Campylaspis mioarae, Petrescu, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.70.2018.1645 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:82A58B37-13FE-4EA8-AFF2-E954CDBEFD69 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5237035 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1D178785-FF83-FFAF-537E-01C2FC0BB743 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Campylaspis mioarae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Campylaspis mioarae View in CoL sp. nov.
Fig. 23 View Figure 23
Holotype subadult ♀, 7.5 mm, P.88255, Australia, NSW, east of Long Reef , -33.72° 151.77°, 174 m, epibenthic sled, 20 Dec 1985, J.K. Lowry, R. T. Springthorpe, FRV Kapala , K85-21-08, in AM.
Etymology. The species is dedicated to the memory of my beloved aunt, Mioara Făgărăşanu (1930–2001), as a sign of eternal love and gratitude for all the help and care she offered to me in her life.
Diagnosis. Carapace 0.44 body length, with small acute tubercles interspersed with pits, 1 larger pair of tubercles on basis frontal lobe; pereon and pleon with dorsal and lateral small teeth; maxilliped 2 propodus with 1 medial tooth; pereopod 2 dactylus 3.3 propodus length, with pedunculate tip; uropodal peduncle 2 pleonite 6 length, 2.75 endopod length; endopod with 6 simple setae medially.
Description. Carapace 0.44 body length, 1.5 longer than high; with small acute tubercles and pits, 1 pair of larger tubercles on basis of frontal lobe; pseudorostrum 0.3 carapace length, meeting in front of ocular lobe; ocular lobe without lenses; antennal notch present; anterolateral margin serrated ( Fig. 23 A, B View Figure 23 ). — Pereon and pleon with dorsal and lateral denticles. — Maxilliped 2 basis fused with ischium, 1 plumose seta medially; merus with 1 plumose seta; carpus 1.5 merus length, with 1 tooth and 2 simple setae medially; propodus with 1 medial tooth and 1 robust seta, as long as 3 denticles of dactylus ( Fig. 23 C View Figure 23 ). — Maxilliped 3 basis 1.3 rest of article’s length, with 3 simple and 7 plumose setae; large merus, 4.6 ischium length, with strong serrated margins, 3 simple and 2 plumose setae; carpus 0.7 merus length, with serrated margins, 1 plumose and 6 simple setae; propodus 0.5 carpus length, with 1 plumose and 2 pappose setae; dactylus 0.6 propodus length, with 3 simple setae; with exopod ( Fig. 23 D View Figure 23 ). — Pereopod 1 robust basis 0.8 rest of article’s length, serrated medially with 5 plumose setae; merus 4.3 ischium length, with strong teeth, with 10 plumose setae; carpus 1.6 propodus length, serrated margins with 1 pappose and 4 simple setae; propodus 2 dactylus length, with 3 simple and 3 pappose setae; dactylus 0.5 propodus length, with 2 simple and 3 pappose setae; with exopod ( Fig. 23 E View Figure 23 ). — Pereopod 2 basis 0.3 pereopod length; merus 6 ischium length, with 1 long simple seta; carpus 2.75 propodus length, with 2 simple setae; dactylus 3.3 propodus length, with digitiform tip; with exopod ( Fig. 23 F View Figure 23 ). — Pereopods 3–5 with decreasing basis and increasing carpus length; ischium and merus with 1 simple seta; carpus and propodus with 1 annulate seta; dactylus with terminal simple seta ( Fig. 23 View Figure 23 G-I). — Uropod peduncle 2 pleonite 6 length, 2.75 endopod length, serrate margins; exopod 0.85 endopod length, with 2 simple setae; endopod with 6 simple setae medially and 1 terminal simple seta ( Fig. 23 J View Figure 23 )
Remarks. Campylaspis mioarae sp. nov. is closely related to C. marinescui sp. nov. by the carapace having tubercles; maxilliped 2 with one tooth on the propodus, as long as the dactylar teeth. Campylaspis mioarae sp. nov. differs with: carapace with acute tubercles with pit; maxilliped 3 with larger articles, without excavation on inner margin of merus, dactylus of pereopod 2 with a digitiform tip, uropod with 6 versus 4 setae on endopod.
Distribution. Australia: NSW—east of Long Reef, at 174 m depth.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
AM |
Australian Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.