Scytophorus, HERTWIG, 1882
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa176 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D000BAA9-51C4-46FE-AC9B-BB361B601FA2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5752651 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2964E41D-FFB3-FFC6-FC1B-C007FD10B416 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scytophorus |
status |
|
GENUS SCYTOPHORUS HERTWIG, 1882 View in CoL
Diagnosis (after Carlgren, 1949; modifications in italics). Halcampoididae with elongate body and flat aboral end. Column indistinctly divisible into scapus and scapulus. Cuticle developed chiefly on scapus, with modified weak tenaculi more or less visible to the naked eye. No sphincter. Tentacles 14, with longitudinal muscles ectodermal. A single weak, ventral siphonoglyph without conchula. Mesenteries 14, six pairs plus one couple; individual mesenteries of couple with retractors faced towards dorsal pairs of directives, wherefore there is seemingly a single pair of directives. All mesenteries perfect, with retractors strong, restricted to kidneylike. Parietal muscles well developed. As a rule, all mesenteries fertile. Ciliate tracts of filaments may be discontinuous. Cnidom: spirocysts, basitrichs, p -mastigophores A.
Type species: Scytophorus striatus by monotypy.
Included species: Scytophorus antarcticus ( Pfeffer, 1889) and S. striatus .
Remarks: We modified the generic diagnosis by removing the mention of a physa-like structure in members of Scytophorus . Although Hertwig (1882) described S. striatus as lacking a pedal disc and with a round aboral end, all of the S. striatus specimens examined had a distinct flat aboral end ( Figs 6C View Figure 6 , 7A, F View Figure 7 ) as seen attached to solid substrates ( Fig. 6A View Figure 6 ). Although most of the specimens of S. striatus observed had their distal column and oral disc contracted, when they are relaxed, the scapulus can be easily distinguished from the rest of the column (see Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ). We left in the diagnosis the presence of a weak siphonoglyph, but this structure was difficult to observe in dissections ( Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ), histological sections or micro-CT scans ( Fig. 7K View Figure 7 ), as noted by others (e.g. Carlgren, 1921).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |