Chiapaheros, Mcmahan, Caleb D., Matamoros, Wilfredo A., Piller, Kyle R. & Chakrabarty, Prosanta, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3999.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4B0B754-1C94-4B61-B612-848804B059A8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5672268 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0B435DB-3645-4B29-9C6E-C59F2D5F6B03 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:D0B435DB-3645-4B29-9C6E-C59F2D5F6B03 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chiapaheros |
status |
gen. nov. |
Chiapaheros View in CoL gen. nov. McMahan and Piller 2015
( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 and 15 View FIGURE 15 )
Inclusive species. Chiapaheros grammodes (type by monotypy)
Diagnosis. Chiapaheros is diagnosed by the presence of thin dark lines (typically seven) running across the side (cheeks) of the head, in combination with an elongated predorsal profile and head. The presence of these lines along the head was one of the key diagnostic characters in the description of this species, and this character also works effectively to separate this genus from all other herichthyin (and heroin) genera. A relatively dorsoventrally oblong black spot is present at the base and center of the caudal peduncle. Chiapaheros is morphologically similar to the “guapotes” of the genera Parachromis and Petenia . In addition to the cephalic lines present in Chiapaheros , this genus can be differentiated from Parachromis and Petenia by the possession of a maxilla that does not extend to the anterior portion of the orbit.
Distribution. Atlantic slope of Mexico and western Guatemala in the Río Grijalva drainage.
Etymology. Gender masculine. The generic name is in recognition of Río Chiapa, the type locality of C. grammodes in Chiapas, Mexico. Additionally, this generic epithet appears to have been recorded in a GenBank submission by the late Gustavo Concheiro-Pérez, with sequence data corresponding to Concheiro-Pérez et al. (2006). This name is also in memory of Gustavo Concheiro-Pérez and his recognition of the distinctiveness of this species.
Comments. The sole member of this genus has been recovered in its own clade in every taxonomically wellsampled phylogeny of neotropical Cichlidae to date. The species was described as a member of Cichlasoma , and besides being regarded as belonging temporarily to ‘ Cichlasoma’ (incertae sedis), this species has never been placed in a separate genus.
Material examined. UMMZ 181815 [n=12 (Paratypes), Mexico: Río Grande de Chiapa], FMNH 93577 [n=9 (Paratypes), Mexico: Río Grijavla].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |