Pseudodysderina, Platnick & Berniker, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/3776.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4565799 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3206DA49-8B3E-FFE7-FE06-326DFB77FC29 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudodysderina |
status |
|
KEY TO SPECIES OF PSEUDODYSDERINA View in CoL
1. Males (unknown in P. hermani View in CoL ).....................................................................................................2
– Females (unknown in P. dracula View in CoL )...................................................................................................8
2. Chelicerae each with elaborate anterior process (fig. 125).............................................. dracula View in CoL
– Chelicerae without anterior process..............................................................................................3
3. Conductor much shorter than embolus (fig. 140)................................................................ suiza View in CoL
– Conductor longer..............................................................................................................................4
4. Embolus relatively wide at point where terminal projection originates (fig. 66)...... desultrix
– Embolus narrower at that point (as in fig. 78).............................................................................5
5. Lobe on retrolateral side of conductor relatively wide, conspicuous (figs. 78, 90).................6
– Lobe on retrolateral side of conductor slim or absent (figs. 102, 114).....................................7 6. Conductor distally bifid, with prolateral and retrolateral lobes (figs. 89, 90)............... yungas View in CoL
– Conductor entire, without retrolateral lobe (figs. 77, 78)................................................... manu View in CoL
7. Projection on prolateral side of conductor long, sharp (fig. 102)........................................ beni View in CoL
– Projection on prolateral side of conductor shorter (fig. 114)........................................... utinga View in CoL
8. Postepigastric scutum separated from epigastric scutum at its anterolateral corners (fig. 143) ..................................................................................................................................................... suiza View in CoL
– Postepigastric scutum fused to epigastric scutum.......................................................................9
9. Anterior genitalic process greatly widened at tip (figs. 84, 96, 120).....................................10
– Tip of anterior genitalic process narrower (figs. 72, 108, 134)................................................12
10.Anterior genitalic process with triangular basal sclerotization (figs. 84, 96)........................11
– Anterior genitalic process without distinct basal sclerotization (fig. 120)...................... utinga View in CoL
11.Genital atrium relatively long (fig. 83).................................................................................. manu View in CoL
– Genital atrium relatively short (fig. 95)............................................................................... yungas View in CoL
12.Anterior margin of genital atrium heavily sclerotized (figs. 71, 133).....................................13
– Anterior margin of genital atrium weakly sclerotized (fig. 107).......................................... beni View in CoL
13.Posterior margin of genital atrium weakly sclerotized, apodemes relatively long (fig. 72)..... .............................................................................................................................................. desultrix
– Posterior margin of genital atrium heavily sclerotized, apodemes relatively short (fig. 134). ............................................................................................................................................... hermani View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.