Acrocarpus Wight ex Arn., Mag. Zool. Bot. 2(12): 547. 1839.

Bruneau, Anne, de Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci, Ringelberg, Jens J., Borges, Leonardo M., Bortoluzzi, Roseli Lopes da Costa, Brown, Gillian K., Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S., Clark, Ruth P., Conceicao, Adilva de Souza, Cota, Matheus Martins Teixeira, Demeulenaere, Else, de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno, Ebinger, John E., Ferm, Julia, Fonseca-Cortes, Andres, Gagnon, Edeline, Grether, Rosaura, Guerra, Ethiene, Haston, Elspeth, Herendeen, Patrick S., Hernandez, Hector M., Hopkins, Helen C. F., Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau, Hughes, Colin E., Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M., Iganci, Joao, Koenen, Erik J. M., Lewis, Gwilym P., de Lima, Haroldo Cavalcante, de Lima, Alexandre Gibau, Luckow, Melissa, Marazzi, Brigitte, Maslin, Bruce R., Morales, Matias, Morim, Marli Pires, Murphy, Daniel J., O'Donnell, Shawn A., Oliveira, Filipe Gomes, Oliveira, Ana Carla da Silva, Rando, Juliana Gastaldello, Ribeiro, Petala Gomes, Ribeiro, Carolina Lima, Santos, Felipe da Silva, Seigler, David S., da Silva, Guilherme Sousa, Simon, Marcelo F., Soares, Marcos Vinicius Batista & Terra, Vanessa, 2024, Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification, PhytoKeys 240, pp. 1-552 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/330D897C-559F-983D-603E-325E03ACD5E6

treatment provided by

PhytoKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Acrocarpus Wight ex Arn., Mag. Zool. Bot. 2(12): 547. 1839.
status

 

Acrocarpus Wight ex Arn., Mag. Zool. Bot. 2(12): 547. 1839. View in CoL

Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 10 View Figure 10

Type.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Wight & Arn.

Description.

Unarmed evergreen tree, bark pale grey, smooth, brachyblasts absent. Stipules not seen, presumed lacking, at least on mature leaves. Leaves large, bipinnate with a single terminal pinna, leaflets ovate-lanceolate, acuminate (Fig. 7E View Figure 7 ). Inflorescences densely flowered, erect, or drooping racemes, or panicles (Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ). Flowers bisexual, patent or nodding, 5-merous, sepals and petals green, sepals slightly imbricate, petals slightly longer; disk cupular, completely united with the red hypanthium; androecium haplostemonous, stamens five, exserted from corolla (Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ), filaments with basal half green, upper half orange-red, anthers dorsifixed, with introse slits; pollen with a scabrate-punctate sculpture pattern; ovary stipitate, the short style tapered and inflexed to a minute stigmatic pad. Fruits linear to linear-oblong, dehiscent, 2-valved, narrowly winged along upper suture, several- to many-seeded (Fig. 7D View Figure 7 ). Seeds ovate or circular, compressed, testa surface with concentric fracture lines, pleurogram lacking.

Chromosome number.

2 n = 24 ( Goldblatt 1981b).

Included species and geographic distribution.

Monospecific ( A. fraxinifolius ), native to South East Asia (from the Indian subcontinent to China and Indo-China) (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ).

Ecology.

Tropical and subtropical broad-leaved rainforest and evergreen gallery forest.

Etymology.

From Greek, acro - (= summit or top) and carpos (= fruit), most probably alluding to the long-stipitate ovaries and fruits.

Human uses.

Timber of A. fraxinifolius (pink cedar tree) is used to make tea boxes, furniture, and plywood; the species is widely grown as an ornamental and is also used for fodder, gums, and bee forage (for honey) ( Lewis 2005b).

Notes.

Acrocarpus was earlier placed in its own Acrocarpus group of tribe Caesalpinieae ( Polhill and Vidal 1981), but the first molecular phylogenetic analyses based on just a few plastid markers ( Doyle et al. 2000; Bruneau et al. 2001; Kajita et al. 2001) suggested the genus was closely related to Ceratonia (then placed in Cassieae ), a relationship that clearly is supported in the phylogenomic analyses of Ringelberg et al. (2022). A large range of flower size throughout its distribution range formerly led to the recognition of two species.

Taxonomic references.

Hou (1996a); Lewis (2005b).

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Fabales

Family

Fabaceae