Spinomantis mirus, Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4656.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DCC9B72-74D2-49A0-ACC4-279FE01C0D3A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B69878C-FFEE-AD64-FF7E-FACA67D2C52E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Spinomantis mirus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Spinomantis mirus sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:73F4C4DA-B47B-4EDC-9BD0-8A3B0ED08BEA
Remark. This species has previously been referred to S. sp. Ca12 by Vences et al. (2017).
Holotype. ZSM 818 View Materials /2014 ( ZCMV 14764 ), adult male ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , no picture in life available), from a primary forest along a stream in Pic d’Ivohibe Special Reserve (-22.49833, 46.95917, 1,695 m above sea level), southeastern Madagascar, collected on 10–11 November 2014, by A. Rakotoarison. M.C. Bletz, D. Edmonds & F. Randrianasolo.
Paratypes. UADBA-A 61689 ( ZCMV 14765 ) , adult male, UADBA-A 61668 ( ZCMV 14752 ) , ZSM 817 View Materials / 2014 ( ZCMV 14753 ) and ZSM 819 View Materials / 2014 ( ZCMV 14770 ), adult females ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), all collected by the same collectors during the same dates . UADBA-A 61668 and ZSM 817 View Materials /2014 were collected at a lower elevation (-22.49667, 46.95644, 1,506 m). UADBA-A 61689 and ZSM 819 View Materials / 2014 were collected at the same locality data as the holotype .
Diagnosis and comparisons. The new species is assigned to the genus Spinomantis (Mantellidae) based on (1) phylogenetic affinities to S. bertini and S. beckei , (2) presence of intercalary elements between ultimate and penultimate phalanges of fingers and toes (verified by external shape of digits), (3) presence of distinct femoral glands of type 1 ( Glaw et al. 2000) in males, (4) outer metatarsal tubercle present, (5) maxillary teeth present, and (6) adults living along streams in rainforest.
Within Spinomantis , the new species is distinguished by a combination of the following characters: (1) body size, adult male SVL 24 mm and adult female SVL 25−27 mm; (2) lighter color of the flank with distinct mottling of whitish and dark brown and tri-color banding on the legs; (3) thick frenal stripe; and (4) a dorsal color pattern with large and distinct brown dots. Furthermore, it differs from all other Spinomantis species by a substantial divergence of 8.1–9.8% uncorrected pairwise distance in a fragment of the 16S gene.
Spinomantis mirus sp. nov. can be distinguished from other Spinomantis View in CoL species not belonging to the S. bertini View in CoL species complex by numerous morphological characters. Based on comparative data from Glaw & Vences (2007) and Cramer et al. (2008), S. mirus sp. nov. differs from the fully arboreal species S. aglavei View in CoL , S. fimbriatus View in CoL , S. massi View in CoL , S. nussbaumi View in CoL , S. peraccae View in CoL , S. phantasticus View in CoL , and S. tavaratra View in CoL by terrestrial habits and a smaller body size (SVL 24−27 vs. 31−56 mm); from S. aglavei View in CoL , S. fimbriatus View in CoL , S. massi View in CoL , S. phantasticus View in CoL , and S. tavaratra View in CoL by a smooth skin without dermal spines or flaps; from S. elegans View in CoL by a much smaller body size (SVL 24−27 vs. 50−60 mm) and ab- sence of a clearly delimited ocellated dorsal pattern (vs. presence); from S. guibei View in CoL by smaller body size (SVL 24−27 vs. 29−40 mm) and a mainly brown (vs. green) color pattern; from S. microtis View in CoL by smaller body size (SVL 24−27 vs. 30−48 mm), much smaller terminal discs on fingers and toes, and smooth skin; and from S. brunae View in CoL by smaller size (SVL 24−27 vs. 32−35 mm) and absence of gold and black mottling dorsally (vs. presence).
In relation to other species of the S. bertini View in CoL species complex, S. mirus sp. nov. differs from both S. bertini View in CoL and S. beckei View in CoL in the lighter color of the flank with more distinct mottling of whitish and dark brown, tri-color banding on the legs (dark brown, light yellow and light brown), and a dorsal color pattern with more distinct brown dots. Spinomantis mirus sp. nov. further differs from S. bertini View in CoL by having a slightly larger body size (female SVL 25−27 vs. 21−25 mm, male measurements not available for S. bertini View in CoL ), a more muted pale yellowish-green color on dorsum, legs and head, a dorsolateral line with light yellow borders, a frenal stripe more whitish (vs. greenish-yellow), and more extensive and distinct mottling on the venter. Spinomantis mirus sp. nov. differs from S. beckei View in CoL by having slightly smaller femoral glands (ratio FGL/SVL 0.14–0.22 vs. 0.19–0.24 mm), a lighter colored and spotted (vs. dark and mottled) coloration on the dorsum, more distinct banding on the legs, and by having a thicker frenal stripe ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Description of the holotype. Specimen in good condition, tongue excised as tissue sample. Snout−vent length 24.3 mm, for further measurements see Table 1. Slender body; head longer than wide, and as wide as body; rounded to somewhat angular snout in dorsal and lateral views, protuberant nostrils inserted laterally, closer to the tip of snout than to eye; distinct canthus rostralis, arched; concave loreal region; distinct tympanum, rounded, its diameter 62% of eye diameter; small supratympanic fold; no vomerine teeth, reduced maxillary teeth; large choanae, oval. Slender arms; single subarticular tubercles; no finger webbing; relative length of fingers 1<2<4<3; finger discs enlarged; nuptial pads absent. Slender hindlimbs; tibiotarsal articulation reaches the tip of the nostril when hindlimb is adpressed along the body; single subarticular tubercles; lateral metatarsalia partly connected; inner metatarsal tubercle distinct, outer metatarsal tubercle not recognizable; reduced webbing, formula 1(1), 2i (1.5), 2e(1), 3i (2.5), 3e(2), 4i (3), 4e(3), 5(2); relative length of toes 1<2<3=5<4. Skin on the upper surface smooth, without folds or ridges. No distinct enlarged tubercles in the cloacal region; ventral skin smooth. Small femoral glands of type 1 sensu Glaw et al. (2000), distance between femoral glands 1.2 mm.
After five years in preservative, the head appears rather uniformly brown with some darker brown spotting or mottling. The dorsum has mottling similar to the head but a lighter tone. There is a moderately distinct dark, almost black, dorsolateral stripe with a thin white line bordering the top, which runs from the nostril to the inguinal region. The flanks appear lighter in color than the dorsum. The limbs retain a distinct banding pattern.A thin white line runs along the upper lip. Ventrally, brownish with numerous white dots and small markings on chest and venter, markings are less evident on the chin and pectoral region. Ventral sides of thighs, shanks, and feet are brown with contrasting white blotches. Femoral glands are brown, contrasting with the mottled appearance of the thighs. Ventral sides of hands and feet are uniformly brown.
The coloration in life of the holotype is unknown because it was not photographed in the field.
Variation. The paratype specimens ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) are one male and three females (see Table 1 for additional measurements) and strongly resemble the holotype. Males are smaller than the females ( SVL 24 vs. 25‒27 mm) and have femoral glands but do not show other obvious sexual dimorphism in external morphology or coloration. Compared to the holotype, the paratypes vary in the size and shape of mottling (resembling more dots than mottling) both dorsally and ventrally, the distinctness of banding on the legs, and the intensity of the white border of the dorsolateral line. In life, individuals had a pale yellowish green dorsal and head coloration with well-defined brown dotting; brown dotting appeared smaller on the head; legs had tricolor banding with dark brown, pale yellow and light brown; banding on the arms was less distinct; thick pale greenish-white frenal stripe and dark brown dorsolateral line with light greenish-yellow borders were present; flank was mottled with white and brown; venter had varying degrees of white and brown mottling; pale greenish-yellow iris matching the color of the borders of the frenal stripe ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Natural history and distribution. Spinomantis mirus sp. nov. was found in primary forests both during day and night along small rivers. Males were not calling when collected and vocalization remains unknown. The species is only known from Pic d’Ivohibe Special Reserve ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (masculine form) meaning “surprising.” The new species is named after the unexpected events that occurred during its finding, such as encounters with police that confused the team with cattle thieves, and tiresome hiking after searching in vain for the trails left by previous expeditions.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Spinomantis mirus
Sabino-Pinto, Joana, Rakotoarison, Andolalao, Bletz, Molly C., Edmonds, Devin, Glaw, Frank & Vences, Miguel 2019 |
Spinomantis mirus
Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences 2019 |
S. mirus
Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences 2019 |
S. mirus
Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences 2019 |
Spinomantis mirus
Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences 2019 |
Spinomantis mirus
Sabino-Pinto & Rakotoarison & Bletz & Edmonds & Glaw & Vences 2019 |
S. beckei
Vences, Kohler and Glaw 2017 |
S. beckei
Vences, Kohler and Glaw 2017 |
S. nussbaumi
Cramer, Rabibisoa and Raxworthy 2008 |
S. tavaratra
Cramer, Rabibisoa and Raxworthy 2008 |
S. tavaratra
Cramer, Rabibisoa and Raxworthy 2008 |
Spinomantis
Dubois 1992 |