Aedes (Phagomyia) gubernatoris (Giles)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5303.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DE9C1F18-5CEE-4968-9991-075B977966FE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8064168 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/161B87CD-BA1E-0A7A-FF54-FEC1FA9659D2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aedes (Phagomyia) gubernatoris (Giles) |
status |
|
Aedes (Phagomyia) gubernatoris (Giles) View in CoL
subspecies gubernatoris ( Giles, 1901a) View in CoL —original combination: Culex gubernatoris View in CoL . Distribution: Bangladesh, India, Nepal, People’s Republic of China, Sri Lanka ( Wilkerson et al. 2021, incorrectly listed from Thailand).
subspecies kotiensis Barraud, 1934 —original combination: Aedes (Finlaya) gubernatoris var. kotiensis View in CoL (subspecific status by Harbach & Howard 2007). Distribution: India (Western Himalayas) ( Barraud 1934).
Barraud (1934) described and named kotiensis as a variety of gubernatoris based on larvae that differ in having shorter antennae and lateral palatal brush filaments with “comparatively very large teeth”; however, “adults resulting from these larvae appear to be indistinguishable from the type-form.” Information provided by Barraud indicates that the two forms may be allopatric. In the absence of features that distinguish the adults, the perceived larval distinctions may be associated with conditions that influence growth and development in the tree-hole habitats utilized by the larvae. Based on these observations, we believe that subspecies kotiensis is a morphological variant of Aedes gubernatoris , which we therefore formally recognize as a synonym: kotiensis Barraud, 1934, junior subjective synonym of Aedes (Phagomyia) gubernatoris ( Giles, 1901a) . This agrees with the Encyclopedia of Life, which does not list kotiensis as a species.
In addition to kotiensis, Ae. gubernatoris has another synonym, Lepidotomyia magna Theobald, 1905a , first recognized by Barraud (1934), which we retain. All three nominal forms have type localities in India.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.