Notiobia nitidipennis (LeConte)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X(2001)055[0113:TTSONC]2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/186887E4-057D-FFED-892A-F8B5FD57FAE1 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Notiobia nitidipennis (LeConte) |
status |
|
Notiobia nitidipennis (LeConte) View in CoL
Eurytrichus nitidipennis LeConte, 1848: 388 . Type material: Holotype male, labelled: orange disc, without lettering, ‘‘504’’, ‘‘TYPE 5963’’, ‘‘ E. nitidipennis LeC.’’ (MCZ). Type area : Georgia, as originally cited.
Anisotarsus delicatus Casey, 1914: 214 View in CoL . Type locality: Asheville, North Carolina. Type not studied.
Harpalus conspectus Casey, 1924: 104 View in CoL . Type locality: Mt. Royal , Quebec, Canada, as originally cited. Type not studied.
Harpalus agitabilis Casey, 1924: 104 View in CoL . Type locality: District of Columbia, as originally cited. Type not studied.
Notes About Type Material. The holotype of Eurytrichus nitidipennis LeConte View in CoL was studied to confirm its identity. The other types were not studied, as they are from areas other than Florida, and I accept their nomenclatural status as junior synonyms, as recorded by Noonan (1973:305) .
Comparison. Specimens of this species are separated from those of N. cephalus by a combination of three character states (supported by ratios) and locality: head narrower (Hw/Pw = 0.662 –0.710; Hw/SBL = 0.236 –0.252); gena narrower (Gw/Sw = 0.545 –0.818); pronotum narrower (Pl/Pw = 0.676 – 0.719) and from a locality other than Florida. Additionally, males have only 1 pair of setae on sternum VII.
See Table 1 for data about variation in selected values of body proportions for this species (nonFloridian sample). All mensural values for the holotype of N. nitidipennis fall within the ranges expressed in Table 1 for the series of N. nitidipennis from Pennsylvania. Also, N. nitidipennis did not show any clinal variation from north to south.
Geographical Distribution. This species ranges from southern Ontario and Quebec in Canada through the eastern third of United States, and west to Arkansas and Texas , but has not been recorded from Florida.
Material Examined. A total of 46 specimens, including the types noted above, was examined. Non type material was seen from the following localities: U.S.A. Georgia. Clarke Co. Male, Athens, 8.IV.1977, C.W. Fisher ( TAMU) . New York. Tompkins Co. Male, Ithaca , 3.VI.1940, P.P. Babiy ( UASM) . McLean Res. : male, 1.VI.1952 ( UASM) ; male, Mud Pond , 28.V.1952 ( UASM) . North Carolina. Haywood Co. Male , Mt. Sterling, V VI.1938, W.B. Jones ( CUIC) . Pennsylvania. Allegheny Co. Female ( CUIC) ; E.A. Klages : female, 29.V.1887 ( CUIC) ; female, 30.V.1887 ( CUIC) ; male, male, 16.VI.1894 ( CUIC) ; 4.VII.1895 ( CUIC) ; male 8.VII.1893 ( CUIC) ; male, IX.1895 ( CUIC) . Dauphin Co. Rockville: male, 4 females ( CUIC) ; 3 males, female, 1.V ( CUIC) ; male, 2 females, 1.VI.1910 ( CUIC) . Westmoreland Co. Powdermill Nature Reserve , Rte. 381, 5 km s Rector, pitfalls, E. Censky: 2 females, 26.IV2.V.1982 ( CMNH) ; male, female, 16–20.V.1982 ( CMNH) ; female, 30.V9.VI.1982 ( CMNH) ; 8 males, 5 females, 22–29.VI.1982 ( CMNH) ; male, female, 29.VI9.VII.1982 ( CMNH) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Notiobia nitidipennis (LeConte)
Shpeley, Danny 2001 |
Harpalus conspectus
Casey 1924: 104 |
Harpalus agitabilis
Casey 1924: 104 |
Anisotarsus delicatus
Casey 1914: 214 |
Eurytrichus nitidipennis
LeConte 1848 |