Notorhinus, Moritz & Parra-Gómez, 2023

Moritz, Leif & Parra-Gomez, Antonio, 2023, Notorhinus floresi sp. nov. gen. nov.: The first records of Siphonophorida in Chile and Siphonorhinidae in South America (Colobognatha), Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny 81, pp. 565-579 : 565

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.81.e100520

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D1591625-B28B-4400-BA86-CBD3C480012A

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5CF0E1D3-B711-450A-80FD-012AF96FA691

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:5CF0E1D3-B711-450A-80FD-012AF96FA691

treatment provided by

Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny by Pensoft

scientific name

Notorhinus
status

gen. nov.

3.1.2. Genus Notorhinus gen. nov.

Type species.

Notorhinus floresi sp. nov.

Diagnosis.

Pale, thin and elongated Siphonorhinidae with pyriform heads. In Notorhinus gen. nov. (Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 7 View Figure 7 ) two backwards projecting spines are situated behind the elevated ozopores (Figs 4E View Figure 4 , 8G View Figure 8 ), and the posterior margin of the metazonite (limbus) carries sculptures in shape of a fluke (tail-fin) (Figs 4D View Figure 4 , 8H View Figure 8 ). Notorhinus gen. nov. differs from all other Siphonorhinidae genera by the absence of sensilla basiconica on antennomere 5 and the arrangement of numerous sensilla basiconica on antennomere 6 in a field not sunken into a sensory pit (Figs 3E View Figure 3 , 8C View Figure 8 ). In Siphonorhinus and Kleruchus (see Attems 1930 for S. pellita ; Attems 1938 for Teratognathus (syn. of Siphonorhinus ) and Kleruchus ) numerous sensilla basiconica are located in sensory pits (Sinnesgruben sensu Attems 1930) on antennomeres 5 and 6. In Illacme few sensilla basiconica are arranged in rows along the apical margin of antennomeres 5 and 6 ( Marek et al. 2012, 2016) and in Madagascarhinus sensilla basiconica are arranged in 2 - 3 rows on antennomeres 5 and 6 ( Wesener 2023). In Nematozonium no sensory structures are evident on the antennae according to Shelley and Hoffman (2004). Notorhinus gen. nov. differs from Illacme by the fusion of the first legs’ coxae to the sternite (Fig. 3G View Figure 3 ), forming a coxosternite (see Marek et al. 2012, 2016 for Illacme ), as is the case in Siphonorhinus (see Enghoff et al. 2015). Furthermore, the specimens differ from Kleruchus by the presence of an anal scale/hypoproct (Figs 4F View Figure 4 , 8I View Figure 8 ) (Analschuppe sensu Attems 1938).

Remarks.

Several characters are shared with the genus Illacme Cook and Loomis, 1928 (see Marek et al. 2012, 2016 for detailed documentation): antennomeres 5 and 6 longer and wider; antennae elbowed between antennomeres 3 and 4 (Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ); presence of cluster of spiniform sensilla basiconica (spiniform basiconic sensilla sensu Marek et al. 2016) next to apical sensory cones (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ); labrum with incision, lined by teeths; pores of salivary glands arranged in a single circular field above the labrum (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ); gonopods with 7 podomeres (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ); posterior gonopods apical podomere with three branches: two apically laminate/flattened branches and a single posterior spine-like branch (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ). However, some of these characters are not well studied in the remaining genera of the Siphonorhinidae .

Etymology.

Noto is derived from the ancient greek νότος ( nótos) meaning south and refers to the distribution of the genus in South America and the fact that it is the most southern record of the family Siphonorhinidae . Rhinus is derived from the ancient Greek ῥῑ ́ς (rhī́s; genitive: ῥῑνός ( rhīnós)), meaning nose, and refers to the acuminate head shape. Rhinus is often part of taxonomic names in the group (e.g. Siphonorhinidae Cook, 1895, Siphonorhinus Pocock, 1894, Madagascarhinus Wese-ner, 2023).