Myxas glutinosa (O.F. Mueller , 1774)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.52860 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B8CF4E84-1FEE-46F3-B275-BAFA6824902B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/32E44F5B-FB2C-5A31-88A3-4470BE0BCECE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Myxas glutinosa (O.F. Mueller , 1774) |
status |
|
22. Myxas glutinosa (O.F. Mueller, 1774) Fig. 9E View Figure 9 ; Table 3.
Buccinum glutinosum O.F. Müller 1774: 129.
Amphipeplea dupuyi Locard 1893: 30.
Amphipeplea mabillei Locard 1893: 30.
Lymnaea glutinosa - Hubendick 1951: 148, fig. 333.
Lymnaea (Myxas) dupuyi - Kruglov and Starobogatov 1985b: 74, figs 1(3), 2(3); 1993b: 171, fig. 9D (partim).
Lymnaea (Myxas) glutinosa - Kruglov and Starobogatov 1985b: 73, figs 1(2), 2(2); 1993b: 171, fig. 9B (partim).
Lymnaea (Myxas) mabillei - Kruglov and Starobogatov 1985b: 71, figs 1(1), 2(1); 1993b: 171, fig. 9A (partim).
Myxas glutinosa - Glöer 2002: 220, fig. 248; Welter-Schultes 2012: 50, textfig.; Vinarski and Kantor 2016: 316; Glöer 2019: 249, fig. 310.
TL.
Not stated in the original description. Most probably, the type locality should be quoted as Fridrichsdal, a suburb of Copenhagen, Denmark (see Nekhaev et al. 2015 for details).
Types.
Lost ( Nekhaev et al. 2015).
The taxonomic position and identity of this morphologically-peculiar species have not raised many doubts and most authors treated it more or less identically ( Hubendick 1951; Glöer 2002; Welter-Schultes 2012; but see Kruglov and Starobogatov 1993b). The results of our study well correspond to the commonly-accepted concept of M. glutinosa . Shell of this species is very fragile, semi-pellucid and, in a living animal, it is completely covered by the reflected mantle. Shell shape is almost globose, with greatly expanded aperture and very diminished spire (in some specimens, it is almost invisible).
The structure of the copulatory apparatus of M. glutinosa , as is described by various authors ( Hubendick 1951; Kruglov and Starobogatov 1985b; Jackiewicz 1998), is virtually indistinguishable from that of the genera Ampullaceana and Peregriana . However, the length of the spermathecal duct is different (long in Myxas , very short or almost absent in Ampullaceana and Peregriana ).
The range of M. glutinosa covers Europe (except of the southern and northern parts), the Urals, Western and Central Siberia ( Khokhutkin et al. 2009; Welter-Schultes 2012; Vinarski et al. 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Myxas glutinosa (O.F. Mueller , 1774)
Vinarski, Maxim V., Aksenova, Olga V. & Bolotov, Ivan N. 2020 |
Amphipeplea dupuyi
Nilsson 1822 |
Amphipeplea mabillei
Nilsson 1822 |