Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole, 2002

Alvarado, Mabel & Palacio, Edgard, 2021, Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole, 2002 (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Metopiinae) in South America, Zootaxa 5040 (2), pp. 265-282 : 266-267

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5040.2.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B10750F1-0CD9-4A61-B071-29989FB307B3

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A23BA1C-FFF2-2E21-2697-FFFFFDECFB06

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole, 2002
status

 

Genus Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole, 2002 View in CoL View at ENA

Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole 2002: 149 View in CoL . Type species: Forrestopius judyae Gauld & Sithole View in CoL , by original designation (MNCR).

Diagnosis. The genus Forrestopius can be distinguished from other metopiines by the combination of the following characters: (1) upper part of face weakly projected between bases of antennae ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ); (2) frons with a carina surrounding the toruli ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ) and sculpture, laterally next to toruli, generally striate ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ); (3) fore wing with areolet open; (4) protibial spur antero-dorsally without a comb and velum, and postero-dorsally with a comb ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ).

Redescription. Head. Mandibles bidentate (rarely tridentate— Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ), weakly tapering towards apex, ventrally straight, without ventral flange; apex not twisted; with upper tooth longer than lower tooth; abductor swelling next to upper corner; condylar ridge straight, not interrupted or turned upwards; surface next to condylar ridge with a concavity along margin, generally reaching to 0.7× of mandible length. Labrum not exposed when mandible closed (rarely broadly exposed, as in F. nasutus sp. nov. — Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ). Palp formula 5:4, maxillary palpomeres slen- der. Clypeus transverse, its apical margin straight or weakly convex; without a preapical transverse ridge parallel to margin; without a sulcus upwards from the base of mandible. Face and clypeus moderately convex (tentorial pit rarely located in a raised area, as in F. otavalo sp. nov.); with subocular sulcus ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ); upper part of face produced upwards into a small, more or less convex projection between bases of antennae (this projection not reaching median ocellus), dorsally forming a weak crest medially. Antenna with third and fourth flagellomeres 0.7–0.9× as long as wide (rarely 1.3× as long as wide, as in F. wankawillka sp. nov.). Frons with a carina surrounding the toruli, laterally striate next to torulus. Occipital carina vestigial or ventrally absent, if ventrally absent not curved inwards. Postgenal bridge not projected.

Mesosoma . Pronotum polished with band of hairs along upper margin, without a longitudinal concavity parallel to anterior margin, upper edge evenly convex; with a ventral pronotal pit in the lower corner, generally with a wrinkle projecting upwards from pocket like structure; epomia absent or with only upper part present. Propleuron not swollen. Mesoscutum weakly convex; notaulus impressed anteriorly; without a concavity next to lateral margin between notauli and tegula. Scutoscutellar groove broad and smooth. Scutellum tapering towards distal end, without lateral longitudinal carinae. Mesopleuron moderately swollen with or without a small and shallow sternaulus; epicnemial carina complete, converging to anterior margin of pleuron near its upper end, where it sharply folds back reaching subalar prominence; subalar prominence convex to weakly flattened; mesopleural suture smooth below speculum; posterior transverse carina present laterally and centrally (absent in front of coxae). Metapleuron almost flat, polished, bare or with few isolated setae; ventrally with a weak submetapleural carina which expands into a lobe anteriorly. Propodeum with lateral longitudinal carina complete and strong, rarely weak; lateromedian longitudinal carinae generally present (absent, in F. wankawillka sp. nov.), strong, more or less parallel to each other, absent between posterior transverse carina and propodeal insertion; anterior transverse carina absent; posterior transverse carina complete, rarely absent; propodeal spiracle elliptical, large, extending most of the way between lateral longitudinal and pleural carinae. Fore and mid trochantellus undifferentiated. Protibial spur antero-dorsally without a comb and without velum, postero-dorsally with a comb ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). Foreleg tarsomeres 2–4 wider than long, pretarsal claws simple. Mid tibia with two spurs, outer spur slightly longer than inner spur. Hind tibia without a comb in inner margin; with two spurs, outer spur shorter than inner spur. Hind tarsomere 5 of females, on the inner side, without a hooked lobe. Fore wing with areolet open, cua-a far distal to base of Rs & M; 2 m-cu with one bulla. Hind wing with distal abscissa of Cu 1 joining cu-a closer to 1 A than to M.

Metasoma. Tergite I with lateral and lateromedian longitudinal carinae quite well developed, spiracle 0.3–0.4 of way along tergum; sternum I short, ending anterior to spiracle; laterotergite II 0.1–0.3× as wide as long; laterotergite III 0.3–0.6× as wide as long; laterotergites of metasomal segments III and IV of female and male separated by a crease; metasomal terga VI–VIII without setae on distal margin; metasomal tergite VIII of female entirely flat; female with sterna IV–VI weakly sclerotized with membranous areas; female with sternum VI slightly wider than long and distally more or less straight.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Ichneumonidae

Loc

Forrestopius Gauld & Sithole, 2002

Alvarado, Mabel & Palacio, Edgard 2021
2021
Loc

Forrestopius

Gauld I. D. & Sithole R. & Subfamily Metopiinae & In & Gauld, I. D. & Godoy, C. & Ugalde Gomez, J. A. 2002: 149
2002
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF