Micropholcus harajah Huber, 2024

Huber, Bernhard A. & Meng, Guanliang, 2024, Old World Micropholcus spiders, with first records of acrocerid parasitoids in Pholcidae (Araneae), ZooKeys 1213, pp. 95-182 : 95-182

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1213.133178

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B8E6EE1A-023D-4B64-8D3A-C1843F0D8376

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13841456

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/249E0B68-DBB7-4601-81CF-FD7CCFD414AF

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:249E0B68-DBB7-4601-81CF-FD7CCFD414AF

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Micropholcus harajah Huber
status

sp. nov.

Micropholcus harajah Huber sp. nov.

Figs 3 B View Figure 3 , 27 View Figure 27 , 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29 , 30 View Figure 30

Type material.

Holotype. Saudi Arabia – ‘ Asir • ♂; SE of Al Harajah , ‘ site 1 ’; 17.8681 ° N, 43.3943 ° E; 2370 m a. s. l.; 22 Mar. 2024; B. A. Huber leg.; KSMA GoogleMaps . Paratypes. Saudi Arabia – ‘ Asir • 2 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK Ar 24658 and 24659 GoogleMaps .

Other material.

Saudi Arabia – ‘ Asir • 3 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; ZFMK SA 114 GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis.

Distinguished from known congeners by unique shapes of bulbal processes, in particular distinctive prolateral sclerite (arrowed in Fig. 28 D View Figure 28 ; similar only in M. alfara sp. nov.) and by unique subdistal conical projection on hinged process of procursus (arrowed in Fig. 28 C View Figure 28 ); from most congeners (except M. alfara sp. nov. and M. dhahran sp. nov.) also by rectangular hinged process of procursus with obtuse tip and small ventral terminal pointed process and small proximal spine (in other Saudi Arabian species procursus wider and more curved dorsally, without proximal spine; in M. fauroti relatively longer and without spine); from most congeners (except for three species above and M. jacominae and M. darbat sp. nov.) also by long trochanter apophysis (Fig. 27 C View Figure 27 ; longer than palpal femur). Female with unique pair of external epigynal pockets (arrowed in Fig. 30 A View Figure 30 ); with distinct internal crescent shaped structures (Fig. 29 C View Figure 29 ; similar only in M. dhahran sp. nov. and M. alfara sp. nov.), crescent-shaped structures farther apart than in M. alfara sp. nov., and anterior arc narrower and with different curvature than in M. dhahran sp. nov.

Description.

Male (holotype). Measurements. Total body length 2.7, carapace width 0.9. Distance PME - PME 200 µm; diameter PME 80 µm; distance PME - ALE 20 µm; distance AME - AME 25 µm; diameter AME 55 µm. Leg 1: 26.2 (6.5 + 0.5 + 6.4 + 11.6 + 1.2), tibia 2: 4.0, tibia 3: 2.3, tibia 4: 3.3; tibia 1 L / d: 75; diameters of leg femora (at half length) 0.10–0.11; of leg tibiae 0.085.

Colour (in ethanol). Carapace pale ochre-yellow with large brown median mark connected posteriorly to series of small lateral marks, ocular area slightly darkened, clypeus without darker pattern; sternum mostly whitish, posteriorly slightly darkened; legs ochre-yellow, patellae brown, tibia-metatarsus joints with indistinct brown ring, femur 1 proximally slightly darkened; abdomen pale ochre-grey, dorsally and laterally with larger whitish internal marks.

Body. Habitus as in M. dhahran sp. nov. (cf. Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ). Ocular area slightly raised (more distinct in frontal view). Carapace without thoracic groove. Clypeus unmodified. Sternum wider than long (0.66 / 0.50), unmodified. Abdomen oval, approximately twice as long as wide.

Chelicerae. As in Fig. 29 A, B View Figure 29 ; with pair of distal apophyses near laminae, each with two cone-shaped hairs; with pair of very low proximal frontal humps; with prominent pair of proximal lateral processes.

Palps. As in Fig. 27 View Figure 27 ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with very long ventral apophysis with small proximal retrolateral hump and modified hair on distal tip; femur small relative to tibia, distally widened, with distinct ventral hump; femur-patella joints shifted toward prolateral side; tibia-tarsus joints shifted toward retrolateral side; tarsus with large tarsal organ. Procursus (Fig. 28 A – C View Figure 28 ) proximally with sclerotised prolateral hump; at half-length with prolateral-ventral sclerotised ridge, prolateral thick sclerotised ridge, and brush of dorsal hairs; distally with small retrolateral ridge and strong ventral apophysis, large membranous ventral-prolateral flap, and distinctive dorsal hinged process. Genital bulb (Fig. 28 D, E View Figure 28 ) with strong proximal sclerite; two sclerotised processes of unclear homology: prolateral process with distinctive strong pointed cone directed towards bulbous part of genital bulb; retrolateral process originating from basis of embolus, heavily sclerotised with retrolateral row of four variably strong pointed processes; and mostly semi-transparent short embolus with distinct pointed process and subdistal row of transparent hair-like processes prolaterally.

Legs. Without spines, without curved hairs, without sexually dimorphic short vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 not seen in holotype, in paratype at 7 %; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with> 25 pseudosegments, distally distinct.

Variation (male). Tibia 1 in other male: 5.9; missing in third male.

Female. In general very similar to male. Tibia 1 in ten females: 4.3–5.9 (mean 4.9). Epigynum (Fig. 30 A, B View Figure 30 ) variably protruding, anterior plate oval, with indistinct knob-shaped process posteriorly; with pair of lateral sclerites, each provided at posterior end with small pocket, and median internal dark structure visible through cuticle; posterior epigynal plate very short and indistinct. Internal genitalia (Figs 29 C View Figure 29 , 30 C, D View Figure 30 ) with pair of elongated pore plates in transversal position; with pair of lateral sclerites, median crescent-shaped structures, and large membranous anterior arc.

Etymology.

The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.

Distribution.

Known from type locality only, in Saudi Arabia, ‘ Asir Province (Fig. 13 C View Figure 13 ).

Natural history.

The spiders were found sitting on the undersides of large boulders (Fig. 14 A View Figure 14 ), in small cave-like spaces between boulders and between the ground and boulder. Two egg sacs contained ~ 30– 35 eggs each, with an egg diameter of 0.58–0.60 mm.

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Micropholcus