Dicranodromia danielae Ng & McLay, 2005
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1072.72978 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/111027E9-0561-55B8-BCCC-E1B87C2DEB16 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Dicranodromia danielae Ng & McLay, 2005 |
status |
|
Dicranodromia danielae Ng & McLay, 2005
Figure 12 View Figure 12
Dicranodromia danielae Ng & McLay, 2005: 40, figs 1-4; Ng and Naruse 2007: 47, fig. 3c; Ng et al. 2008: 39.
Material examined.
Philippines: holotype ovigerous ♀ (broken, 10.8 × 14.2 mm), Balicasag Island, Panglao, Bohol, Visayas , in tangle nets, ca. 200-300 m, coll. local shell fishermen, 2 Mar. 2004 (ZRC 2005.0094) .
Remarks.
The broken holotype female was re-examined and some characters need to be added or amended from Ng and McLay (2005). Ng and Naruse (2007: fig. 3c) had already noted that the P5 dactylus has a distinct spine on the extensor margin (Fig. 12F, G View Figure 12 ); but in addition, the P5 propodus has three spines on the outer surface (Fig. 12G View Figure 12 ). The P2 and P3 meri were described being unarmed but this is not correct. The extensor margin has low spines while the flexor margin has a row of slender spines partially covered by the dense stiff setae (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). In addition, the basal antennal article is relatively short with the anteroexternal tooth long and subequal in length to the article (Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ). In addition, the epistome of this species is unusual in that the distal part is strongly spinose, with the median lateral part possessing a sharp anteriorly directed tooth; and the rostrum consists of two lateral and one median slender spinules (Fig. 12B, C View Figure 12 ). The merus of the third maxilliped is distinctive, being strongly spinose, with the inner margin lined with strong spines; the exopod is essentially unarmed (Fig. 12I View Figure 12 ).
Some of the characters of D. danielae resemble the male specimen 9.7 × 14.0 mm from Uraga Strait in Japan (35°4.833'N, 139°38.3'E) which Guinot (1995: 207, fig. 11b) referred to " Dicranodromia aff. doederleini ". She described the carapace, proepistome, antennae, antennules, buccal frame, ventral surfaces and merus of the third maxilliped are being more spiny than typical D. doederleini even though the outer surface of the chela was smooth. The more spinous features of the specimen (notably the ventral surfaces, antennae, epistome and third maxillipeds), resemble the condition in D. danielae , but whether the flexor margin of the pereiopods of the specimen was also spinous was not stated. In addition, the carapace of D. danielae is less spinous compared to that figured by Guinot (1995: fig. 11b) for her " Dicranodromia aff. doederleini ". It would appear that this Japanese specimen is a species close to, but probably different from, D. danielae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dicranodromia danielae Ng & McLay, 2005
Ng, Peter K. L. & Yang, Chien-Hui 2021 |
Dicranodromia danielae
Ng & McLay 2005 |