Procarduelis rubescens Blanford
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/832.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4611759 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4687A0-9E4C-FF84-FD59-762AFC22131E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Procarduelis rubescens Blanford |
status |
|
Procarduelis rubescens Blanford
Procarduelis rubescens Blanford, 1872: 694 , pl. 74 (in Sikkim, in montibus Himalayanis).
Now Carpodacus rubescens ( Blanford, 1872) View in CoL . See Hartert, 1919a: 156; Vaurie, 1956b: 6; Vaurie, 1959: 629; Howell et al., 1968: 268; Dickinson, 2003: 753; and Clement, 2010: 581.
LECTOTYPE: AMNH 710175 About AMNH , adult male, undated, collected in Sikkim by Mandelli. From the Elwes Collection via the Rothschild Collection.
COMMENTS: Blanford did not designate a type in the original description but based his description on a male and a female specimen, noting that the female may be a young male. The specimens were sent to Blanford by Mandelli.
Hartert (1919a: 156) listed the male as the type of rubescens , thereby designating it the lectotype. Rothschild had received this specimen with the Elwes Collection and its label was annotated in Blandford’s hand ‘‘Type described P.Z.S. 1871, p. 693, pl. lxxiv. W.T.B.’’ Hartert did not know what happened to the female, ‘‘which came to Blanford together with the male; probably it has been lost somewhere.’’
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Procarduelis rubescens Blanford
LeCroy, Mary 2013 |
Carpodacus rubescens ( Blanford, 1872 )
Dickinson, E. C. 2003: 753 |
Howell, T. R. & New World & R. A. Paynter, Jr. & A. L. Rand & African 1968: 268 |
Vaurie, C. 1959: 629 |
Vaurie, C. 1956: 6 |
Hartert, E. 1919: 156 |
Procarduelis rubescens
Blanford, W. T. 1872: 694 |