Dineura parcivalvis (Konow, 1901)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4612.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E7892A3-D8AF-41C2-A1B8-F9D243474D73 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E29044C-FFCF-726A-FF10-42B3FC0F8CCC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dineura parcivalvis (Konow, 1901) |
status |
|
Dineura parcivalvis (Konow, 1901)
Pontania parcivalvis Konow, 1901a: 83 [key], subsequent description Konow 1901b: 128. Syntypes ♀, lectotype ♀ (DEI- GISHym31791, images: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7851215), designated by Lindqvist (1955) by inference of “ holotype ”, examined, in SDEI. Type locality: Livonia, Dorpat [= Estonia, Tartu].
Dineura parcivalvis: Conde (1938) ; new combination, treated as synonym of Dineura stilata var. testaceipes .
Taxonomy. Treated here as separate from testaceipes because of its different genetics ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), larval host, and penis valve morphology.
Additional description. Body length: ♀ 4.5–6.0mm, ♂ 4.5–5.0mm. Female (Fig. 17): Head black, except for brown labrum, and sometimes anterior of clypeus and underside of antennal flagellum. Thorax black, except for pale tegula, more or less pronotum, and legs. Sterna of abdomen and downturned lateral parts of terga from largely pale to nearly completely black; dorsum of abdomen black. Pterostigma uniformly brown. The five examined European female parcivalvis are very similar in colour at least to two specimens examined from Primorsky Krai, with the pronotum and venter of the abdomen extensively pale. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that there are darker specimens with darker venter and pronotum, which could be confused with possible additional species in East Palaearctic ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Lancet: Fig. 27. Male (Fig. 18): Coloration and variability similar to female: the single examined European male very pale. Penis valve: ventral spine about as long as dorsal one; ventral spine rather abruptly tapering after medial constriction, and distal portion about as long as basal portion ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 28–35 ).
Total number of specimens examined: 1♂, 7♀.
Similar species. Morphology and coloration very similar to Dineura testaceipes . Liston (2015) presented some characters, several of which had already been proposed by Lindqvist (1955), that were thought to be suitable for separating the females of parcivalvis and testaceipes . After checking a larger number of specimens of both species (identified primarily by barcoding, or because they were reared from Sorbus ), all these characters were found to be so variable in both species, except apparently for the proportions of the distal antennomeres, that they can no longer be recommended for determination. The males are distinguishable by differences in their penis valves (see key), but the female lancets are very similar, particularly the lamnium. Perhaps the shape of the tangium may be diagnostic, but this needs to be checked for a larger number of specimens: in parcivalvis tangium roughly triangular and higher in proportion to length (Fig. 27) than the proportionately lower and more rhomboid tangium of testaceipes (Fig. 26).
Life history. Host plant: Prunus padus ( Kontuniemi 1960) .
Distribution. Estonia ( Taeger et al. 2006; the record from Latvia is probably in error for Estonia, according to Viitasaari et al. 1998), Finland, Belarus ( Pankevich 1973),? Czech Republic ( Lindqvist 1955), Germany, and Russian Far East ( Liston 2015). Occurrence in Sweden: published records: none. Material examined: none.
Specimens examined. Finland: 1♂, Helsinki, leg. O. Winter (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.2412) ( FMNH) . Germany: 2♀, Brandenburg, Waldsieversdorf, 19.05.2006 (DEI-GISHym11575), 25.05.2006 (DEI-GISHym11574), leg. Lis- ton ( SDEI). Russian Far East : 2♀ (including DEI-GISHym88715).
FMNH |
Field Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dineura parcivalvis (Konow, 1901)
Liston, Andrew, Prous, Marko & Vårdal, Hege 2019 |
Pontania parcivalvis
Konow, F. W. 1901: 83 |
Konow, F. W. 1901: 128 |