Haplostomella bilobata, Kim & Boxshall, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10530934 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3729879B-FF4E-FF47-FA93-F8B4D6461D8B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haplostomella bilobata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Haplostomella bilobata sp. nov.
( Figs. 112 View FIG , 113 View FIG )
Type material. Holotype ♀ (MNHN-IU-2014-21526), 2 ♀♀ paratypes (MNHN-IU-2014-21527), and 2 ♀♀, 1 ♂ paratypes (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17389) from Apl ẚdẚum sp.; Kerguelen Islands, no other collection data.
Etymology. The specific name alludes to the presence of a pair of lobes on the labrum of the new species.
Description of female. Body ( Fig. 112A, B View FIG ) eruciform, consisting of unsegmented anterior part and short abdomen. Body length 2.04 mm; maximum width 496 μm (across region of leg 4). Anterior half of body slightly tapering anteriorly; cephalosome narrower than metasome, incompletely defined from metasome by posterolateral margins of cephalic shield. Cylindrical metasomal region incorporating leg 5, with 5 pairs of small dorsolateral folds; last pair at level of leg 5 much smaller than anterior 4 pairs. Genital somite completely fused to metasome; paired genital apertures ( Fig. 112L View FIG ) positioned dorsolaterally. Genital operculum bearing 3 teeth inside. Abdomen ( Fig. 112C View FIG ) tapering, 3-segmented, but articulation incomplete between last 2 somites. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 112D View FIG ) about 2.9 times longer than wide (69×24 μm), slightly longer than anal somite, with 5 subequal, naked setae (1 lateral and 4 distal); lateral seta positioned at 63% of ramus length. Egg sac ( Fig. 112B View FIG ) 1.40× 0.34 mm; each egg about 115 μm in diameter.
Rostrum absent. Antennule ( Fig. 112E View FIG ) 100 μm long, 2-segmented; proximal segment with 9 setae; distal seg- ment small, only 17 μm long, subdivided in middle, with 5 setae and 1 short aesthetasc; all setae naked. Antenna ( Fig. 112F View FIG ) indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 1 seta on inner margin, 1 short, blunt seta plus 1 lobate process subdistally, and tipped with 1 seta.
Labrum ( Fig. 112G View FIG ) short and broad, characteristically with pair of large lobes on posterior margin. Mandible and maxillule absent. Maxilla ( Fig. 112H View FIG ) distinctly 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; distal segment shorter and narrower than proximal segment, distally armed with 2 setae; outer seta pinnate, small medial seta naked and located on tip of digitiform process of segment. Maxilliped ( Fig. 112I View FIG ) consisting of 2 segments plus terminal claw; proximal segment broad and unarmed; distal segment as long as wide, with short medial margin and longer outer margin, bearing 1 broad, plate-like process and 1 acute spine near mediodistal corner; terminal claw stout with bicuspid tip.
Leg 1 ( Fig. 112J View FIG ) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopod obscurely defined at medial side, with 1 seta on outer margin; exopod distally bilobed, anterior lobe claw-like, with bicuspid tip, posterior lobe tipped with 1 small seta; endopod large, semicircular, more than twice as wide as exopod, and ornamented with rows of minute spinules. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 112A, K View FIG ) as rudimentary lobe tipped with 2 small setae.
Description of male. Body ( Fig. 113A View FIG ) narrow, cyclopiform, clearly segmented, with distinct prosome-urosome division. Body length 809 μm. Maximum width of body 205 μm across third pedigerous somite. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites. Urosome ( Fig. 113B View FIG ) 6-segmented, consisting of fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite as long as wide. Four abdominal somites 50× 70m 50×61, 36×50, and 23×43 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 113C View FIG ) rectangular, 2.24 times longer than wide (38×17 μm), armed with 6 setae (1 small outer, 1 dorsal, and 4 broad distal).
Rostrum absent. Antennule 7-segmented; armature on segments uncertain due to many setae missing. Antenna as in female. Labrum, mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( Fig. 113D View FIG ) 2-segmented; proximal segment short and unarmed; distal segment 1.5 times longer than wide, with 1 spine subdistally and 1 small lobe at mediodistal corner; terminal claw strongly curved, with bicuspid tip.
Legs 1-4 ( Fig. 113 View FIG E-H) biramous, consisting of coxa, basis, exopod, and endopod. Coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta; basis of leg 1 additionally with inner distal spine. Exopods 3-segmented in all swimming legs. Endopods 1-segmented in leg 1, but 3-segmented in legs 2-4. All setae on swimming legs geniculate proximally, and all spines fringed with broad membranes bilaterally. Endopod of leg 1 and third exopodal segment of leg 2 with bicuspid outer distal corner. Third exopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 with tricuspid outer distal corner.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 113B View FIG ) represented by free exopod tipped with 2 unequal setae. Leg 6 represented by 1 seta on distolateral apex of genital operculum.
Remarks. Species of ealçstçmella seldom bear any lobes on the labrum in the female. The only known exception is eK magellanẚca ( Chatton & Brément, 1910) in which the labrum bears 2 pairs of lobes, as illustrated by Chatton & Brément (1910). Therefore, eK bẚlçbata sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other species of the genus by the possession of a single pair of lobes on the female labrum. Other diagnostic features of the female of e. bẚlçbata sp. nov. include: (1) the abdomen is 3-segmented, a feature shared only with e. australẚensẚs Gotto, 1970; (2) the antennule is distinctly 2-segmented, which is a unique feature of the new species; (3) the mandible is absent, a feature shared only with e. reducta Ooishi & Illg, 1977; and (4) the maxilla is distinctly 2-segmented and armed with 2 setae on its distal segment, a feature shared only with e. bçrealẚs. The combination of these diagnostic features serves to characterize the new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.