially or genetically correlated patterns in the morphological variation evident. However, since this De Hoop material is clearly conchologically distinct, we consider it merits nomenclatural recognition as a diagnosable entity, ranked for the present as a subspecies. We are aware, however, that some of the conchological characters of this coastal lineage may relate to environmental conditions, particularly edaphic characters (calcium-rich soils) and this is a topic requiring further study.
Conservation: Afrorhytida k. oraria is evidently a taxon of restricted range, but it occurs in a surprisingly poorly sampled area and additional survey work is needed in order to obtain a clearer picture of its distribution.Although currently known only from De Hoop Nature Reserve, the coastal limestone habitat, which it evidently favours, extends considerably beyond the confines of this reserve in the broader Bredasdorp–Stilbaai area. The taxon may thus have a somewhat less restricted distribution than the available data indicate. A meaningful assessment of its threat status must await further information, but this notwithstanding, potential threats are evident, particularly habitat transformation due to the invasion of exotic Acacia species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |