Holopodidae Zittel, 1879
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5541.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F812F60-9242-4F44-8E25-99381FD7E8B3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14248385 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2F1AC921-FFC6-FFC5-F2F0-FA3FFCB65BD3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Holopodidae Zittel, 1879 |
status |
|
Family Holopodidae Zittel, 1879 View in CoL
Remarks. Sieverts-Doreck (1951) believed that some ossicles and deformed Eugeniacrinus cups figured by Remeš (1902: pl. 19, figs. 11 a–c, 12–15) from the Štramberk Tithonian could belong to an Upper Jurassic species of Cyathidium . However, the figure is too imprecise to confirm an attribution to Holopodidae . The mere inclusion of Cyathidium depressum in a long list of cyrtocrinids cited from Lower Cretaceous Štramberk-type limestones ( Salamon & Gorzelak 2010: 871) cannot be taken into account without a critical analysis of the material concerned. Moreover, the attribution to C. senessei (Valette in Lambert & Valette, 1934) of a very poorly preserved axillary from the Santonian of Poland by Salamon and Gorzelak (2011: 311, fig. 2C, D) is highly questionable. Here, we consider that the appearance of Holopodidae prior to the Cenomanian has not been demonstrated.
It appears that the H/Wd ratio of IBrax is the best quantitative character to discriminate between the two genera in the family (> 0.7 in Holopus , <0.7 in Cyathidium ) ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
Stratigraphic distribution. Upper Cenomanian–Recent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.