Miagrammopes bifurcatus Dong, Yan, Zhu & Song, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5004.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14C3AE1D-BDB9-4864-831B-765ADECBB932 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5150536 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/273F87D7-7618-FF88-FF48-F3C10887FE73 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Miagrammopes bifurcatus Dong, Yan, Zhu & Song, 2004 |
status |
|
Miagrammopes bifurcatus Dong, Yan, Zhu & Song, 2004 View in CoL
Figures 7–12 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12
Miagrammopes bifurcatus Dong et al. 2004: 66 View in CoL , fig. 2A–C (specimen not examined).
Material examined. 3♂ 1♀ (Ulob-0003–0006- HNU) CHINA, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Chongzuo City, Jiangzhou District , Zuozhou Town , Guanghe Village , Nongheng , 22°34.74'N, 107°24.92'E, 271 m, 29 VIII, 2015, Bing Zhou, Wang Liu, Qu Cai and Jihe Liu leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. The male of this species resembles that of M. scoparius Simon, 1892 in having the similar tibial extend and terminal apophysis ( Figs 8B View FIGURE 8 , 9B View FIGURE 9 ; Chickering, 1968: fig. 36), but can be distinguished by relative narrow and long cymbium with a small hook-shaped apophysis ( Figs 8B View FIGURE 8 , 9B View FIGURE 9 ), while cymbium relative wide and short and without a hook-shaped apophysis in M. scoparius ( Chickering, 1968: fig. 36). The female of this is similar to that of M. auriculatus n. sp. in having similar spermathecae including prolateral bursae, retrolateral bursae and connecting tubes between them both, but can be distinguished by the presence of conspicuous copulatory openings, and longitudinal and almost straight copulatory ducts ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 , 12 View FIGURE 12 ), while copulatory openings inconspicuous and copulatory ducts strongly curved to form a half loop in M. auriculatus n. sp. ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
Description. Male (Ulob-0006-HNU). Total length 4.16, carapace 1.28 long, 0.96 wide, abdomen 2.88 long, 0.55 wide. Carapace ( Fig. 7A, D View FIGURE 7 ) deep brown, approximately oblong, with yellowish longitudinal stripes medially. Anterior eye row absent and posterior eye row straight or slightly recurved. Eye diameters: PME 0.10; PLE 0.10. PME-PME 0.38; PME-PLE 0.26. Chelicerae ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ) yellowish, without teeth, and with tubercular apophyses and bristles along margins of fang groove. Endite ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ) pale yellowish, drop-shaped. Labium ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ) yellowish, lanceolate apically, fused with sternum in the base. Sternum ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ) yellow brown, divided into two unequal parts, with a black longitudinal stripe medially. Leg measurements: I 5.08 (1.80, 0.51, 0.38, 1.84, 0.55); II 2.64 (1.05, 0.26, 0.47, 0.51, 0.35); III 1.63 (0.39, 0.21, 0.46, 0.37, 0.20); IV 3.40 (1.17, 0.33, 1.11, 0.53, 0.26). Leg formula 1423. Leg I ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ) brown, extremely long and strong, with several longitudinal stripes on dorsal sides. Legs –II ( Fig. View FIGURE 7
7A–C) thin and gray, with some brown patches. Tibia of Leg II bearing a few macrosetae dorsally.Abdomen brown, long, with four pairs of grayish spots dorsally.
Palp ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Tibia with terminal extremely developed and extended (tibial extend, TE), equal to cymbium in length, with several some setae dorsally. Cymbium relative narrow and long, with some hairs distally. Tegulum membranous. Sperm duct conspicuous. Embolus transparent, wrapped by radix except distal end. Radix sclerotized, broad at the base and narrow at the distal end. Terminal apophysis divided into two parts, primary terminal apophysis (namely terminal apophysis 1 in Logunov 2018) and secondary terminal apophysis (namely terminal apophysis 2 in Logunov 2018). Terminal apophysis 1 horizontally extended, long and slender, but terminal apophysis 2 longitudinally extended, short and strong.
Female (Ulob-0003-HNU). Total length 5.54, carapace 1.61 long, 1.38 wide, abdomen 3.93 long, 0.99 wide. Eye diameters: PME 0.11; PLE 0.14. PME-PME 0.72; PME-PLE 0.12. Leg I: 10.04 (3.40, 0.82, 2.48, 2.77, 0.57); leg II: 4.46 (1.53, 0.52, 0.90, 1.11, 0.40); leg III: 2.6 (0.68, 0.33, 0.53, 0.67, 0.39); leg IV: 6.02 (1.83, 0.55, 1.80, 1.37, 0.47). Leg formula 1423. General characters as in male, but slightly larger in size and lighter in color.
Epigynum ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 , 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Two copulatory openings conspicuous, situated near the posterior margin of epigynum. Retrolateral bursa (RB) pear-shaped, almost circled by connecting tube. Prolateral bursa (PB) roughly globular, almost as large as RB. Connecting tube (CT) long, strongly bent at the position connecting RB. Copulatory ducts longitudinal, almost parallel to each other, much shorter than CT. Fertilization ducts small, membranous, and with the distal ends slightly far from each other.
Distribution. China (Hainan, Guangxi) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ).
HNU |
Hunan Normal University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Miagrammopes bifurcatus Dong, Yan, Zhu & Song, 2004
Liang, Yun, Cai, Qu, Liu, Jinxin, Yin, Haiqiang & Xu, Xiang 2021 |
Miagrammopes bifurcatus
Dong, S. J. & Yan, P. & Zhu, M. S. & Song, D. X. 2004: 66 |