Cyclorhipidion tenuigraphum (Schedl) stat. res.
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.983.52630 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7DED4CE2-934C-4539-945F-758930C927F9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/15FFF86A-A828-BAB4-B07A-6EEE28FE4D3A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cyclorhipidion tenuigraphum (Schedl) stat. res. |
status |
|
Cyclorhipidion tenuigraphum (Schedl) stat. res. Fig. 45E, F, K View Figure 45
Xyleborus tenuigraphus Schedl, 1953c: 29.
Cyclorhipidion tenuigraphus (Schedl): Beaver and Liu 2010: 24 (as a synonym of C. fukiense ).
Type material.
Lectotype Xyleborus tenuigraphus (NHMW).
New records.
China: Yunnan, Lijiang, v.1975, Zhizhong Zhang, ex Pistacia weinmannifolia (NMNH, 1). India: Assam, 4 mi N. Cherrapunji, 1378 m, 3.x.1961, E.S. Rose, D.Q. Cavagnaro (CASC, 1). Vietnam: Cao Bang, 22°34.118'N, 105°52.537'E, 1048 m, 12-17.iv.2014, VN9, Cognato, Smith, Pham, ex FIT (MSUC, 1).
Diagnosis.
2.7-3.0 mm long (mean = 2.84 mm; n = 4); 2.5-3.0 × as long as wide. This species is distinguished by the short, steep declivity that is approximately 25% of total elytral length, armed with large tubercles on interstriae 1 and 3, interstriae 2 granulate on apical 1/3; posterolateral margins rounded; and declivital interstriae 1 and 2 setae in two confused rows (Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Similar species.
This species is a part of a challenging species group consisting of C. bodoanum , C. distinguendum , C. inarmatum , C. pelliculosum , and C. xeniolum (Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Distribution.
China (Fujian, Yunnan*), India* (Assam), Vietnam*.
Host plants.
This species has only been recorded from Pistacia ( Anacardiaceae ).
Remarks.
In his description Schedl lists the species as 2.3 mm long. The lectotype is 2.7 mm long. Xyleborus tenuigraphum was previously considered a synonym of X. fukiense by Beaver and Liu (2010) based on comparison between the lectotype, a specimen of C. fukiense compared to the holotype by Schedl, and an additional specimen with the same locality data as the homotype but identified by Schedl as X. tenuigraphum . Schedl clearly erred in his identification of his homotype specimen as the two species are distinguished by the characters listed above in the diagnosis and Table 1 View Table 1 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |