Protaphycus shuvalikovi Simutnik, 2022

Simutnik, Serguei A., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. & Vasilenko, Dmitry V., 2022, Protaphycus shuvalikovi Simutnik gen. et sp. nov. (Chalcidoidea, Encyrtidae, Encyrtinae) from Rovno amber, Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91, pp. 1-9 : 1

Protaphycus shuvalikovi Simutnik sp. nov.

Figs 1 , 2

Material.

Holotype, SIZK ZH-98, 1♀, Zhovkini , Varash District, Rovno Region, Ukraine; Rovno amber, late Eocene. The inclusion is in a yellow and clear piece of amber in a shape of irregular triangular prism (ca. 22 × 10 × 12 × 6 mm). All body parts are preserved.

Syninclusions.

ZH-93 Coleoptera :? Anthicidae ; ZH-94 Diptera : Chironomidae ; ZH-95 Coleoptera : Scirtidae ; ZH-96 Coleoptera , 2 Diptera : Sciaridae , Cecydomyiidae ); ZH-97 Diptera : Chironomidae ; ZH-98 4 Diptera : Sciaridae , Limoniidae , Chironomidae , Nematocera ; ZH-99 Hymenoptera : Mymarommatidae , Diptera : Chironomidae , Collembola : Entomobryomorpha ; ZH-100 2 Diptera : Psychodidae , Chironomidae ; ZH-101 Hymenoptera ; ZH-102 Limoniidae ; ZH-103 Diptera : Sciaridae ; ZH-104 Diptera : Sciaridae ; ZH-105 Diptera : Empididae ; ZH-106 Diptera : Chironomidae ; ZH-107 Thysanoptera ; ZH-108 Diptera : Chironomidae ; ZH-109 Diptera : Brachycera ; ZH-110 Diptera : Chironomidae ; ZH-111 Thysanoptera : Thripidae ; ZH-112 2 Diptera : Hybotidae , Chironomidae .

Etymology.

The species is named in memory of our colleague Vladimir Borisovich Shuvalikov, an entomologist, geneticist, and teacher.

Description.

Female. Habitus as in Fig. 1A, B . Body length 0.6 mm.

Coloration and sculpture. Body, tegula, legs, gaster dorsally and ventrally black; clava darker than F6 (Fig. 2A ); surface of frontovertex, mesoscutum, scutellum and axillae smooth, shiny (probably due to the presence of a thin layer of air), but without visible metallic shine; mesoscutum with rare black setae (Fig. 1A ), ovipositor sheaths pale yellow; head, thorax, legs, and gaster shallow reticulate, but surface of head only sparsely punctate, some cells of frontovertex with one convex point (Fig. 1A ).

Head. Hypognathous, slightly wider than thorax in dorsal view, about 1.5 × as broad as long; occipital margin sharp, but not carinate (Fig. 1B ); eyes clothed in sparse setae 2 × as long as diameter of eye facet (Fig. 1A ), with inner orbits parallel; frontovertex only slightly longer than broad, almost one-third head width; ocelli in right-angled triangle, posterior ocelli elliptical in dorsal view, OOL about one-third posterior ocellus diameter (Fig. 1A, B ); OCL slightly shorter than posterior ocellar diameter; OOL:POL:LOL:OCL about 1:8:5:2; eye reaching occipital margin; facial cavity, location of toruli, and interantennal prominence not visible in holotype.

Antenna. Geniculate, 11-segmented (1:1:6:3); scape long, not widened (Fig. 1B ); pedicel conical, about as long as F1-F4 combined, longer than any segment of funicle, all funicular segments transverse, F1-F4 very small and subequal (Fig. 1A, B ), mps not visible; F6 twice as broad as long (Fig. 2A ); width of flagellomeres increases toward apex; at least, all segments of clava with mps (Fig. 2A ); clava large, only slightly shorter than funicle (Fig. 1A ); about 2 × as long as broad, with small oblique truncation (sensor region) on rounded apical segment (Fig. 2 A ), wider than F6; flagellum and clava clothed in very short setae.

Mesosoma. Pronotum almost vertical, with small transverse dorsal surface (Fig. 1A, B ); mesoscutum broader than long, flat, notaular lines present as grooves (Fig. 1A, B : n) at extreme anterior part of mesoscutum; axillae transverse-triangular with anteromedial angles contiguous (Fig. 1A ); scutellum flat, about as long as mesoscutum.

Wings. Fully developed, forewings wide, with round apex; linea calva with filum spinosum, covering setae along basal margin of linea calva present, well developed (Fig. 1A,B : cs); area basal to covering setae bare and looking like speculum (Fig. 1A ); hyaline break (unpigmented area) present; proportions of forewing venation, shape of parastigma, and setation of linea calva as in Figs 1A,B , 2A ; marginal vein 2 × as long as broad and about 1.5 as long as postmarginal (Fig. 1A,B ); stigmal vein with long narrow uncus, consisting row of uncal sensilla; seta marking apex of postmarginal vein of fore wing not longer than others on the marginal and postmarginal veins; setae of marginal fringe short.

Legs. Normal in size, alike polygonal reticulate; tarsi 5-segmented, mesotibial spur slightly longer than mesobasitarsus, both relatively short (Fig. 2A ).

Gaster. Polygonal reticulate equal dorsally and ventrally; apex of hypopygium sharp, distinctly reaching way past apex of syntergum (Fig. 2C : hyp, syn); gonostyli (Fig. 2C : v3) separated from apex of hypopygium; lateral margin of hypopygium bare, without row of setae; shape of hypopygium, location of cercal plates, and cercal setae as in Fig. 2B, C .

Male. Unknown.

The earliest known Encyrtidae include one female and four males were ascribed to five different genera from middle Eocene Sakhalinian amber ( Simutnik 2021; Simutnik et al. 2021a). They did not have the filum spinosum and differed significantly from the both extant and late Eocene European encyrtids. To date, 16 species from 14 extinct genera are described from the Rovno, Baltic, and Danish ambers. Half of them, including the Protaphycus shuvalikovi , had the filum spinosum and, putatively, belong to Encyrtinae . The most of the known European amber Encyrtidae differ from the majority of extant ones by the subapical position of the cerci, the relatively long marginal vein of the forewing, a distinctly swollen but not triangular parastigma, a short radicle, and by a seta marking the apex of the postmarginal vein that is not any longer than others on this vein. The Sulia glaesaria Simutnik, 2015 with a unique abdominal structure, a largest of the known extinct members of the family, was described from Danish amber and then reported from Rovno amber ( Simutnik 2015a; Simutnik et al. 2021b).

A comparative morphological analysis of the paleontological data allowed tracing character changes in some morphological structures in members of the family from the middle Eocene, through the late Eocene, to the present ( Simutnik 2021). However, further analysis is required to determine the place of these fossil on the phylogenetic tree.

Figures

Figure 1. Protaphycus shuvalikovi gen. et sp. nov., holotype female A body, dorsal, (cs - covering setae; fs - filum spinosum; n - notaular line; pmv - postmarginal vein; pst - parastigma; u - uncus) B body, dorsolateral, (p - pedicel). Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 2. Protaphycus shuvalikovi gen. et sp. nov., holotype female A body, posteroventral (cl - clava, ms - mesotibial spur) B body, posteroventral (cers - cercal setae, sp - spiracle on the lateral plate of the Mt 8) C gaster, posteroventrolateral (c - cercus, hyp - hypopygium - black arrow indicates the apex of the hypopygium ventraly, syn - syntergum, v 3 - ovipositor sheaths). Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A, C); 0.1 mm (B).