Cybaeus somesbar Bennett, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5100.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D783E41-8DF8-4D3C-9853-38C41CCEBB30 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6313363 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/39264D0A-FFE8-AD00-FF6F-63DDFE66FA36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cybaeus somesbar Bennett |
status |
|
Cybaeus somesbar Bennett View in CoL
Figs 33–36 View FIGURES 33–36 , 40–42 View FIGURES 37–42 , 49 View FIGURE 49
Cybaeus somesbar Bennett View in CoL in Copley et al. 2009: 393, figs 99–101, 113. World Spider Catalog 2021.
Type material examined. U.S.A.: California: Holotype female. Siskiyou County, 1 mile south of Somes Bar , 22.viii.1959, V. D. Roth & W.J. Gertsch ( AMNH) . Paratypes. Specimens and locality data in Copley et al. 2009.
Other material examined. U.S.A.: California: Humboldt. 1♂, Slide Creek, 7.4 mi. W of Hwy. 96, Six Rivers National Forest , 2400′, 9.ix.1992, D. Ubick & J. Boutin ( CAS). One other non-paratype specimen and its locality data are in Copley et al. 2009 .
Diagnosis. The male of C. somesbar is unlikely to be confused with any of the known males of the other species in the septatus group. It is distinguished from the male of C. viator spec. nov. by the slightly angular but rounded profile of its patellar apophysis ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–36 ), the angular truncated tip of the distal arm of the tegular apophysis and the strongly concave posterior margin of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis ( Figs 35–36 View FIGURES 33–36 ) (versus in the male of C. viator spec. nov. the patellar apophysis has a strongly angular profile [ Figs 43–44 View FIGURES 43–46 , 47 View FIGURES 47–48 ], the tip of the distal arm of the tegular apophysis is rounded, and the posterior margin of the proximal arm is angular [ Figs 45 View FIGURES 43–46 , 48 View FIGURES 47–48 ]). Separating the male of C. somesbar from those of C. chauliodous and C. septatus is discussed in the diagnoses of those two species.
The female of C. somesbar is unique among septatus group females in having long convoluted spermathecal stalks which make three 180° bends between the spermathecal heads and bases ( Figs 41–42 View FIGURES 37–42 ). It shares very small inconspicuous atrial openings ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 37–42 ) with the female of C. viator spec. nov. ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37–42 ) but the spermathecal stalks in that species are very short and almost linear ( Figs 38–39 View FIGURES 37–42 ). Distinguishing the female of C. somesbar from those of C. chauliodous , C. lockeae spec. nov., and C. septatus is discussed in the diagnoses of those three species.
Description. As in diagnosis. Other descriptive characters are presented here. Ventral tibia I macrosetae 2–1p– 2–1p–1p(or 0, or 2). Femora unbanded in females, very lightly banded ventrally in the single known male.
Male (n=1). Patellar apophysis ( Figs 33–34 View FIGURES 33–36 ) antero-prolaterally directed, length about equal to width of palpal patella, with solitary large medially located peg seta isolated from three setae arranged around the tip of the apophysis. Embolus ( Figs 35–36 View FIGURES 33–36 ) very thin, describing a simple curve. Tip of proximal arm of tegular apophysis ( Figs 35–36 View FIGURES 33–36 ) sharply acuminate in ventral view, angular in retrolateral view
Measurements (n=1). CL 2.28; CW 1.58; SL 1.14; SW 1.09.
Note: We have associated the Slide Creek male with the previously described females of C. somesbar because it was collected in the same general area as the other California specimens, only 20 to 50 km separate the Slide Creek locality from the other California localities for this species, and no other species of Cybaeus in the area is known only from females.
Female: See Copley et al. 2009.
Distribution and natural history. ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ) Northwestern California (Klamath Mountains and lower Klamath/Salmon Rivers drainage) and adjacent southwestern Oregon. Apparently absent from the coast. The single male was collected in September.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.