Contracaecum osculatum (Rudolphi, 1802) Baylis, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.10.004 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B248318-FFF8-FFE7-9279-6447C380E741 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Contracaecum osculatum |
status |
|
4.2. Ecological data on C. osculatum View in CoL View at ENA sp. D and C. osculatum sp. E
The results here presented confirm the presence of the two Antarctic species of anisakid nematodes of the genus Contracaecum (Raillet and Henry, 1912) , [ C. osculatum sp. D and C. osculatum sp. E ( Orecchia et al., 1994)] as the most prevalent anisakid species recovered from the fish hosts captured in the Ross Sea. The two species were found in the same individual fish hosts, showing a strict simpatry and sintopy. However, a significant difference in their relative proportions in the fish species was observed. This finding could be related to the ecological and feeding habits of the fish host species. The fish species examined in the present study show trophic niche separation ( Brenner et al., 2001), as demonstrated also by a study using stable carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) isotope analyses. Indeed, species of the fish genus Trematomus were differentiated in both C and N isotopic signature ( Rutschmann et al., 2011), indicating respectively a different habitat use and a distinct trophic level. T. bernacchii is the most benthic species of the genus Trematomus ( La Mesa et al., 2004) ; it has been also defined as a shallow benthic species, primarily feeding on benthic prey ( Gon and Heemstra, 1990). Therefore, T. bernacchii is considered as a generalist species, which relies on a wide range of preys that are more or less associated with the sea bottom ( La Mesa et al., 2004). On fish from the Ross Sea area, La Mesa et al. (2004) reported that bivalves were the main food of T. bernacchii , followed by polychaetes, and amphipods ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Our result showed that in T. bernacchii the species C. osculatum sp. E prevailed over C. osculatum sp. D, which was rarely seen in that fish species ( Tables 3 and 4). Further, we found that small sized T. bernacchii (<25 cm) seems to be scarcely infected by Contracaecum larvae (authors personal observation). Another benthic notothenioid, T. hansoni , showed similar low infestation levels as observed in T. bernacchii ( Table 3), but it had a preponderance of C. osculatum sp. D (65.0% in 1993 ‾ 1994 sample, and 70.2% in 2011 ‾ 2012 sample; Table 4, Fig. 2 View Fig ). The observed difference in the relative proportions of the two species of Contracaecum spp. could be explained by a different feeding behaviour and feeding habits of these two fish species ( Fig. 2 View Fig ).
T. hansoni View in CoL , despite sharing the benthic life style of T. bernacchii View in CoL , includes more pelagic items in its diet ( Eastman and Sidell, 2002). La Mesa et al., 1997, report that stomach contents of T. hansoni View in CoL specimens collected in Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea) showed a mainly piscivorous (mainly juveniles) diet, with fish eggs as secondary food items, and on several benthic organisms as polychaetes and decapods ( La Mesa et al., 1997). Its food spectrum thus mainly comprises benthic organisms that are more or less associated with the substratum ( La Mesa et al., 1997).
T. newnesi View in CoL is considered part of cryopelagic community organism ( Andriashev, 1970), and it's often associated with the under surface of the ice. The species can be defined as a frequent plankton feeder in the water column and as an occasional benthic feeder on the substratum (reviewed in Barrera-Oro, 2002); its diet in fact includes both Euphausiacea View in CoL and more benthic Amphipoda, Isopoda, Polychaeta and some Mollusca ( Daniels, 1982). A marked plasticity in feeding habits and diet diversity of T. newnesi View in CoL has been found in areas of seasonal sea-ice coverage in the high Antarctic zone ( La Mesa et al., 2000) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Both C. osculatum View in CoL species showed high prevalence of infection in T. newnesi View in CoL , with almost all the examined fish infested ( Table 3), and showing mean intensity (Im) values that were higher in T. newnesi View in CoL than in the other notothenoids ( Table 2). T. newnesi View in CoL , with its intermediate characteristics and its peculiar cryopelagic habit, feeding both in the water column on krill, and on substratum benthic organisms (Amphipoda, Polychaeta, and Isopoda), showed a balanced mixed infection with the two Contracaecum species (48.4% C. osculatum View in CoL sp. D and 51.6% C. osculatum View in CoL sp. E, Table 4), feeding on both intermediate hosts for the two Contracaecum species ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). In a study based on the stable isotope method to investigate trophic niches of Antarctic fishes, Cherel et al., 2011 reports that the intermediate d 13 C value of T. newnesi View in CoL is in agreement with the semipelagic life style of the species ( Gon and Heemstra, 1990).
Whereas, Ch. hamatus View in CoL , with a low d 13 C signature, confirms its epibenthic life style, feeding mainly on pelagic prey ( Gon and Heemstra, 1990). The infestation levels by both C. osculatum View in CoL species in the channichtyid Ch. hamatus View in CoL were remarkably higher than the levels recorded in the notothenioid fish species ( Table 3, Fig. 2 View Fig ). A 100% prevalence (P) was recorded in samples from both Antarctic expeditions for the Contracaecum View in CoL larvae of the two species, being present in all the examined Ch. hamatus View in CoL specimens, and showing extremely high mean intensity values (A = 135.8 for C. osculatum View in CoL sp. D and A = 25.9 for C. osculatum View in CoL sp. E recorded in 2011/2012, and A = 102.0 for C. osculatum View in CoL sp. D and A = 17.6 for C. osculatum View in CoL sp. E recorded in 1993 ‾ 1994) ( Table 3). The subsample of Contracaecum spp. larvae obtained from Ch. hamatus View in CoL genetically identified showed a prominent presence of C. osculatum View in CoL sp. D (83.0% recorded in the subsample of 1993 ‾ 1994, and 84.0% on 2011 ‾ 2012) ( Table 4). Piscivorous fish, such as many larger channichtyds, obviously play an important role as parathenic accumulators of Contracaecum View in CoL s.l. larvae (Kloser ¨et al., 1992). In the Ross Sea, Ch. hamatus View in CoL is the most abundant and eurybathic channichtyid ( Eastman and Hubold, 1999; Vacchi et al., 1999), with benthic behaviour, but also capable of vertical migration to feed on pelagic prey ( Eastman and Sidell, 2002). Mintenbeck et al., 2012, defines Chionodraco spp. as demersal fish that only occasionally move in the water column. The large predatory icefish probably show a heavier helminth burden compared with the Trematomus spp. because they are likely more exposed to infection through predation on multiple intermediate hosts, such as invertebrates and smaller fish (see La Mesa et al., 2004).
Thus, considering the relative frequencies observed of the two species of Contracaecum occurring in the different fish hosts, each one characterized by its feeding ecology and diets, some conclusion can be drawn regarding the possible life cycles of C. osculatum sp. D and C. osculatum sp. E in the Antarctic food web ( Fig. 3a and b View Fig , respectively). C. osculatum sp. D seems to be associated more with fishes, such as Ch. hamatus and T. hansoni , characterized by benthopelagic habits, and predating on other small fishes and Antarctic krill (presumably Euphausia crystallorophias , the most frequent euphausiid present in the Ross sea). C. osculatum sp. D could include, in its life-cycle, a planktonic intermediate host, such as Euphausia crystallorophias ( Fig. 3a View Fig ). Instead, C. osculatum sp. E showed its higher relative proportion in T. bernacchii , which is a fish specialized in predation of strictly benthic organisms. This finding seems to suggest that a possible first intermediate host of C. osculatum sp. E could be represented by benthic organisms ( Fig. 3b View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Contracaecum osculatum
Mattiucci, Simonetta, Cipriani, Paolo, Paoletti, Michela, Nardi, Valentina, Santoro, Mario, Bellisario, Bruno & Nascetti, Giuseppe 2015 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
C. osculatum
Baylis 1920 |
T. hansoni
Boulenger 1902 |
T. bernacchii
Boulenger 1902 |
T. hansoni
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |
T. newnesi
Boulenger 1902 |