CRASSATELLIDAE, Ferussac, 1822
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00385.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/131887E2-6339-1E2B-1839-4BBFFDFCF93E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
CRASSATELLIDAE |
status |
|
( CRASSATELLIDAE View in CoL , CARDITIDAE , ASTARTIDAE )
Sperm ultrastructure has been examined in three species of Crassatellidae , one species of Carditidae and one species of Astartidae ( Healy, 1995a, b, 1996a; present study: Fig. 7). The crassatelloidean spermatozoon differs profoundly from those of Hemidonax in almost all features: (1) the acrosomal vesicle is long and attenuate and the subacrosomal material is developed as a thick axial rod ( Hemidonax : acrosomal vesicle short and squat; subacrosomal material diffuse and granular); (2) the nucleus is narrow and rod-shaped ( Hemidonax : nucleus short and wide); (3) the proximal centriole transforms into an electrondense rod connecting the distal centriole (and axoneme) to the nuclear base ( Hemidonax : proximal centriole unmodified); and (4) the midpiece consists of eight (occasionally seven or nine) wedge-shaped mitochondria, tightly packed around the centriolar complex ( Hemidonax : midpiece exhibits four round, unmodified mitochondria). The idea of a crassatelloidean affinity for Hemidonax (e.g. Hedley, 1906, 1909, 1923) or for that matter a link between the Carditidae and Hemidonax + Cardiidae (e.g. Schneider & Carter, 2001) can safely be rejected purely on spermatological grounds.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.