Polyzosteria yingina, Henry & Cameron & Smolenski & Mcquillan, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4926.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3AF255EA-2C21-4DCD-AD73-B8CC6CFED3BE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4545992 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/130C843D-9C33-FF9C-FF34-FA0EFC78F9FB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polyzosteria yingina |
status |
sp. nov. |
Polyzosteria yingina sp. nov. Henry (2020)
Zoobank name link
( Figure 4–6 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )
Diagnosis. Medium-sized, oval, convex, apterous; macroscopically smooth and uniformly coloured above excepting a non-metallic orange margin to the cerci. Upper surfaces dull metallic bronze but sometimes dark and matt. Ventral surface shining bronze and reddish brown with pale coxal border and process’.
Description. Measurements (mm). Length, Pronotum Length/Width, Width, Hind Tibiae. ♂(n=20) L 21.4–30.3; PL 6.8 – 8.9 ; PW 10 – 16.5 ; W 16.5–19.1; HT 9.1–10.1; ♀ (n=25) L 26.9–36.5; PL 7.3 – 9.1 ; PW 14.6 – 17 ; W 18.2–21.5; HT 9.5–11.1.
Exoskeleton is microscopically pitted throughout, pits with minute translucent scales above ( Figure 3E View FIGURE 3 ) and hairs below; scales are very loosely attached so wear and tear may explain their absence on many specimens. Vertex almost hidden from above, shining bronze. Ocelli indistinguishable. Vertex broadly flat, frons domed between concave antennal pits. Antennae are dark, bases brownish red, segments minutely haired with a ring of setae around the widest part. Clypeus and labrum are dark, each with a pale distal border. Labrum is deeply lobed around the notch. Palps are dark and densely haired ( Figure 4B, D View FIGURE 4 ). Dorsal surface colour is dull metallic bronze, sometimes with green highlights though can also be entirely dark and matt, always excepting the rim of the cerci which are bright orange and matt ( Fig 5D View FIGURE 5 ). Texture is microscopically pitted and finely, unevenly nodular. These high points (and overlaps of tergites) are often smoother and shinier. Peripheral edges of dorsal segments are rolled and smooth. Paired, large and smooth stigmatic dots are obvious on each thoracic and abdominal segment, excepting T1,T8,T9 and T10 ( Figure 4A, C View FIGURE 4 ). A small, brush-like structure on the medial anterior margin of T1, usually obscured by the metanotum, has been observed in living males ( Richards and Spencer 2019). This ‘hair tuft’ is presumed to be involved in evaporation of pheromone secretions ( Mackerras 1965). Tergite T8, T9 and T10 are bounded by the projected angles of T7 and T10 also by the flattened, oblanceolate cerci. This species is sexually dimorphic. In males T10 is roughly oblong though slightly concave with slightly acute distal angles ( Figure 4A View FIGURE 4 , 3D View FIGURE 3 ). In the female, T10 is half-oval and convex with a peaked midline ( Figure 4C View FIGURE 4 ), adapted for clamping the ootheca ( Rentz 2014, Richards and Spencer 2019). Legs; tibiae, tops of tarsi and coxae-proximally are shining bronze; coxa-distally, the trochanter and femur are shining reddish brown. Coxal border and processes pale and femora with pale knee. Tibiae flat, biseriately spined with a fringe of hairs on the proximal edge. Tarsal claws light brown with dark tips. All spines yellow with dark points. Underside of thoracic segments shining bronze to greenish-blue. Anterior sternites are shiny metallic bronze, posterior sternites are shining red-brown; this colour transition beginning around the middle of S5. Smooth, stigmatic dots apparent from S2–S7. The opening of the scent gland is indicated by the rounded, sclerotised edge protruding onto S7 medially. Underside of cerci are bright orange and banded with tiny hairs ( Figure 4B, D View FIGURE 4 ). In males S9 bears paired anal styles in notches, protruding one third of their length past the posterior margin ( Figure 5C View FIGURE 5 ). The subgenital lamina of the female (S7) is large and sculptural, plateaued medially, coming to a produced point where its posterior part is modified into the bivalvular hypogynum ( Figure 4D View FIGURE 4 ) characteristic of the family ( Mackerras 1965).
The male genitalia conform to the general plan of P. limbata described by Mackerras (1965). Male genitalia are most similar to P. viridissima , but differentiated by the process of R2 (R2b) having a more strongly defined hooked apex ( Figure 5B View FIGURE 5 ).
Material Examined. *asterisk indicates where latitude and longitude (and altitude) have been calculated from coordinates on labels. Otherwise estimated according to place names on labels.
Holotype ( Figure 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ). AUSTRALIA • 1♂, (Size mm: L 23, PL 7.4 x PW 14.8 , W 18.7, HT 9.2); Tasmania, Lake Augusta : dunes, Central Plateau * 41°52'12.60"S; 146°30'45.75"E; 1164m asl; 06 Feb. 2018; Grove, S.J. leg; Photographed alive before hand-collection; DNA (table 1); https://www.flickr.com/photos/simongrovetmag/39415278624; TMAG: F57626 View Materials GoogleMaps
Photographed paratypes ( Fig 4 View FIGURE 4 . A–D). AUSTRALIA • 1♂ (Size mm:L 28.6, PL 7.8 x PW 14.7 , W 17.11, HT 10); Tasmania, Carter Lakes, Central Plateau * 41°51'41.82"S; 146°31'36.62"E; 1156m asl; 16–17 Feb. 2019; C. Spencer and K.Richards leg; lake shore mass stranding; TMAG:F13361 GoogleMaps
AUSTRALIA • 1♀, (Size mm:L 34, PL 8 x PW 15.4 , W 18.02, HT 10); Tasmania, Carter Lakes, Central Plateau * 41°51'41.82"S; 146°31'36.62"E; 1156m asl; 16–17 Feb. 2019; C. Spencer and K.Richards leg; lake shore mass stranding; TMAG:F13354 GoogleMaps
Genital dissection paratype ( Fig 5 View FIGURE 5 . A–D): AUSTRALIA • 1♂, (Size mm:L 30.3, PL 7.8 x PW 15 , W 17.2, HT 9.8); Tasmania, Lake Botsford, Central Plateau * 41°52'44.05''S; 146°30'30.33''E; 1153m asl; 30 Dec. 2016; Among low alpine herbage. Genitalia dissected. DNA (table 1); QVM GoogleMaps :2018:12:0916.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Polyzosteriinae |
Genus |