Euproctinus Leng and Mutchler, 1927
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/20C9416D-D8B2-BE1C-1A24-27C2165BF32B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Euproctinus Leng and Mutchler, 1927 |
status |
|
Genus Euproctinus Leng and Mutchler, 1927
Euproctus Solier, 1849: 131 [junior homonym of Euproctus Gené, 1839]. Type species: Euproctus fasciatus Solier, 1849 by monotypy. Etymology. Uncertain, possibly from the Greek eu (well, by extension large) and proctos (anus, tail) [masculine].
Euproctinus Leng and Mutchler, 1927: 14. Replacement name for Euproctus Solier, 1849. Etymology. From the generic name Euproctus [q.v.] and the Latin suffix - inus (pertaining to) [masculine].
Andrewesella Csiki, 1932b: 1456. Replacement name for Euproctus Solier, 1849. Etymology. Although not specified, this name probably originates from the surname of Herbert Edward Andrewes [1863-1950] who devoted a large part of his life to the study of Carabidae of the Oriental Region.
Diversity.
Sixteen species restricted to the Western Hemisphere, currently arrayed in two subgenera: Euproctinus s.str. (one species, Euproctinus fasciatus Solier from Chile and Argentina) and Neoeuproctus (15 species).
Identification.
Shpeley (1986) revised the species and provided a key for their identification.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Euproctinus Leng and Mutchler, 1927
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Andrewesella
Csiki 1932 |
Euproctinus
Leng and Mutchler 1927 |
Euproctus fasciatus
Solier 1849 |
Carabidae
Latreille 1802 |