Dacimita David & Hancock, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.6.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:57133287-C721-4520-8269-CD59B7EC7D9E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7224054 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E69F302-FF84-0643-E6A6-29F29604FF0F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dacimita David & Hancock |
status |
gen. nov. |
Dacimita David & Hancock View in CoL , gen. n.
Type species Dacimita curvifasciatus David & Hancock , sp. n.
Diagnosis: Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2−7 ) higher than long with single pair of weak frontal setae; ocellar and orbital setae vestigial/ absent. Face concave, fulvous with elongate, black markings; first flagellomere shorter than face, arista shortplumose; postocciput and vertex swollen. Scutum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2−7 ) elongate, black, microtrichose, with yellow lateral presutural and sublateral postsutural vittae; anepisternal stripe ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2−7 ) broad, reaching postpronotal lobe; chaetotaxy reduced. Wing ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 2−7 ) elongate, predominantly hyaline with two transverse bands, cell bm as broad as cell cua, extension of cell cua shorter than main part of cell cua; crossvein r-m placed near midlength of cell dm. Abdomen ( Figs. 5, 6 View FIGURES 2−7 ) elongate, slightly petiolate, with black transverse bands on tergites 2−5. Epandrium ( Figs. 8, 9 View FIGURES 8−14 ) sclerotised, with well developed setae, proctiger larger than epandrium; epandrium and surstylus not demarcated; phallus with well developed acrophallus, subapical lobe and preglans lobe present. Oviscape ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8−14 ) broad, setose; eversible membrane broad with semicircular spicules ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8−14 ), taeniae not prominent; aculeus ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 8−14 ) as broad as eversible membrane with conical apex and preapical constriction, sternite 8 with prominent lobes. Two spermathecae, convoluted in appearance with bulbous apex.
Etymology: Dacimita is derived from a combination of “ Dacini ” (root word- Dacus ) and “imito”, meaning resembling dacines. The genus is considered masculine
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.