Dryopomorphus bishopi Hinton, 1971
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.212677 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6165800 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/354C5D2C-7F09-FFEC-FF18-FE70FCBDF3C3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dryopomorphus bishopi Hinton, 1971 |
status |
|
Dryopomorphus bishopi Hinton, 1971 View in CoL
Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 4 , 9–12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 , 34, 35 View FIGURES 34 – 40. 34 – 39
Dryopomorphus bishopi Hinton, 1971: 295 View in CoL
Type locality: Malaysia: Gombak River N.E. of Kuala Lumpur.
Material studied ( CCB, CKB, NMW): 2 ex. “ Malaysia, Pahang, Cameron HL, Tanah Rata env., small stream crossing path Nr.9 surrounded by primary forest: 9.VI.2001, J.F.Kočiam lgt. ”, 10ex. “ Malaysia, Pahang, Kuala Lipis env., Kg. Melaka, stream in secondary forest, 6.VI.2001, J.F.Kočiam lgt. ”, 7 ex. “ Malaysia, Pahang, Taman Negara, Nusa Camp env., Abai river, 12.VI.2001, J.F.Kočiam lgt. ”, 14 ex. “Prov. PAHANG, 7.2., 1060m (17a) “Gap”-Fraser Hill, MALAYSIA 1992, leg. Schillhammer”, 8ex. “Prov. PAHANG, 8.2., 1km W vom “Gap”, 750–850m (17a), MALAYSIA 1992, leg. Schillhammer”, 3 ex. “Prov. PAHANG (19), Fraser Hill, 10.2., Jeriau W f., 950m, MALAYSIA 1992, leg. Schillhammer”, 2 ex. “Prov. PAHANG (4), 4km S Tanah Rata, 23.1., 1250m, MALAYSIA 1992, leg. Schillhammer”, 5 ex. “ MALAYSIA, 21.I.1992, SELANGOR: Templer Park, N K.L., leg. Jäch (1)”, 4 ex. “ MALAYSIA, 3.II.1992, KELANTAN: 100km Ö Gerik, leg. Jäch (21)”
Diagnosis. Body elongate ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ), ca. 2.00–2.15 times as long as wide (CL/EW), length 3.10–3.70 mm (CL), maximum width 1.50–1.80 mm (EW); color brown to dark brown; median pronotal groove or line absent, lateral pronotal margins strongly explanate; elytral intervals densely setose, very slightly elevated; elytral striae well demarcated, strial punctures smaller on disc, larger on sides. Scutellum as long as wide, subhexagonal. Ninth segments with spiculum gastrale as in Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 . Aedeagus ( Figs. 9–11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ): in ventral/dorsal view, phallobase short and wide, with base without distinct projection; parameres almost 1.5 times as long as phallobase, wide, with subrounded apex; median lobe slightly longer than parameres, narrowed in apical 0.4, widened in basal 0.6, constricted near base, apex rounded; fibula indistinct; ventral sac robust, finely sculptured in apical portion; in lateral view parameres subparallel, narrowed apically; median lobe narrow, sinuate, abruptly widened above base. Ovipositor ( Figs. 34, 35 View FIGURES 34 – 40. 34 – 39 ) with terminal segment short, cylindrical, bearing several types of sensilla; preterminal segment elongate 9.1 times as long as terminal segment, apically with pair of distinct sensilla; basal segment almost 1.3 times as long as preterminal and distal segments combined, fulcrum ventrale finely curved.
Distribution. Known from several localities in the Malaysian Peninsula.
Dryopomorphus hendrichi Č iampor Jr & Kodada, 2006 Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 4
Dryopomorphus hendrichi Čiampor Jr & Kodada, 2006: 71 View in CoL
Type locality: West Malaysia, Johor, Bekok
Material studied: holotype ( NMW): ”West Malaysia / JOHOR, Bekok, path to waterfall, 10.IV.1997, 50– 150m, Balke & Hendrich leg., Coll. HENDRICH”.
Diagnosis. Body oval, less than 2 times as long as wide (CL/EW 1.96), length 3.20 mm (CL), maximum width 1.63 mm (EW), pronotum and elytra distinctly convex in lateral view, setae of the dense pubescence short; median pronotal groove or line absent, lateral pronotal margins strongly explanate; anterior elytral angles subacuminately produced; sublateral pronotal sulci short, less than 0.2 of PL; elytral intervals densely setose, very slightly elevated; strial punctures very small, separated by ca. 3–4 times puncture diameter; scutellum wider than long; shape of the aedeagus (see Čiampor Jr & Kodada 2006); color: head brown, pronotum, elytra, legs and antennae reddish-brown.
Distribution. So far known only from the holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dryopomorphus bishopi Hinton, 1971
Čiampor, Fedor, Čiamporová-Zaťovičová, Zuzana & Kodada, Ján 2012 |
Dryopomorphus hendrichi Čiampor Jr & Kodada, 2006 : 71
Ciampor 2006: 71 |
Dryopomorphus bishopi
Hinton 1971: 295 |