SEBECOSUCHIA
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3382461 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4710442 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1A7187CF-FFC8-177F-FEE8-FCF5E3215352 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
SEBECOSUCHIA |
status |
|
SUBORDER? SEBECOSUCHIA
Figure 8Y, Z View FIG
AMNH 8549 represents another rare group which is tentatively assigned to the Sebecosuchia (fig. 8Y, Z). Sebecosuchian teeth resemble theropod teeth as pointed out by Simpson (1937a, 1937b) and Colbert (1946), and were consistently confused as such by earlier workers. Such teeth differ from contemporary theropod teeth in that the blade is usually straighter, the serrations on the anterior and the posterior sides are finer, and a more prominent groove is present along the midline of the tooth on the lingual and labial side.
Similar teeth have been reported from the Milk River Formation of Alberta ( Russell, 1935, p. 123, fig. 9) and from the Lance Formation of Wyoming ( Estes, 1964, p. 143). They have yet to be reported, however, from the Judith River Formation or from its equivalent formation in Alberta.
Russell (1935) suggested that the teeth may have come from the premaxilla of a deinodont. Considering the known skulls of these large carnivores, this seems unlikely. Estes (1964, p. 143), on the other hand, believed it probable that the teeth represent a juvenile theropod. At present, there is no conclusive evidence that the teeth belong to the theropods, or, for that matter, to the Saurischia .
Langston (1956) reviewed criteria useful in distinguishing between sebecid teeth and carnosaur teeth.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.