Haplostoma depressum, Kim & Boxshall, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5047132 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3729879B-FF7F-FF6A-FA93-FCE1D6861DA7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haplostoma depressum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Haplostoma depressum sp. nov.
( Figs. 100 View FIG , 101 View FIG )
Type material. Holotype ♀ (MNHN-IU-2009-5190), 4 ♀♀ paratypes (MNHN-IU-2014-21515), and 2 ♀♀ para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17385) from Aplẚdẚçpsẚs pyrẚfçrmẚs (Herdman, 1886); Kerguelen, MD42 - SIBEX cruise, RV “Marion Dufresne”, Stn 4/CP25 (53°11’S, 74°05’E), depth 285-375 m, MNHN coll., 14 January 1985. GoogleMaps
Additional material. 4 ♀♀ (MNHN-IU-2014-21516) from Aplẚdẚum fuegẚense Cunningham, 1871; Kerguelen, no other locality data; 7 ♀♀ in A. pyrẚfçrmẚs, SSE Kerguelen Is., MD04 -BENTHOS cruise, R. V. “Marion Dufresne”, Stn DC 275 (49°58’S, 70°29’E), depth 234 m, Boury-Esnault coll., 15 March 1975 GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The body of the new species is dorsoventrally depressed, hence its name.
Description of female. Body ( Fig. 100 View FIG A-C) eruciform, slightly depressed dorsoventrally, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and small genitoabdomen. Body length 1.91 mm in dissected specimen ( Fig. 100B View FIG ); maximum width 740 μm across last metasomite and maximum dorsoventral depth 542 μm. Cephalosome distinctly narrower than metasome, metasome gradually broadening posteriorly, obscurely segmented in dorsal and ventral views ( Fig. 100A, B View FIG ), but metasomites distinctly defined by dorsal and ventral constrictions ( Fig. 100C View FIG ). Compound last metasomite consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen ( Fig. 100D View FIG ) as long as wide (262×258 μm), 2-segmented; anterior somite subcircular, with traces of 2 suture lines on dorsal sur- face; small posterior somite (free abdomen) distinctly defined from anterior somite, wider than long in contracted specimen ( Fig. 100D View FIG ), but longer than wide in relaxed specimen ( Fig. 100E View FIG ). Caudal ramus ( Fig. 100F View FIG ) strongly tapering, armed with 2 setae (1 dorsal and 1 on outer margin) and 2 distal spines. Distal spines (ventral and dorsal) on caudal ramus unequal; ventral spine smaller and simple; larger dorsal spine bifurcate, with pointed dorsal and blunt ventral branches; ventral branch invariably ornamented with 1 or 2 minute spinules subdistally.
Rostrum as small, semicircular anterior protuberance on cephalosome. Antennule ( Fig. 100G View FIG ) 3-segmented; articulation incomplete between 2 distal segments; armed with 2, 2, and 13 small setae on first to third segments, respectively; one seta on second segment consisting of extremely swollen proximal half and slender distal half. Antenna ( Fig. 100H View FIG ) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 2.6 times longer than wide (43×16 μm), as long as proximal, armed with 4 simple spines, proximal 2 smaller than distal 2; all spines distinctly articulated at base.
Labrum ( Fig. 100I View FIG ) bearing 4 broad lobes on posterior margin, lateral lobes longer, prominent, medial lobes short. Labium well-developed, located posterior to labrum. Mandible ( Fig. 100J View FIG ) distinctly 2-segmented; tapering proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 1.8 times longer than wide, tipped with 2 equal setae. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( Fig. 101A View FIG ) 4-segmented; broad first segment unarmed; second segment also wider than long, bearing 2 leaf-like setae; short third segment unarmed; fourth segment with 1 small seta distally; terminal claw unequally bifurcate.
Legs 1-4 each consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopods lacking outer seta. Exopods incompletely articulated from protopods. Endopods prominent, semicircular, indistinctly defined from protopods. Exopod of leg 1 ( Fig. 101B View FIG ) armed with 1 seta and 4 simple spines, proximal 2 spines smaller than distal 2. Exopod of leg 2 ( Fig. 101C View FIG ) armed with 1 seta and 3 simple spines; spines becoming larger from proximal to distal. Exopod of leg 3 ( Fig. 101D View FIG ) armed with 1 seta and 2 simples spines. Leg 4 shaped and armed as leg 3.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 101E View FIG ) short, wider than long, strongly tapering towards blunt apex; armed with 1 subdistal and 2 distal, small setae. Leg 6 ( Fig. 101F View FIG ) 1 small spine, 2 unequal, spiniform processes, and 1 small setule on genital operculum; 5 internal dentiform elements present near leg 6.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. The combination of armature elements on the exopods of legs 1-4 of e. depressum sp. nov. is 5, 4, 3, and 3, as in e. albẚcatum, e. dentatum Ooishi & Illg, 1977, e. elegans Ooishi & Illg, 1977, e. mẚnutum, and e. eruca. eaplçstçma depressum sp. nov. can be clearly distinguished from those five species as well as all other congeners by the three following features: (1) the caudal ramus is armed with 2 spines and 2 setae; (2) the labrum bears 4 lobes on the posterior margin; and (3) the mandible is 2-segmented. Although the second feature is shared with e.
ambẚguum, the 4 lobes on the labrum of the latter species are equally weak, unlike the combination of 2 large lateral and 2 weak medial lobes in the new species.
RV |
Collection of Leptospira Strains |
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |