Hydrometra ruschii Cordeiro, Rodrigues & Moreira, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5393.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1BA2FC4-6946-4A3F-9A22-7234F67C0670 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10437970 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B07250A-6D1B-FFA8-FF5A-FAD69C50FA79 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hydrometra ruschii Cordeiro, Rodrigues & Moreira |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hydrometra ruschii Cordeiro, Rodrigues & Moreira , sp. nov.
Figs. 5C, E View FIGURE 5 , 26–29 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29
Material examined. Holotype. BRAZIL — Espírito Santo • Santa Teresa, Reserva Biológica Augusto Ruschi , stream; alt. 834 m; −19.8967, −40.5236; 22.VI.2022; JC Santos, JMS Rodrigues, NO Paiva, N Nery, CL Rodrigues leg.; 1 male, CEIOC 82254 GoogleMaps . Paratypes. BRAZIL — Espírito Santo • Santa Teresa, Reserva Biológica Augusto Ruschi , stream; alt. 834 m; −19.8967, −40.5236; 22. VI.2022; JC Santos, JMS Rodrigues, NO Paiva, N Nery, CL Rodrigues leg.; 1 female, CEIOC 82255 GoogleMaps • Santa Teresa, Reserva Biológica Augusto Ruschi, stream near the headquarter; alt. 838 m; −19.9111, −40.5544; 22. VI.2022; JC Santos, JMS Rodrigues, NO Paiva, L Nery, CL Rodrigues leg.; 2 males, CEIOC 82256 GoogleMaps .
Description. Micropterous male. Holotype (Paratypes). BL 11.70 [without segment VIII] (11.80–11.95); HL 3.80 (3.80–3.95); ANTL 2.50 (2.50–2.60); POSTL 1.10 (1.05–1.10); ANTWmax 0.40 (0.40–0.44); ANTWmin 0.20 (0.20); POSTWmax 0.40 (0.35–0.38); POSTWmin 0.25 (0.25–0.28); CLL 0.16 (0.14); CLWmax 0.14 (0.14), MPL 0.18 (0.20–0.22); HW 0.50 (0.48–0.50); IOW 0.12 (0.10–0.12); OL 0.28 (0.28–0.30); EYE 0.20 (0.18–0.20); ANT: I 0.65 (0.64–0.70), II 1.30 (1.25–1.26), III 2.10 (4.10–4.20), IV missing (2.20–2.30); LBL: I–II covered, III 2.00 (2.00), IV 0.30 (0.30); PL 1.70 (1.70); PW 0.60 (0.60); WiL 0.70 (0.60); WiW 0.08 (0.06–0.10); DIST1 1.10 (1.10–1.20); DIST2 1.75 (1.70–1.80); FORELEG, FEM 4.00 (4.00–4.20); TIB 4.70 (4.60–4.70); TAR: I 0.06 (0.06– 0.08), TAR II 0.30 (0.28–0.30), TAR III 0.24 (0.22–0.24); MIDLEG, FEM 4.50 (4.40–4.80); TIB 4.90 (4.90–5.60); TAR: I 0.06 (0.08), II 0.34 (0.32–0.34), III 0.24 (0.22–0.24); HINDLEG, FEM 5.20 (5.20–5.60); TIB 6.80 (6.40); TAR: I 0.06 (0.07–0.10), II 0.34 (0.28), III 0.26 (0.24–0.26); ABL 4.20 [without segment VIII] (4.90); ABWmax 0.50 (0.50); ABWmin 0.40 (0.40); TERL: I covered, II 0.80 (0.70–0.80), III 0.80 (0.85–0.90), IV 0.80 (0.80–0.85), V 0.80 (0.80), VI 0.70 (0.70), VII 0.60 (0.60); TERW: I covered, II 0.20 (0.20), III 0.22 (0.20–0.22), IV 0.22 (0.22– 0.25), V 0.22 (0.22–0.25), VI 0.22 (0.20–0.22), VII 0.30 (0.25–0.27); SVIII 0.56 (0.50–0.52); PP 0.04 (0.04–0.06).
Body brown to dark-brown; whitish longitudinal stripe laterally on thorax and abdomen ( Fig. 26A–C View FIGURE 26 ). Clypeus, antennal tubercles antennomeres I and II, bucculae and maxillary plate dark-brown. Antennomeres III and IV, and labium brown. Eye dark-brown. Legs brown; coxae and venter of trochanters yellow. Venter of head, thorax and abdomen reddish-brown.
Head elongated; apex of anteocular region swollen; anteocular region 2.3 times longer than postocular region; region around eyes slightly swollen, giving impression of a small groove on interocular space; posterior pair of trichobothria reaching anterior margin of pronotum. Clypeus broad; lateral margins constricted basally; anterior margin rounded ( Fig. 26D View FIGURE 26 ). Anterior margin of maxillary plate truncated. Buccula rounded, covering base of labium. Eye well-developed, set on posterior 1/3 of head ( Fig. 26A, B, E View FIGURE 26 ). Antenniferous tubercle with a small V-shaped emargination on anterior margin.Antennomere I shortest, densely covered by short setae; III longest. Labium reaching postocular region of head. Venter of head swollen around eyes, with few setae.
Dorsum of thorax almost completely devoid of punctations, with only a very weak row on pronotal collar (only visible in lateral view in wet specimen); pro- and mesoacetabula each with one large pit anteriorly and another one posteriorly, without smaller circular punctations; metacetabula without large pits or smaller punctations ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ). Forewing reduced, reaching half of metathorax. Mesoacetabulum set closer to fore- than to metacetabulum. Legs long, slender. Venter of thorax without carinae, tubercles or grooves.
Abdomen obliquely oriented dorsally on segments III–VII, becoming parallel to body on segment VIII. Abdominal mediotergites II–VI longer than broad, with glabrous shiny aspect and striated median portion; mediotergite VII trapezoidal, opaque, with setae, except for glabrous shiny circular area anteriorly. Abdominal laterotergites slightly elevated. Abdominal sternum VI slightly grooved centrally; posteriorly with a pair of tufts of mesally directed setae; abdominal sternum VII constricted ventrolaterally, joined mesally by a wide transverse ridge without projections ( Fig. 26F–H View FIGURE 26 ). Abdominal segment VIII cylindrical, slightly constricted ventrolaterally; posterodorsal margin slightly expanded laterally; posterodorsal process short, straight, with approximately 5% of total length of segment ( Figs. 26F–H View FIGURE 26 , 27A–C View FIGURE 27 ). Pygophore with rounded apex; V-shaped emargination on lateral margin with a few dark setae ( Fig. 27D, E View FIGURE 27 ). Proctiger with rounded apex, without lateral projections ( Fig. 27F View FIGURE 27 ).
Micropterous female. Paratype. BL 12.30; HL 3.85; ANTL 2.45 ; POSTL 1.10 ; ANTWmax 0.50; ANTWmin 0.20; POSTWmax 0.45; POSTWmin 0.30; CCL 0.18; CLWmax 0.16; MPL 0.14; HW 0.52; IOW 0.12; OL 0.30; EYE 0.20; ANT: I 0.70, II 1.25 , III 3.90 , IV 2.20 ; LBL: I– II covered, III 2.50 , IV 0.30; PL 1.75 ; PW 0.60; WiL 0.80; WiW 0.10; DIST1 1.20; DIST2 1.75; FORELEG, FEM 4.20; TIB 4.60; TAR: I 0.08, II 0.34, III 0.22; MIDLEG, FEM 4.50; TIB 4.90; TAR: I 0.08, II 0.38, III 0.24; HINDLEG, FEM 5.60; TIB 6.80; TAR: I 0.08, II 0.34, III 0.24; ABL 5.40; ABWmax 0.90; ABWmin 0.50; TERL: I covered, II 0.90, III 0.90, IV 0.90, V 0.90, VI 0.80, VII 0.60; TERW: I covered, II 0.20, III 0.22, IV 0.25, V 0.22, VI 0.22, VII 0.30; SVIII 0.44; PP 0.14.
General color brown; head with dark-brown portion on anteocular region. Maxillary plate and article III of labium light-brown. Coxae and trochanters whitish yellow ventrally. Abdominal laterotergites II–VII with longitudinal yellow stripe. Abdominal sterna II–VI with dark-brown median stripe; sternum VII anteriorly with submedian pair of circular yellow spots ( Fig. 28C View FIGURE 28 ).
Similar to male in structure, except for the following: pronotum with very weak sparse punctations on collar and posterior lobe (only visible in wet specimen); abdomen less strongly oriented dorsally from segment IV to VII ( Fig. 28B View FIGURE 28 ); abdominal segment VIII triangular, with posterior portion (including posterior process) shiny; posterior process with approximately 30% of total length of segment ( Fig. 28A–C View FIGURE 28 ).
Etymology. This new species is named in honor of Augusto Ruschi (1915–1986), a naturalist who has been essential for the creation of the biological reserve (also named in his honor) where it was collected.
Comments. Hydrometra ruschii Cordeiro, Rodrigues & Moreira , sp. nov. can be distinguished from its South American congeners by the following combination of characteristics: clypeus broad, with lateral margins constricted basally and anterior margin rounded ( Fig. 26D View FIGURE 26 ); dorsum of thorax almost completely devoid of punctations; pro- and mesoacetabula each with one large pit anteriorly and another one posteriorly, without smaller circular punctations ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ); metacetabula without large pits or smaller punctations ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ); male abdominal sternum VI slightly grooved centrally, posteriorly with a pair of tufts of mesally directed setae ( Fig. 26F–H View FIGURE 26 ); male abdominal sternum VII constricted ventrolaterally, joined mesally by a wide transverse ridge without projections ( Fig. 26F–H View FIGURE 26 ); male abdominal segment VIII cylindrical, slightly constricted ventrolaterally, with the posterior margin slightly expanded laterally and the posterior process short, straight, with approximately 5% of the total length of the segment ( Figs. 26F–H View FIGURE 26 , 27A–C View FIGURE 27 ); and male pygophore with rounded apex and a lateral V-shaped emargination bearing a few dark setae ( Fig. 27D, E View FIGURE 27 ).
This new species is similar in general aspect to H. guianana Hungerford & Evans, 1934 . They share the dark body with a whitish longitudinal stripe along the sides of the thorax and abdomen, and the male abdominal mediotergite VII with a glabrous, shiny, circular area anteriorly. Differently from the new species, however, H. guianana has the clypeus curved upwards near the apex and with an angulose median projection at the anterior margin ( Nieser 1970: fig 187), bears punctations on the dorsum of the thorax and on all acetabula ( Nieser 1970: fig. 188), and displays completely different modifications of the male abdomen (compare Fig. 26F– H View FIGURE 26 and Hungerford & Evans 1934: plate X). The same aspects shared between the new species and H. guianana are also present in H. fruhstorferi , except for the glabrous, shiny area on male abdominal mediotergite VII. Unlike the new species, however, H. fruhstorferi has the anterior margin of the clypeus obtusely pointed, bears numerous punctations on the dorsum of the thorax and on all acetabula, and has different modifications of the male abdomen (compare Fig. 26F– H View FIGURE 26 and Hungerford & Evans 1934: plate X).
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
MPL |
Musee de Port Louis |
PW |
Paleontological Collections |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |