Mimosa virginalis Arruda ( Koster 1816: 500 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.544.3.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6524404 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B595F44-FFA1-FFDD-39D3-0F364320BE39 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mimosa virginalis Arruda ( Koster 1816: 500 ) |
status |
|
– Mimosa virginalis Arruda ( Koster 1816: 500) View in CoL , nom. nud.
Mimosa virginalis Arruda was cited by Koster (1816) in a brief comment about the medicinal use of the plant, especially regarding its astringent properties, without mentioning any of its morphological characteristics or anything that can be interpreted as a diagnosis. There is no intention of the author in treating the plant as a new species, or as a species distinct from the remaining Mimosa . According to Stafleu & Cowan (1976), the nomenclatural types of the species described by Arruda da Câmara are unknown, thus it is not possible to confirm the identity of Mimosa virginalis , neither as a synonym of Stryphnodendron adstringens , as frequently recognized.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mimosa virginalis Arruda ( Koster 1816: 500 )
Scalon, Viviane Renata, Paula-Souza, Juliana De, Lima, Alexandre Gibau De & Souza, Vinicius Castro 2022 |
Mimosa virginalis Arruda ( Koster 1816: 500 )
Koster, H. 1816: 500 |