Massalongia altaica Fedotova, 1990
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.958.54300 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1D6AF59-839A-4197-8276-6AAB6B3669D8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/15028DC7-A5D8-576C-B926-4268E5F0DAFC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Massalongia altaica Fedotova, 1990 |
status |
|
Massalongia altaica Fedotova, 1990 View in CoL
Description.
(Based on Fedotova 1991). Head. Female flagellomere XII variable in shape, rounded to oblong with apical constriction; male flagellomere XII slightly tapered distally.
Thorax. Wing length 2.7 times width.
Female abdomen. Ovipositor: cerci rounded, microtrichose, without setae.
Male abdomen. Terminalia: gonostylus with pointed denticles; cerci triangular; hypoproct bilobed, longer than cerci; aedeagus widened apically and basally, shorter than hypoproct.
Pupa. Unknown.
Larva. Unknown.
Distribution.
Kazakhstan: Central Altaï, Koksuïskiï Mountain Range, Lymin Belok Mt., 60 km NE of Leninogorsk ( Fedotova 1991).
Gall and life history.
Massalongia altaica form barely visible swellings, 5-7 mm long, on the leaves of Betula nana var. rotundifolia (Spach) Regel. ( B. rotundifolia in the original description). The mature larva leaves the gall through an opening on the lower side of the leaf and overwinters in the ground ( Fedotova 1991).
Remarks.
Massalongia altaica was described from adult specimens reared from larvae that emerged from leaf galls on B. rotundifolia , which is currently known as a variety of B. nana , the same host plant of M. bachmaieri ( The Plant List 2013). The illustration of M. altaica galls provided in its original description ( Fedotova 1991) is quite similar to the galls of M. bachmaieri (Fig. 43 View Figures 43–47 ). Morphologically, the adults of M. altaica are closest to M. bachmaieri and differ from them only in the shape of the aedeagus and male hypoproct and the relative length of cerci to male hypoproct, but these differences are based on the original description of M. altaica ( Fedotova 1991). Because the type specimens of M. altaica were not available to us, we could not verify the differences between M. altaica and M. bachmaieri . A future examination of M. altaica types and its immature stages may result in synonymizing it under M. bachmaieri .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |