Rushia californica ( Fall, 1907 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-78.1.53 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13243617 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A222641-0013-D10B-FF7C-47ECBF62F954 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rushia californica ( Fall, 1907 ) |
status |
|
Rushia californica ( Fall, 1907)
( Figs. 2E, F View Fig )
Carebara californica Fall 1907: 254 .
Literature Records: A dubious state record was listed by Leng (1920: 239).
Digital Records: Six records from Pima and Cochise counties and a genus-only record for Coconino County ( GBIF 2023).
Specimens Examined : “ USA, AZ, Coconino Co., // 1.5mi S. Hwy 40 & 3.8 mi // W. Flagstaff (off FSR 151) // 35.1795, -111.7553; 17- // 19.vii.2007; D&G POllOck” (2 MAJC) GoogleMaps ; “ Rustlers Park // Chiricahua Mts. // Cochise Co. Ariz. // 8500 ft. VI2565 || COllectOrs: // J. H. DavidsOn // J. M. DavidsOn // M. A. Cazier ” (1 ASUHIC) GoogleMaps ; “ USA: AZ: Cochise Co. // Huachuca Mts. ; 0.8 rd. // mi. SW Reef; 31.4238 // 110.2991; July 1524 // 2018; VFlight intercept //trap; W.B. Warner ” (2 ASUHIC) .
Notes. Specimens were identified using Fall (1907) and Pollock (2015). Most digitized collection records were identified by DAP. The species Rushia brevicollis ( Fall, 1907) , described from New Mexico, may be a synonym, but the type has not been examined by us.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rushia californica ( Fall, 1907 )
Johnston, M. Andrew, Warner, William B. & Pollock, Darren A. 2024 |
Carebara californica
Fall, H. C. 1907: 254 |