Etherella tibetensis, Ernst, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/585 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6F0DE44D-32BD-4882-9C38-FF76446D15EA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2F15F14D-FF83-FF8F-069C-AB5BFAD1F9E0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Etherella tibetensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Etherella tibetensis View in CoL n. sp.
Figures 9.6 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 ; Table 11
zoobank.org/ 1610F4FA-934D-4255-ADF6-1DFF0931FBA1
Etymology. The species is named after its occurrence in Tibet.
Holotype. SMF 23.214 About SMF .
Paratypes. SMF 23.215 About SMF – SMF 23.223 About SMF , SMF 23.230 About SMF , SMF 23.231 About SMF , SMF 23.267 About SMF .
Type locality. Zhongba area of southwestern Tibet (E 83.76894, N 29.93333) GoogleMaps .
Type stratum. Zhongba Formation, Permian (upper Cisuralian–Guadalupian).
Diagnosis. Reticulate colonies formed by fused branches; branches bifoliate, lenticular, rounded to oval in transverse section; fenestrules circular to oval; autozooecia arranged in 8–10 rows on branches; lunaria absent; vesicular skeleton scarcely developed, vesicles small; extrazooecial skeleton well-developed; monticules absent.
Description. Studied material represent a bifoliate reticulate colon split in the plane of mesotheca ( Figures 9.6 View FIGURE 9 , 10.8 View FIGURE 10 ). Branches 2.8–5.1 mm wide and 8.0– 10.3 mm thick, rounded to oval in transverse section. Fenestrules circular to oval, 1.6–3.3 mm wide and 2.1–4.0 mm long. Autozooecia tubular, long, rhombically arranged in 8–10 longitudinal rows on branches, lacking on lateral sides of branches; subquadrate, trapezoid to subhemispherical in transverse section at mesotheca; angular shaped in deep tangential section in mid exozone and partially isolated by vesicles. Long and thin hook-shaped superior hemisepta present at the transition between endo- and exozone, curved proximally, club-shaped. Basal diaphragms rare. Mesotheca consisting of granular-prismatic material, straight, 0.02–0.03 mm thick; median tubules present, 0.015 –0.030 mm in diameter; longitudinal ridges absent. Autozooecial walls granular-prismatic, 0.015 –0.040 mm thick. Autozooecial apertures arranged regularly in 9–13 diagonal rows on branches, rounded to oval. Lunaria absent. Vesicular skeleton well-developed, restricted to exozone; vesicles blister-like, low to moderately high with flat to rounded roofs, polygonal in tangential section. Extrazooecial skeleton well-developed, displaying cloudy structure produced by stabshaped elements. Acanthostyles absent. Monticules absent.
Remarks. Etherella tibetensis n. sp. differs from Etherella porosa Crockford, 1957 and E. porosa minor Crockford, 1957 from the Lower Permian (Artinskian–Kungurian) of Western Australia, in having larger and more closely spaced autozooecial apertures as well as an extremely thick extrazooecial skeleton. Etherella tibetensis n. sp. shows intermediate dimensions of colony elements comparable to both Australian species:
Etherella porosa —branch width: 4.0– 5.5 mm;
fenestrule width: 3.0–5.0 mm; fenestrule length:
5.0–7.0 mm; aperture width: 0.13–0.16 mm;
aperture spacing: 0.5–0.7 mm.
Etherella porosa minor —branch width: 2.0–3.3
mm; fenestrule width: 2.0– 2.5 mm; fenestrule length: 2.0– 3.5 mm; aperture width: 0.14 mm;
aperture spacing: 0.50–0.83 mm.
Etherella tibetensis —branch width: 2.8–5.1
mm; fenestrule width: 1.6–3.3 mm; fenestrule length: 2.1–4.0 mm; aperture width: 0.12–0.21
mm (0.17 mm at average); aperture spacing:
0.45–0.66 mm (0.53 mm at average).
The species Coscinotrypa orientalis Sakagami, 1968 from the Permian of Khao Ta Mong Rai, Thailand, may belong to Etherella . It shows oval apertures without lunaria, scarce vesicular skeleton and extensive extrazooecial skeleton. However, the presence of the hook-shaped hemisepta cannot be confirmed on that material because the part of the colony at mesotheca is strongly affected by diagenesis. This species also possesses larger autozooecial apertures (average autozooecial width 0.24 mm vs. 0.17 mm in E. tibetensis ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |