Pseudoplangia, Massa, Bruno, 2014

Massa, Bruno, 2014, A new genus of Phaneropterinae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Tettigoniidae) from Central Africa, Zootaxa 3764 (2), pp. 197-200 : 198

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3764.2.7

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A9353293-69D1-4180-996F-23560D4F3BF1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6129746

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3367E073-FFCF-7C76-6ECB-FD80FC490AB1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudoplangia
status

gen. nov.

Pseudoplangia n. gen.

( Figs. 1–15 View FIGURES 1 – 19 )

Type species: Plangia laminifera Karsch, 1896 , here designated

Description. Fastigium of vertex sloping steeply to frons, broader than the first antennal segment, with median sulcus ( Figs 7, 14 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Eyes oval and elongate, moderately prominent ( Figs 3, 6, 14, 15 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Head without fronto-genal carinae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Pronotum without lateral carinae, well-developed humeral excision on the lateral lobes ( Figs 3, 6, 14, 15 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Upper and lower borders of legs densely covered by hairs ( Figs 7, 12, 13 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Fore coxae armed, fore and mid femora and tibiae laterally compressed ( Figs 6, 7 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ); fore femora with ventral spines ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ), fore tibiae with ventral spines and open tympanum on each side ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Mid femora and tibiae with ventral spines, mid femora shorter than pronotum length. Hind femora with ventral spines, hind tibiae with broad-based spines on upper side, small spines on lower side, and three apical spurs on each side ( Figs 1, 2, 12, 13 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Fore and mid tarsi very short. Wings well developed, fore wings slightly shiny and shorter than hind wings ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Male tenth abdominal tergite unmodified, sub-genital plate without styli ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Ovipositor well developed, clearly up-curved, with fine teeth ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ).

Diagnosis. The general aspect is similar to that of the gen. Plangia Stål, 1873 , but it differs remarkably in the vertex width, in the shape of eyes, that in Plangia are oval but not elongate, in the presence of broad-based spines on the hind tibiae, in the length of mid legs, that in Plangia are longer than pronotum length, and in the shape of fore and mid legs, that are very much laterally compressed ( Figs 16, 17 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). In Plangia the fastigium of vertex is less broad than in Pseudoplangia , fore and mid tibiae are not so compressed, hind tibiae have small and not broad-based spines, and styli, even if very small, are present in the sub-genital plate of the male. Eurycorypha Stål, 1873 has oval and more elongate eyes, fronto-genal carinae, very broad fastigium of the vertex and frons, mid legs longer than pronotum length, and much pronounced pronotum borders ( Figs 18, 19 View FIGURES 1 – 19 ). Plangiodes Chopard, 1954 also has fronto-genal carinae and is very similar to Eurycorypha in most other characters, but has a narrower fastigium. Finally, Plangiopsis Karsch, 1889 is easily recognizable, because it has closed tympana on inner side of fore tibiae.

Etymology. After its faint resemblance with the African genus Plangia .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

SubOrder

Ensifera

Family

Phaneropteridae

SubFamily

Phaneropterinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF