Rhyacophila furcicauda, Kawase, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5447.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A9842EC-F3D2-4839-9731-AA79A27B25CB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11119203 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/385587AA-F726-1174-FF4C-C63EFD0CA06C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhyacophila furcicauda |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhyacophila furcicauda sp. nov.
( Figs 7A–7J View FIGURE 7 , 9D View FIGURE 9 )
Rhyacophila sp. 2 ( clemens gr.): Kawase & Morita 2010, 36.
Diagnosis. The male genitalia of R. furcicauda sp. nov. are unique among known species in the R. clemens Species Group in that the apical segment of each inferior appendage is bifurcate ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ) (those of the other species are not bifurcate). The female genitalia of R. furcicauda sp. nov. are similar to those of R. parvicauda sp. nov. in having thick setae densely on the lateral surface of segment VIII but can be distinguished from the latter by the characters given in the diagnosis for R. parvicauda .
Adult. Length of each forewing: male 6.1–7.2 mm (mean = 6.7, SD = 0.39, n = 8), female 6.7 mm (n = 1). General morphology and coloration similar to those of R. clemens , but wing venation similar to R. inazui ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ), root of fork I on each forewing clearly longer than that of fork II.
Male genitalia ( Figs 7A–7F View FIGURE 7 ). Segment IX dorsal half longer than ventral half in lateral view ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ), widely trapezoidal in dorsal view ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ); apicodorsal lobe extruded posterad, trapezoidal in dorsal view ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ), angular in lateral view ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Preanal appendages absent. Segment X reverse L-shaped in lateral view, composed of vertical part and horizontal part: vertical part tall in lateral view ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ); horizontal part oval in dorsal view ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ), apically bent upwards in lateral view ( Figs 7A, 7B View FIGURE 7 ); apical hinged process with pair of long finger-like lobes, parallel, directed posterodorsad ( Figs 7A–7D, 7F View FIGURE 7 ), with pair of round anteroventral corners and small protrusion between them ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ). Anal sclerites composed of two pairs of lobes, each long and rectangular, but apex of each ventral pair obliquely truncate in lateral view; these two pairs of lobes with common internal root ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Apical band well developed, semi-oval in lateral view, broadly surrounding anus and root of anal sclerites ( Figs 7B, 7F View FIGURE 7 ). Tergal band connecting base of apical band to dorsum of phallobase ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Basal segment of each inferior appendage setose, short, thick, nearly rectangular, posterior half gradually thicker in lateral view ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Apical segment of each inferior appendage bifurcate in lateral view ( Figs 7A, 7E View FIGURE 7 ), covered with hair-like setae sparsely laterally, with dense short spine-like setae on posteromesal margin of ventral fork ( Figs 7A, 7D, 7E View FIGURE 7 ). In phallic apparatus, phallobase short; aedeagus forming narrow tube with sclerotized ventral plate ( Figs 7B, 7C View FIGURE 7 ); ventral plate horizontal and long and tongue-shaped, posterior margin with small triangular protrusion apicomesally in ventral view ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ). Parameres absent.
Female genitalia ( Figs 7G–7J View FIGURE 7 ). Segment VIII annular, dorsal margin almost straight in lateral view ( Fig. 7G View FIGURE 7 ); pair of ventral ridges widely separated anteriorly, running subparallel posteriorly ( Fig. 7H View FIGURE 7 ); with many darkly pigmented and thick setae laterally, with fine pale short setae between ventral ridges ( Figs 7G, 7H View FIGURE 7 ); pair of apodemal rods reaching to posterior end of segment VI. Segment IX membranous, with pair of apodemal rods dorsolaterally, extending into abdominal segment VI. Vaginal apparatus simple; posterior process sclerotized, dorsal margin slightly convex in lateral view ( Fig. 7I View FIGURE 7 ), apparatus oval in ventral view ( Fig. 7J View FIGURE 7 ); processus spermathecae membranous ( Figs 7I, 7J View FIGURE 7 ).
Immature stage. Unknown.
Holotype. Male (in alcohol), Yuzurio-cho, Higashi-ômi-shi, Shiga Pref., Honshu, Japan, 35°4’40” N 136°23’44”E, alt. 370 m, 31.v–26.vi.2009, N. Kawase ( LBM1410012653 View Materials ). GoogleMaps
Paratypes. Honshu : Mie: 2 males, Okumano, Iga-shi, 9.vi–22.vi.2012, H. Morita ( LBM1410012654– 1410012655 View Materials ) . Wakayama: 2 males, Kôya-ryujin Skyline, Ryujin-mura , 28–29.v.2004, (SPMN-IS-59800–59801); 2 males, 1 female, same data, T. Hattori ( LBM1410012656–1410012658 View Materials ) .
Other specimens examined. Honshu: Mie: 1 male, Okumano, Iga-shi , 26.v–9.vi.2012, H. Morita (NKa) ; 1 male, Hobo-cho, Kumano-shi , 33°57’N 136°12’E, 31.v.2006, N. Kawase (NKa) GoogleMaps . Nara: 1 pupa (male), Kannohgawa, Totsukawa-mura , 11.vi.2005, S. Kobayashi ( SPMN) ; 1 male, Kitozumi, Tenkawa-mura , 22.vii.2021, H. Iketake ( HI) .
Etymology. The species name “furcicauda ” (= fork tail) is a noun in apposition referring to the bifurcate apical segment of each inferior appendage in male genitalia.
Distribution and biology. Rhyacophila furcicauda sp. nov. was collected from only Suzuka Mountains and Kii Mountains in Kinki district, central Japan ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ). Adults of this species were collected near streamside by sweeping or using a Malaise trap in late May to July.
Japanese name. Nimata-nagare-tobikera.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |