Kokenichthys navis, SCHWARZHANS AND STRINGER, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5070/P940361192. |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B70D32F-9BF0-4595-AF4B-45ADEE03B204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11474202 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4F878B-256B-FF91-FC8D-FD6FFA3AFA15 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Kokenichthys navis |
status |
|
KOKENICHTHYS NAVIS SCHWARZHANS AND STRINGER , 2020b
FIG. 6A View Figure 6
Material— two eroded, but diagnostic, specimens, specimen figured, DMNH 2021-09-9.
Description and Remarks— The sagitta of Kokenichthys navis has several diagnostic features including its very unusual sulcus, which is located almost entirely dorsally. The shape is mainly oval (sensu Smale et al. 1995) with smooth margins. The ventral margins are fairly sharp, and there is a rostrum. The convex inner face has a broad sulcus that appears very shallow and easily eroded. Other specimens of K. navis show similar erosion (see fig. 6 A in Stringer et al. 2020, on the specimens from the Ripley and Owl Creek formations of Mississippi). However, the other specimens in Stringer et al. (2020, fig. 6C–F) are much better preserved, and the ostial and caudal regions are clearly visible. In addition to the Arkadelphia Formation in Arkansas, K.navis is known from the Ripley Formation in Mississippi and possibly in the Tar Heel Formation in North Carolina (Stringer et al. 2018). The species is very abundant in the Ripley Formation at the Blue Springs locality in northeastern Mississippi with 69 specimens (Stringer et al. 2020).
DMNH |
Delaware Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.