Aceria thomasi ( Nalepa, 1889 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.24349/z3ie-bf78 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2D5C7D00-AE08-CE14-E890-DAA846C7F8AF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2022-10-08 02:31:40, last updated 2022-10-08 02:49:58) |
scientific name |
Aceria thomasi ( Nalepa, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Aceria thomasi ( Nalepa, 1889)
Phytoptus thomasi Nalepa,1889 pp. 135-137 t. 6 f. 1-3.
of telosoma; D – prodorsal shield; E – coxigenital region of female; F – empodium; G – internal genitalia of female.
Phytoptus thomasi: Canestrini,1892 pp. 618-619 t. 49 f. 1; t. 44 f. 8; Cotte,1924 pp. 14-17 pl.
4, f. 19.
Eriophyes thomasi: Liro & Roivainen, 1951 pp. 138-139 .
Aceria thomasi: Farkas, 1965 p. 47 fig. 34D; Boczek & Chyczewski, 1978 p. 112 ; Hellrigl,
2003 p. 100; Amrine & Stasny, 1994 p. 91 ; Szydło et al., 2010 pp. 144-148 figs. 4-6, 12B, Table 1.
( Figs. 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 , Table 1)
Female (n=10) — Body fusiform, 249 (181-292), 68 (62-74) wide, 65 (61-74) thick.
Gnathosoma 23 (19-26), projecting obliquely downwards; chelicerae 20 (16-27), bent down.
Prodorsal shield semicircular in dorsal view, 36 (31-38), 46 (34-55) wide, with a median line complete, broken at anterior 1/3 of prodorsal shield, admedian lines complete, divergent to rear, first submedian lines on anterior 2/3 of prodorsal shield, curving outwards, second submedian lines on anterior 1/2 of prodorsal shield, curving outwards, joining first submedian lines posteriorly, short lines and dots present in lateral area of prodorsal shield; scapular tubercles, 30 (27-32) apart on rear shield margin; scapular setae sc 32 (23-43, n=8), diverging backward.
Leg I 44 (38-48), femur 13 (7-15), femoral setae bv 5 (4–7, n=8) on 1/2 anterior from the base of femur; genu 7 (6-8), genual setae l ″ 15 (10–24, n=7); tibia 9 (8-10), paraxial tibial setae
l ′ 4 (2–6, n=9) on 1/2 anterior from the base of tibia; tarsus 10 (9-11), tarsal solenidion ω 9
(6-10), slightly curved with knob apically, tarsal empodium em 7 (5-9), simple 4–5–rayed.
Leg II 37 (33-42), femur 10 (8-12), femoral setae bv 5 (4–5, n=8) on 1/2 anterior from the base of femur; genu 6 (5-8), genual setae l ″ 6 (4–8, n=9); tibia 7 (5-8); tarsus 9 (7-11), tarsal solenidion ω 8 (6-11), slightly curved with knob apically, tarsal empodium em 6 (4-8), simple 4–5–rayed.
Coxisternal plates with some short lines; prosternal apodeme entire, distinct. Anterior setae on coxisternum I 1b 5 (4-6, n=5), 17 (11-21) apart, ahead of transverse line through proximal setae 1a on coxisternum I, 1a 13 (10-16, n=5), 12 (9-13) apart, ahead of transverse line through proximal setae 2a on coxisternum II, proximal setae 2a 22 (18-27, n=5), 32 (28-33)
apart.
External genitalia 19 (17-22), 31 (29-33) wide; coverflap subtriangular, with 10–12 longitudinal striae; setae 3a 13 (8-16, n=8), 25 (23-29) apart. Coxigenital region with 7-10 semiannuli, microtuberculate.
Opisthosoma with subequal annuli dorsoventrally: 83–94 dorsal annuli with semiellipsoidal microtubercles on the margin, 78–90 ventral annuli with hemispherical microtubercles on the margin; opisthosomal setae c2 13 (10-20, n=8), 68 (55-77) apart on 12–15th annulus;
d 26 (17-35, n=9), 56 (43-64) apart on 29–34th annulus; e 16 (10-22, n=10), 31 (27-34) apart on 47–55th annulus; f 18 (12-24, n=10), 28 (23-32) apart on 7–9th annulus from rear; h1 6
(5-7, n=9), 9 (8-10) apart and h2 49 (35-56, n=4), 13 (12-16) apart.
Male — Not found.
Specimens examined — Ten females on 10 microscopic slides of inventory nos. NHMW29901/1-14 from vial no. 340 and NHMW29902/1 from vial no. 341 in Box TU from the Nalepa mite collection deposited in the NHMW.
Host plant — Thymus serpyllum L.
Other host plants — Thymus pannonicus All. (= T. pulegioides subsp. pannonicus (All.) Kerguélen ) ( Boža, 1983 ; Petanović & Stanković, 1999), Thymus praecox Opiz ( Szydło et al., 2010), Origanum vulgare L. ( Amrine & Stasny,1994) ( Lamiaceae )
Type locality — Austria? (Nalepa Collection Locality. Unknown).
Distribution — Austria ( Hellrigl, 2003), Finland ( Liro & Roivainen, 1951), Germany ( Hellrigl, 2003), Iceland ( Szydło et al., 2010), Italy ( Canestrini, 1892 ; Hellrigl, 2003), Montenegro ( Jočić & Petanović, 2012), Poland ( Boczek & Chyczewski, 1978 ; Skoracka et al., 2005), Serbia ( Boža, 1983 ; Petanović & Stanković, 1999).
Relation to host —According to Nalepa (1889), the mite causes white erineum on blister with a diameter of 5-8 mm on leaves and flowers of Thymus serpyllum .
Remarks — The range of body length and width Aceria of thomasi ( Nalepa, 1889) (original data) almost overlapped with both that of the topotype specimens (present data) and that of specimens collected from Iceland ( Szydło et al., 2010). The measurements of all taxonomic characters except setae were not almost different between that of topotype specimens (present data) and that of specimens from Iceland ( Szydło et al., 2010), but the lengths of most setae measurements of topotype specimens were relatively a little shorter than that of specimens from Iceland ( Table 1).
Amrine J. W. Jr., Stasny T. A. H. 1994. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea of the World. Michigan, USA: Indira Publishing House. pp. ix + 798.
Boczek J., Chyczewski, J. 1978. Eriophyid mites (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) occurring on weed plants in Poland. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych, Ser. E 7: 109 - 114.
Boza P. 1983. Prilog poznavanju cecidofaune zeljastih biljaka Vojvodine. Matica srpska, Zbornik za prirodne nauke, 65: 131 - 140.
Canestrini G. 1892. Prospetto dell'Acarofauna Italiana. Parte Va. Famiglia dei Phytoptini (Phytoptidae).
Cotte J. 1924. Les cecidies des Alpes Maritimes et leurs producteur. Memoires de la Societe Linneenne de Marseille, 3: 1 - 56.
Farkas H. 1965. Familie Eriophyidae, Gallmilben. In: Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Bd. 3, Lief 3, Verlag von Quelle and Meyer, Leipzig. pp. 155.
Hellrigl K. 2003. Faunistik der Gallmilben Sudtirols (Acari? Eriophyoidea). Gredleriana, 3: 77 - 142. https: // www. zobodat. at / pdf / Gredleriana _ 003 _ 0077 - 0142. pdf
Jocic I., Petanovic P. 2012. Checklist of the eriophyoid mite fauna of Montenegro (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea). Acta Entomologica Serbica, 17: 141 - 166. Available fromhttp: // aes. bio. bg. ac. rs / index. php / aes / article / view / 75
Liro J. I., Roivainen H. 1951. Akamapunkit Eriophyidae. Suomen Elaimet- Animalia Fennica 6. Poorvo- Helsinki, W. Soderstrom Osakeyhtio. pp. 281.
Nalepa A. 1889. Beitrage zur Systematik der Phytopten. Sitz. kais. Akad. Wiss., Math. - natur. Kl., Wien, Abt. 1, 98 (1): 112 - 156.
Petanovic R., Stankovic S. 1999. Catalogue of Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata) of Serbia and Montenegro. Acta Entomologica Serbica. Special Issue, pp. 143.
Skoracka A., Lewandowski M., Boczek J. 2005. A Catalogue of Eriophyoid Mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) of Poland. Warszawa, Poland: Natura optima dux Foundation. pp. 199.
Szydlo W., Skaftaso J. F., Skoracka A. 2010. Eriophyoid mites (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea: Eriophyidae) from Iceland: one new species, and three new mite records. Annales Zoologici (Warszawa), 60: 139 - 157. https: // doi. org / 10.3161 / 000345410 X 499623
Figure 2 Drawing ofAceria thomasi (Nalepa, 1889) (female). A – antero-lateral view of body; B – lateral view of abdomen; C – lateral view
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aceria thomasi ( Nalepa, 1889 )
Kadono, Fujio, Takei, Madoka, Gotoh, Tetsuo, Kubota, Kenji, Hörweg, Christoph & Kagiwada, Satoshi 2022 |
Aceria thomasi
: Farkas 1965: 47 |
Eriophyes thomasi:
Liro & Roivainen 1951: 138 - 139 |
Phytoptus thomasi:
Canestrini 1892: 618 - 619 |
Phytoptus thomasi
Nalepa 1889: 135 - 137 |