Oepikodus Lindström, 1955
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1383 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/37439A20-CB35-FF23-FEF9-FA5EFA03F981 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Oepikodus Lindström, 1955 |
status |
|
Type species. Oepikodus smithensis Lindström, 1955 .
Remarks. Revision of the original form species concept ( Lindström, 1955) led to recognition of a trimembrate apparatus consisting of prioniodiform, oepikodiform, and oistodiform elements ( Lindström, 1971; Lindström, in Ziegler, 1975; Lindström, in Ziegler, 1977; Bergström & Cooper, 1973; van Wamel, 1974). Subsequently, Sweet (1988) and Johnston & Barnes (2000) interpreted the genus as consisting of a quinquimembrate apparatus incorporating three morphotypes of ramiform S elements . Further recognition of two pastinate (Pa and Pb) elements (Stouge & Bagnoli, 1988; Albanesi, in Albanesi et al., 1998) and four morphotypes of ramiform S (Sb1, Sb2, Sc, and Sd) elements ( Repetski, 1982) imply a seximembrate or septimembrate apparatus for the genus, including pastinate Pa and Pb, makellate M, and ramiform S elements . In a more recent revision (Stewart & Nicoll, in press; Nicoll & Ethington, in press), Oepikodus was defined as consisting of a septimembrate apparatus, including pastinate Pa and Pb, makellate M, and quadriramate or modified quadriramate S elements . Nicoll & Ethington (in press) suggested that Oepikodus can be distinguished from Prioniodus (and Baltoniodus ) mainly on the basis of the morphology of their Sa elements , those of Oepikodus being quadriform alate, while Sa elements in the other two genera are triform alate.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.