Phaeotubakia Ning Jiang, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.95.98384 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/24795432-F4C2-5879-85F3-C7B99BE789D1 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phaeotubakia Ning Jiang |
status |
gen. nov. |
Phaeotubakia Ning Jiang View in CoL View at ENA gen. nov.
Etymology.
Named derived from phaeo (= pigmented) and its morphological similarity to Tubakia .
Type species.
Phaeotubakia lithocarpicola Y.Q. Zhu & Ning Jiang.
Description.
Sexual morph: Unknown. Asexual morph in vitro: Conidiomata sporodochial, slimy, black, semi-submerged. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells brown, smooth, guttulate, cylindrical to ampulliform, attenuate towards apex, phialidic. Conidia blastic, subglobose, broad ellipsoid to ellipsoid, seldom irregular, brown to dark brown, walls smooth, becoming thicker with age, base rounded or with truncate basal hilum.
Notes.
Phaeotubakia is proposed as the eleventh genus of Tubakiaceae based on morphological features and phylogeny of combined ITS, LSU, tef1 and tub2 loci (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). Phaeotubakia is distinguished from Apiognomonioides , Ellipsoidisporodochium , Involutiscutellula , Oblongisporothyrium , Obovoideisporodochium , Paratubakia , Racheliella , Saprothyrium and Sphaerosporithyrium by having brown to dark brown conidia ( Braun et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2021). Several species of Tubakia are known to have brown conidia, which is similar to Phaeotubakia lithocarpicola ( Braun et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2022). However, they are phylogenetically distinct (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |