Aulacophora indica ( Gmelin, 1790 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3949.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28B64406-0249-4289-B4C5-66E794D5435D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6097593 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2D5C8028-315D-7B2D-FF76-F7BCFA8CFB92 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aulacophora indica ( Gmelin, 1790 ) |
status |
|
Aulacophora indica ( Gmelin, 1790)
( Figs 37–43 View FIGURES 35 – 43 , 52–61 View FIGURES 52 – 61 )
Crioceris testacea Fabricius, 1787: 87 ( India) ; Fabricius, 1792: 4 (redescription).
Aulacophora testacea: Baly, 1879: 445 ( India: Assam); Baly, 1886: 13; Allard, 1888: 320 ( Indonesia: Celebes = Sulawesi);
Cryptocephalus (Crioceris) indica Gmelin, 1790: 1720 . (replacement name for Crioceris testacea Fabricius, 1787 )
Rhaphidopalpa indica: Laboissière, 1940: 10 .
Aulacophora indica: Kimoto, 1970: 416 ( Nepal) ; Kimoto, 1977: 354 ( Bhutan); Kimoto, 1989: 57 ( India, including Andaman and Nicobar islands, Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Philippines, Japan, including Ryukyu islands, Korea, Russia, Indonesia: Sunda islands, Micronesia, New Guinea, Samoa, Fiji); Mohamedsaid, 1994: 381 ( Malaysia); Mohamedsaid, 2000: 348 ( Malaysia); Barroga, 2001: 42 ( Indonesia: Bali); Barroga & Mohamedsaid, 2002: 102 ( Indonesia: Sumatra, Nias, Buru, Java); Mohamedsaid & Constant, 2007: 166 ( Thailand, Cambodia); Aston, 2009: 13 ( China: Hong Kong).
Galeruca similis Olivier, 1808: 624 (Océan Indien); Kimoto, 1989: 56 (as synonym of indica ).
Aulacophora similis: Baly, 1886: 16 ( China, Japan, India, Malaysia); Jacoby, 1889: 206 ( Burma); Duvivier, 1892: 430 ( India: Konbir); Chûjô, 1938: 152 ( Taiwan); Gressitt, 1955: 28 ( Micronesia).
Rhaphidopalpa similis: Allard, 1889: 308 ( Vietnam: Hué, Saigon = Ho Chi Minh City, Mytho, Qui Nhon, Tourane; Cambodia: Pnom Penh); Allard, 1891: 230 ( Laos: Luang Prabang).
Orthaulaca similis: Weise, 1892: 393 .
Ceratia similis: Miwa, 1931: 190 ( Taiwan) .
Raphidopalpa femoralis Motschulsky, 1857: 37 ( Japan) ; Baly, 1886: 16 (as synonym of similis ); Weise, 1892: 395 ( Philippines); Ogloblin, 1936: 154 ( Korea).
Aulacophora femoralis: Schönfeldt, 1890: 174 ( Japan: Ryukyus); Chûjô, 1941: 157 ( Japan, Korea); Gressitt & Kimoto, 1963: 486 ( China, Vietnam); Kimoto, 1966: 28 ( Taiwan).
Rhaphidopalpa coffeae: Allard, 1888: 319 ( Japan; misidentification); Weise, 1892: 395 (as synonym of similis ).
Aulacophora flavipes Jacoby, 1883: 202 ( Indonesia: Sulawesi: Saleyar islands); Baly, 1886: 17 (as synonym of similis ).
Rhaphidopalpa pubescens Allard, 1888: 306 ( Annam) . New synonym
Aulacophora pubescens: Kimoto, 1989: 62 .
Rhaphidopalpa bengalensis Weise, 1892: 394 ( India: Calcutta).
Rhaphidopalpa ceramensis Weise, 1892: 394 ( Indonesia: Ceram island; Borneo); Laboissière, 1932: 153 ( Indonesia: Halmaheira); Barroga & Mohamedsaid, 2002: 103 (as synonym of indica ).
Rhaphidopalpa niasiensis Weise, 1892: 394 ( Indonesia: Nias and Sumatra); Barroga and Mohamedsaid, 2002: 103 (as synonym of indica ).
Rhaphidopalpa chinensis Weise, 1892: 395 ( China: Shanghai); Ogloblin, 1936: 153 ( Vietnam, Mongolia); Laboissière, 1940: 13 ( India: Tetara); Gressitt & Kimoto, 1963: 486 (as synonym of femoralis ).
Aulacophora femoralis chinensis: Chen & Kung, 1959: 375 ( China: Hebei, Shaanxi, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guandong, Guanxi, Hubei, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Yunnan).
Type material. Crioceris testacea : lectotype ♂ ( KIEL), here designated, without labels (see remarks on A. abdominalis ).
Galeruca similis : most of Olivier’s were in very bad condition before given to MNHN in 1995. The types probaly have been destroyed by pests. (Mantilleri personal communication).
Aulacophora flavipes : holotype ♀ ( MCZC), labeled: “H.E.D. / Engelhard / Saleyer / 20/1, 81 [w, h, round label] // 1st Jacoby / Coll. [w, p] // ♀ [b, h] // Type [p] / 17561 [r, h]”.
Rhaphidopalpa pubescens : lectotype ♂ ( MNHN), here designated, labeled: “wchinchine [h, w] // Ex.Musaeo / 1899 [vertical] / E.ALLARD [p, w] // MUSEUM PARIS / 1952 / COLL. OBERTHUR [p, w] // TYPE [p,r] // Rhaphidopalpa / Pubescens All. / Cochinchine [p, y]”.
Rhaphidopalpa bengalensis : lectotype ♂ (MNHUB), here designated, labeled: “Calcutta / Hauser [w, h] // India or. / Calcutta [w, p] // ♂ [w, h] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / bengalensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”. Paralectotype: 1♀ (MNHUB), labeled: “Calcutta [w, h] / bengalensis / Ws. [w, h] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / bengalensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”.
Raphidopalpa femoralis : not studied. They should be deposited at the ZMUM.
Rhaphidopalpa ceramensis : Lectotype ♀ (MNHUB), here designated, labeled: “Ceram / Jllo [w, h] // ex Coll. / J. Weise [w, p] // ceramensis / Ws. [w, h] // Type [r, p] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / ceramensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”. Paralectotypes: 1♂, 1♀ (MNHUB), labeled: “Ceram / Ribbe [w, h] // ex Coll. / J. Weise [w, p] // Type [r, p] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / ceramensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”; 1♂ (MNHUB), labeled: “Ceram / Jllo [w, h] // ex Coll. / J. Weise [w, p] // Type [r, p] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / ceramensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”; 1♀ (MNHUB), labeled: “ex Coll. / J. Weise [w, p] // Type [r, p] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / ceramensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”; 1♀ (MNHUB), labeled: “Ceram / Jllo / C. Ribbe 1884 [w, p] // ex Coll. / J. Weise [w, p] // Type [r, p] // SYNTYPUS / Rhaphidopalpa / ceramensis Weise, 1892 / labelled by MNHUB 2014 [r, p]”.
Rhaphidopalpa niasiensis : Weise’s types were originally deposited at the MNHUB. They was studied and borrowed by Barroga and Mohamedsaid (2002), and lost during return of the specimens (Willers personal communication).
Rhaphidopalpa chinensis : lectotype ♂ (MNHUB), here designated, labeled: “Shanghai / Simon [w, h] // ♂ [w, h] // chinensis / Ws. [w, h]”.This is the only specimen available in Weise’s collection. It is uncertain if there are other type specimens.
Other specimens examined. CAMBODIA. 1♂, Siem Reap, 7–11.XI.2002, leg. P. Kočák ( JBCB); CHINA. Fujian: 1♀, Changting, Hotien, 19.IV.1941, leg. T. C. Maa ( BPBM); 1♀, Chishui, 20.VI.2014, leg. Y.-T. Chung ( TARI); 1♀, Shaowu, Tachulan, 11.VI.1942, leg. T. Maa ( BPBM); Guandong: 1♂, Lochang, Tintong, 18.VIII.1947, leg. L. Gressitt ( BPBM); Hainan: 1♂, Fan Heang, 7.VI.1935, leg. J. L. Gressitt ( BPBM); 1♂, Tiaoloshan, 6.V.2011, leg. Y.-T. Chung ( TARI); Hong Kong: 1♂, Lantau, Mui Wo, 24.IX.2005, leg. P. Aston ( PAHC); Hubei: 1♂, Wang-ga-ying, Lichuan, 23.IX.1948, leg. Gressitt & Djou ( BPBM); Sichuan: 1♂, Wanhsien, 3.X.1948, leg. Gressitt & Djou ( BPBM); INDONESIA. Sumatra: Riau: 2♂, Bukit Tigapuluh N. P., 18–25.I.2000, leg. J. Bezdĕk ( JBCB); JAPAN. Okinawa: 1♀, Okinawa island, 8.IV.2014, leg. Y.-T. Wang ( TARI); 1♀, Yonaguni island, 28.III.2014, leg. Y.-T. Wang ( TARI); LAOS. Hua Phan: 1♂, Ban Kangpabong env., 25 km SE of Vient Xai, 14–18.V.2001, leg. J. Bezdĕk ( JBCB); Khammouane: 1♂, Phon tiou, 6.VII.1965, leg. native collector ( BPBM); 1♀, same locality, 11.IX.1965, leg. native collector ( BPBM); Vientiane: 1♂, Tha Ngone, 20.XI.1965, leg. native collector ( BPBM); 1♂, Vientiane, 31.VII.1965, leg. native collector ( BPBM); 1♀, same locality, 21.III.1966, leg. native collector ( BPBM); MALAYSIA. Johor: 1♂, 15 km NW of Kota Tinggi, Muntahak Mt., 13–14.V.2001, leg. M. Řiha ( JBCB); PHILIPPINES. Batanes: 4♂, 4♀, Itbayat island, 13.IV.2013, leg. Y.-F. Hsu ( TARI); 1♀, Sabtang island, 11.IV.2013, leg. Y.-F. Hsu ( TARI); SOUTH KOREA. 2♂, Jeju-do, Jeju-si, Hwabuk-dong, 28.X.2009, leg. H.-W. Cho ( JBCB); THAILAND. Chiangmai: 1♂, Chiangdao, 5–11.IV.1958, leg. T. C. Maa ( BPBM); Nakornsawan: 1♀, 12.IX.1963 ( BPBM); TAIWAN. Ilan: 1♂, Taipingthan, 3.VII.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou ( TARI); 1♂, Toucheng, 30.V.2009, leg. H.-J. Chen ( TARI); Kaoshiung: 1♀, Meinung, 20.XII.2011, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); 4♂, 6♀, same locality, 17.II.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); 5♂, 4♀, Hsiaokangshan, 9.III.2013, leg. B.-X. Guo ( TARI); 3♂, Yuangan, 16.IV.2013, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); Kinmen: 1♂, 1♀, Kinmen island, 11.VII.2001, leg. H.- T. Shih ( TARI); Pingtung: 1♂, Checheng, 6.II.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); 1♂, Chiehchihlaishan, 14.II.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); 2♂, 3♀, Fengchuisha, 29.IV.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); 1♂, Lilungshan, 10.III.2014, leg. Y.- T. Chung ( TARI); 1♂, Neiwen, 30.X.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ( TARI); Taipei: 3♀, Linshanpi, 15.IX.2007, leg. S.-F. Yu ( TARI); 1♀, Manyuehyuan, 9.IX.2011, leg. C.-F. Lee ( TARI); 1♀, Menghuanhu, 28.VII.2007, leg. M.-H. Tsou ( TARI); 8♂, Pinglin, 8.VII.2008, leg. H.-J. Chen ( TARI); 1♀, Sanchih, 11.III.2010, leg. W.-T. Liu ( TARI); 1♂, Wanli, 4.VII.2008, leg. W.-T. Liu ( TARI); Taitung: 1♀, Lanyu island, 22–26.III.1998, leg. C.-F. Lee ( TARI); 1♀, same locality, 27.VI.2010, leg. H.-H. Lee ( TARI); 1♀, same locality, 4.IV.2011, leg. Y.-T. Wang ( TARI); 5♂, 5♀, same locality, 17.III.2012, leg. M.-H. Tsou ( RBCN, TARI); 5♂, 5♀, same locality, 17.III.2012, leg. T.-H. Lee ( MCSN, MNHUB); 1♀, same locality, 5.V.2012, leg. S.-F. Yu ( TARI); 1♀, same locality, 14.IV.2013, leg. Y.-T. Chung ( TARI); 10♂, 12♀, Lutao island, 14.IV.2014, leg. Y.-T. Chung ( TARI); 1♂, Taimali, 21.X.2009, leg. W.-T. Liu ( TARI); Taoyuan: 1♀, Fuhsing, 15.VII.2009, leg. H.-J. Chen ( TARI); 2♂, 3♀, Lofu, 11.IV.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou ( TARI); 1♂, Paling, 11.IV.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou ( TARI); THAILAND. Mae Hong Son: 1♂, 1♀, Soppong env., 600 m, 28.V.–2.VI.1999, leg. M. Řiha ( JBCB); VIETNAM. 1♀, Ap Hung-Lam, 21 km NW of Dilinh, 29.IX– 5.X.1960, leg. C. M. Yoshimoto ( BPBM); 1♂, Nha Trang, 17–26.XI.1960, leg. C. M. Yoshimoto ( BPBM).
Diagnosis. See diagnosis of Aulacophora abdominalis .
Males. Length 6.5–8.0 mm, width 3.3–4.0 mm. General color ( Figs 37–38 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ) yellowish brown but metathoracic and abdominal ventrites black except apex of fifth abdominal ventrite; middle and hind legs black; outer margins of femur and tibia of front legs black; labrum dark brown; antenna dark brown except three basal antennomeres yellowish brown. Antenna ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) filiform and slender, antennomere I enlarged; ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 1.0: 1.0: 1.2; ratio of length to width from antennomere III to XI about 2.6: 3.0: 3.2: 3.0: 3.1: 3.0: 3.1: 3.7: 4.4. Pronotum with deep, transverse groove. Elytra with cluster of erect hairs behind humerus. Abdominal tergite VIII well sclerotized ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ), apical margin bifurcate and apices cute; with one small process at lateral margin. Median lobe of fifth abdominal ventrite rectangular, disc depressed at left side. Penis ( Figs 54–55 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) slender, parallel-sided, asymmetric and abruptly narrowed at apical 1/7 and apically tapering, apex recurved; almost straight in lateral view; tectum medially sclerotized, apically tapering; endophallus with clusters of short setae, and with one longitudinal sclerite, apically tapering, apex strongly curved in lateral view, basally widened.
Females. Length 6.8–8.2 mm, width 3.4–4.1 mm. Similar to male ( Figs 39–40 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ), but pronotum with transverse groove shallow; cluster of erect hairs on elytra absent; antennomere I not enlarged ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ); ratio of length of antennomeres III to XI about 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 0.9: 0.9: 0.9: 0.9: 0.9: 1.1; ratio of length to width from antennomere III to XI about 3.5: 3.7: 3.3: 3.3: 3.3: 3.3: 3.5: 3.5: 4.5. Pygidium projecting from elytral apex, apically tapering, apex pointed, or truncate, or emarginate. Middle of apical margin of abdominal ventrite V ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) emarginate. Gonocoxae ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) slender, apex of each gonocoxa with eight setae from apical 1/6 to apex; gonocoxae connected at middle, base slender. Ventrite VIII ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) weakly sclerotized; apex narrowly rounded, with dense short setae along apex; spiculum short. Spermathecal receptaculum ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 52 – 61 ) a little swollen; pump strongly curved; spermathecal duct short, stout, shallowly projecting into receptaculum.
Variation. Although most of the females have pointed pygidia, few have truncate or emarginate ones. Color of middle and hind legs are also variable among different populations. Black middle and hind legs occur in Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, and Indonesia, while yellow ones ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ) in India, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. Both color forms occur in China. Some exceptions could occur in small populations, such as adults with yellow legs occur in Saleyar islands.
Remarks. The type (s) of Crioceris testacea is mixed with those of C. abdominalis in the Fabricius collection (KIEL). One male is designated as the lectotype to serve nomenclatural stability. This specimen ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 35 – 43 ) fits the current definition of Aulacophora indica and the color patterns (yellow legs) in India. For more details on the designation of this lectotype see under remarks in the section on A. abdominalis . In addition, Kimoto (1989) indicated that Rhaphidopalpa pubsecens should belong to another genus with dense hairs on the dorsal surface although the type was not studied. Actually the character indicated by Kimoto (1989) is the erect haris behind the humerus of the male since this type is deposited at the MNHN and regarded as a junior synonym of Aulacophor indica after studying its aedeagus.
Host plants. Cucurbitaceae : including cultivated species.
Distribution. Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Laos, Malaysia, Micronesia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Russia, Samoa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aulacophora indica ( Gmelin, 1790 )
Lee, Chi-Feng & Beenen, Ron 2015 |
Aulacophora pubescens:
Kimoto 1989: 62 |
Aulacophora indica:
Aston 2009: 13 |
Mohamedsaid 2007: 166 |
Barroga 2002: 102 |
Barroga 2001: 42 |
Mohamedsaid 2000: 348 |
Mohamedsaid 1994: 381 |
Kimoto 1989: 57 |
Kimoto 1977: 354 |
Kimoto 1970: 416 |
Aulacophora femoralis chinensis:
Chen 1959: 375 |
Rhaphidopalpa indica: Laboissière, 1940 : 10
Laboissiere 1940: 10 |
Ceratia similis:
Miwa 1931: 190 |
Orthaulaca similis:
Weise 1892: 393 |
Rhaphidopalpa bengalensis
Weise 1892: 394 |
Rhaphidopalpa ceramensis
Barroga 2002: 103 |
Laboissiere 1932: 153 |
Weise 1892: 394 |
Rhaphidopalpa niasiensis
Barroga 2002: 103 |
Weise 1892: 394 |
Rhaphidopalpa chinensis
Gressitt 1963: 486 |
Laboissiere 1940: 13 |
Ogloblin 1936: 153 |
Weise 1892: 395 |
Aulacophora femoralis: Schönfeldt, 1890 : 174
Kimoto 1966: 28 |
Gressitt 1963: 486 |
Chujo 1941: 157 |
Schonfeldt 1890: 174 |
Rhaphidopalpa similis:
Allard 1891: 230 |
Allard 1889: 308 |
Rhaphidopalpa coffeae:
Weise 1892: 395 |
Allard 1888: 319 |
Rhaphidopalpa pubescens
Allard 1888: 306 |
Aulacophora similis:
Gressitt 1955: 28 |
Chujo 1938: 152 |
Duvivier 1892: 430 |
Jacoby 1889: 206 |
Baly 1886: 16 |
Raphidopalpa femoralis
Ogloblin 1936: 154 |
Weise 1892: 395 |
Baly 1886: 16 |
Aulacophora flavipes
Baly 1886: 17 |
Jacoby 1883: 202 |
Aulacophora testacea:
Allard 1888: 320 |
Baly 1886: 13 |
Baly 1879: 445 |
Galeruca similis
Kimoto 1989: 56 |
Olivier 1808: 624 |
Cryptocephalus (Crioceris) indica
Gmelin 1790: 1720 |
Crioceris testacea
Fabricius 1792: 4 |
Fabricius 1787: 87 |