Cephennium (Geodytes) gladiator Jałoszyński & Struyve, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4189.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4EAADC4A-C8F5-4A5A-A1D5-CE62F503097B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087507 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1900334D-9A66-BF30-EDF1-F8CFFB5311FA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cephennium (Geodytes) gladiator Jałoszyński & Struyve |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cephennium (Geodytes) gladiator Jałoszyński & Struyve sp. n.
( Figs 1–22 View FIGURES 1 – 2 View FIGURES 3 – 7 View FIGURES 8 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 21 View FIGURE 22 )
Type material. Holotype: SPAIN (Galicia) : ♂, two labels: " SPAIN Galicia / Áspera , N42.554° W7.937° / 17.03.2015 / leg. Tim Struyve " [white, printed], " CEPHENNIUM / ( GEODYTES ) / gladiator / Jałoszyński & Struyve / HOLOTYPUS " [red, printed] ( MNHW) GoogleMaps . Paratypes (32 exs.): 1 ♀, same data as for holotype; 1 Ƌ, Spain, Galicia, Trabada , N43.439° W7.171°, 13.04.2013 GoogleMaps ; 4 ƋƋ, 1 ♀, Covelo , N42.267° W8.328°, 19.03.2015 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, Espiño , N41.874° W7.556°, 17.04.2015 GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, Boborás , N42.416° W8.143°, 20.05.2013 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, San Sadurniño , N43.494° W8.047°, 25.04.2013 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, Lamas de Moreira , N43.056° W7.075°, 27.03.2013 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, Moscoso , N42.328° W8.489°, 19.05.2013 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, Sueiro , N43.519° W6.877°, 13.04.2014 GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀, Cepeda , N42.250° W8.589°, 19.05.2013 GoogleMaps ; 8 ƋƋ, 1 ♀, Portomouro , N42.967° W8.628°, 22.05.2013 GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, 1 ♀, Torre , N43.403° W8.041°, 14.04.2013 GoogleMaps ; 2 ƋƋ, 2 ♀♀, Vila da Igrexa , N43.618° W8.014°, 15.04.2013 (cPJ, MNHW, TSCB). Each paratype with yellow printed label " CEPHENNIUM ( GEODYTES ) / gladiator / Jałoszyński & Struyve / PARATYPUS ". GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Metatrochanters in males strongly modified, each with blade-like projection reaching 3/4 length of metafemur; metaventrite in males barely discernibly impressed posteriorly; both sexes with eyes composed of single ommatidium; endophallus slightly elongate, bell-shaped, distinctly divided into lateral halves, in erected state with a pair of subtriangular, pointed distal projections.
Description. BL 0.88–0.90 mm; body of male ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) strongly elongate and weakly convex, light brown, setae yellowish.
Head broadest at eyes, HL 0.11 mm, HW 0.15–0.16 mm; vertex and frons confluent, covered with fine and inconspicuous punctures and short, sparse and suberect setae; antennal tubercles weakly raised but distinct; eyes composed of single ommatidium ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ; om), pigmented as lightly as surrounding cuticle, strongly projecting laterally. Antennae ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) long and slender, with indistinctly delimited club composed of antennomeres IX–XI, AnL 0.34–0.35 mm, antennomeres I–II strongly elongate, III–IV about as long as broad, V indistinctly longer than broad, VI–X transverse, XI about as long as IX–X combined, about 1.8 × as long as broad.
Pronotum in dorsal view ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) approximately semioval, broadest slightly in front of middle, PL 0.28 mm, PW 0.30 mm; anterior margin and sides in anterior half rounded; lateral margins distinctly convergent posteriorly and weakly rounded in posterior half; hind pronotal corners obtuse and blunt; posterior margin indistinctly bisinuate laterally and nearly straight at middle. Sides of pronotum with distinct lateral carinae ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) broadest at base and narrowing anteriorly. Punctures on pronotal disc ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) very fine, shallow and sparse; setae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) short, sparse and suberect.
Elytra ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) oval and evenly but weakly convex, broadest distinctly in front of middle; EL 0.50–0.53 mm, EW 0.35 mm, EI 1.43–1.50; humeral denticles ( Figs 3, 6 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ; hd) small and rounded; basal elytral fovea ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ; bef) on each elytron large and located closer to lateral margin of mesoscutellum than to humeral denticle; apical margin of each elytron ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) nearly transverse in relation to the long axis of body. Punctures on elytra ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) similar to those on pronotum; setae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) similarly sparse but slightly longer than those on pronotum.
Metaventrite ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) with indistinct, very shallow posterior median impression not demarcated from surrounding areas; metaventral intercoxal process ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ; mtvp) with its lateral corners projecting posteriorly and forming long and pointed spines.
Legs ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 , 5–7 View FIGURES 3 – 7 , 20–21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) moderately long and slender, protibiae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ) lacking subapical notches; metatrochanters ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 , 7 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ) strongly modified, each with long blade-like projection on posteroventral margin, projection reaches 3/4 of metafemur.
Aedeagus ( Figs 8–19 View FIGURES 8 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) elongate, AeL 0.28 mm in repose and 0.30 mm in erected state; median lobe in ventral view oval with truncated apex, endophallus located in subapical region, bell-shaped, elongate and with paired lateral components; parameres slender, each bearing single apical seta. In erected state ( Figs 16–19 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) endophallus completely extruded, subtrapezoidal, with a pair of apical subtriangular projections, each projection with serrate external margin ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ).
Female. Differs from male in unmodified metatrochanters; BL 0.88 mm; HL 0.10 mm, HW 0.16 mm, AnL 0.34 mm; PL 0.28 mm, PW 0.30 mm, EL 0.50 mm, EW 0.33 mm, EI 1.54.
Variability. The studied males (26 specimens) show variability in the metatrochanteral projection, which is nearly parallel-sided ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) to distinctly broadened distally ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ), with gradual transition between these extreme forms. Differences seen in the shape of endophallus ( Figs 8–15 View FIGURES 8 – 15 ) are results of movable apical components being partly displaced in some specimens, and the entire endophallus being slightly tilted dorsally or ventrally. Examination of aedeagi of all available males demonstrated that lateroapical subtriangular components in erected state rotate in such a way that they adopt apical orientation with pointed tips directed laterally ( Figs 16, 18 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ) or, in some cases, nearly dorsally. These components can be seen 'folded' inside apical portion of endophallus in repose, with their pointed tips directed toward base of aedeagus, but in most cases these structures are obscured by other endophallic components and are not distinguishable from surrounding sclerites. Differences in the shape of apical margin of aedeagus ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 15 vs. 14) and the shape of endophallus do not correlate with the shape of metatrochanteral projections.
Distribution. North-western Spain ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 ).
Etymology. Gladiator , Latin 'swordsman', derived from gladius, a sword; used here in its original meaning of a sword-bearer; refers to the sword-like projections of metatrochanters.
Additional collecting data. All specimens were collected from the soil under leaf litter (up to 40 cm deep) in natural acidophilous oak-dominated forests or remains of those within eucalypt plantations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |