Meligethes
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D799B75B-3D1C-4510-BC0E-5CB2673A9086 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087287 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/30440375-FFFA-FFD6-B0C2-69A0E66FA390 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meligethes |
status |
|
Meligethes View in CoL View at ENA (s.str.) aureolineatus Audisio, Sabatelli & Jelínek, 2015
( Figs. 9–10 View FIGURES 9 – 16 , 30 View FIGURES 30 – 33 )
Taxonomic remarks. Meligethes aureolineatus was described from a single female specimen devoid of an ovipositor. This species is member of the M. binotatus-auripilis group (as delimited by Audisio et al. 2015), where it appears to be more closely related to members of the M. auripilis complex. This species is likely sister to the rather isolated M. aurifer Audisio, Sabatelli & Jelínek, 2015 from Shaanxi and Shanxi. These two species share uniformly blackish or nut-brown body coloration ( Figs. 30–31 View FIGURES 30 – 33 ), combined with yellowish-orange legs and antennae, and rather long and uniform dorsal pubescence.
The recent availability of a second specimen (a male) from the type locality ( China, Sichuan Province, Jiuzhaigou Valley near Zhangzha) allowed for the description of the unknown male genitalia. The male genitalia ( Figs. 9–10 View FIGURES 9 – 16 ) are characterized by a median lobe of the aedeagus similar to that of M. aurifer ( Figs. 11–12 View FIGURES 9 – 16 ), long (ratio LEAE/WIAE = 2.22), narrowly spatulate and minutely incised distad (narrowly spatulate but slightly emarginate distad and shorter in M. aurifer , ratio LEAE/WIAE = 2.00–2.10: Figs. 10, 12 View FIGURES 9 – 16 ), combined with characteristically shaped tegmen, exhibiting a relatively deep, widely U-shaped distal excision (ratio DTIN/LETE ≈ 0.28), with rather pointed apices of the paramera (the tegmen exhibiting a more widely V-shaped and shallower excision, ratio DTIN/LETE ≈ 0.25, in M. aurifer : Figs. 9, 11 View FIGURES 9 – 16 ).
Meligethes aurifer exhibits an uniformly colored (blackish-brown, bronze to olivaceous) dorsum covered by uniform and moderately long silvery to golden pubescence ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30 – 33 ), while M. aureolineatus exhibits an uniformly colored brown (nut-brown to bronze) dorsum with rather long golden dorsal pubescence on head and pronotum, associated with shorter and brownish elytral pubescence, and with a characteristic series of well-defined longitudinal and narrow creamy stripes on each elytron (the first lateral, the second discal, the third sutural), formed by short but dense creamy pubescence ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30 – 33 ). Female genitalia of M. aureolineatus remain unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |