Primocerioides regale Violovitsh, 1985
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4196.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68A88A77-E760-4293-BE95-AA2785DE3C0C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6084089 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3D0E232F-FF8C-591A-7AAA-FD3D7755F845 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Primocerioides regale Violovitsh, 1985 |
status |
|
Primocerioides regale Violovitsh, 1985 View in CoL
Figs 51 View FIGURES 49 – 55. 49 – 52 , 114, 115 View FIGURES 114 – 117 , 122, 123 View FIGURES 122 – 129 , 130, 131 View FIGURES 130 – 137 , 138 View FIGURES 138 – 140 , 141–144 View FIGURES 141 – 144 , 145 View FIGURES 145 – 147 , 151 View FIGURES 151 – 156 , 171 View FIGURES 169 – 172
Primocerioides regale Violovitsh, 1985: 95 View in CoL . Type locality ‘ Yugoslavia, near Belgrade' [HT ♂ ZIN, lost?]. Sphiximorpha hiemalis Ricarte, Nedeljković and Hancock, 2012: 18 View in CoL . Type locality Greece, Lesvos [HT ♂ HMUG] syn. nov. Sphiximorpha hiemalis: Speight (2013) View in CoL .
Redescription. MALE ( Figs 114 View FIGURES 114 – 117 , 122 View FIGURES 122 – 129 ). Body length: 14.8 mm; wing length: 10.5 mm. Head ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 137 ). Face hardly protruding antero-ventrally without tubercle and very strongly concave below antennae. Head 1.9 times wider than face just below the antennae; length of eye contiguity 0.53 times as long as length of frons; angle of eyes at eye contiguity 145o. Face with characteristic yellow and black colour pattern; genae with anterior and posterior black vitta from eye margin to mouth edge, hypostomal bridge anterior margin black posterior part yellow; face with 4 black maculae medially centred around a yellow oval macula; a black fascia at base of frontal prominence. Frons with yellow posterior fascia. Vertical triangle and ocellar triangle black. Dorsal surface of head capsule yellow, posterior of ocellar triangle narrowly yellow. Frontal prominence 0.44 times as long as wide; relative length of pedicel is as 1.8: 1: 2.5. Antennae orange; arista white pilose.
Thorax. Scutum black with yellow macula on postpronotum and notopleuron, and a yellow lateral vitta anterior of scutellum; with white pollinose maculae medially from the transverse suture. Pleuron black with one yellow macula on posterior part of posterior anepisternum. Pile long and white, on scutum mixed black and white, some black pile on ventral part of anepimeron; ventral half of anterior anepisternum with pile nearly as long as pile on adjacent part of dorsal surface of head capsule. Scutellum entirely yellow. Legs. Coxae black, all other parts red-brown. Pile on legs long and white; pile on apico-posterior part of femora longer; metatrochanter without setulae. Mesofemur with broad flattened area antero-basally ( Fig. 145 View FIGURES 145 – 147 ); metatrochanter with weak sulcus and narrow rim laterally ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ). Metatibia without appendix on apico-ventral part, elongate; metafemur elongate ( Fig. 151 View FIGURES 151 – 156 ). Wing. Hyaline except for brownish anterior 1/2 to spurious vein and along vein CuA. Vein R4+5 straight, with short appendix into cell r4+5. Cross-vein r-m slightly curved. Membrane covered in microtrichia, except anterobasal 2/3 of cell cup and posterior half of alula; alula 3.0 times longer than wide. Abdomen. Black and yellow coloured. Length of tergite I: II: III: IV is as 1: 3.8: 3.7: 3.9. Width of yellow fascia medially: length of tergite of respectively tergite II, III and IV as 1: 3.5, 1: 4.7 and 1: 3.3. Tergite II wider than long, anterior part most narrow; length of tergite II: width of tergite II at respectively anterior: posterior as 1: 1.2: 1.4. Tergite II with broad triangular yellow maculae on antero-lateral corner, broadly separated, ratio of black between maculae and width of tergite anteriorly 1: 1.6; fascia on tergite II medially concave, gradually narrowed towards lateral margin; fascia on tergite III nearly straight; fascia on tergite IV medially concave, gradually narrowed towards lateral margin. Tergite IV weakly emarginated and with grey-yellow triangular pollinose maculae medially. Sternites II–IV with posterior straight yellow fascia. Genitalia. Epandrium with rather narrow ventral rim ( Figs 141, 142 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ); in dorsal view, cerci elongate, semi-circular shaped, with triangular appendix apico-medially ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ), pile about twice as long as width of cerci; surstylus bi-lobed, dorsal lobe long and broadly elongate only slightly narrowed medially, ventral lobe small semi-circular with membranous basal part ( Fig. 141 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ); surstylar apodeme elongate and rectangular shaped, separated in two sclerotized parts ( Fig. 144 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ); hypandrium ( Figs 141, 142 View FIGURES 141 – 144 ) with very broad base and slightly narrower apex; with short and broad lingula; apex medially with narrow and sharp tooth; superior lobe semicircular shaped, articulating with hypandrium; aedeagus with short and broad baso-ventral projection, apex with three projections, dorsally and ventrally short and rounded, medially somewhat longer and rectangular.
FEMALE ( Figs 115 View FIGURES 114 – 117 , 123 View FIGURES 122 – 129 ). Body length: 13.9 mm; wing length: 10.4 mm. Similar to male, except for normal sexual dimorphism and the following characters. Head ( Fig. 131 View FIGURES 130 – 137 ). Head 1.8 times wider than face just below the antennae. Frontal prominence 0.39 times as long as wide; relative length of pedicel is as 2.2: 1: 3.2. Gena predominantly brown-yellow, only anterior part with black vitta from eye margin to mouth edge. Face with two brown round maculae laterally along eye margin. Dorsal surface of head capsule yellow, posterior of ocellar triangle only very narrowly black. Antennae orange, scape and pedicel slightly darker. Legs. Procoxa ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49 – 55. 49 – 52 ). Wing. Alula 3.1 times longer than wide. Abdomen. Length of tergite I: II: III: IV: V is as 1: 3.4: 3.2: 3.3: 1.7. Width of yellow fascia medially: length of tergite of respectively tergite II, III, IV and V as 1: 3.6, 1: 3.9, 1: 3.9 and 1: 3.5. Tergite II wider than long, anterior part most narrow; length of tergite II: width of tergite II at respectively anterior: posterior as 1: 1.2: 1.6. Ratio of black between maculae on tergite II and width of tergite II anteriorly 1: 1.6.
Material examined. Holotype of Sphiximorpha hiemalis : 1 Ƌ: “ Greece: Lesvos / nr Agiassos / 27.ii – 10.iii 2006 / [leg] E.G. Hancock ”, “Huntarian Mus / GLAHM / Entry No. 417”, “ 150472 ”, “ HOLOTYPE / Sphiximorpha hiemalis / Ricarte, Nedeljković & Hancock, 2012 ” [red label, handwritten], ( HMAG) . Additional material: 1 ♀ (IRSNB).
Distribution ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 169 – 172 ). Cyprus, Greece (Lesvos), Serbia.
Biology. Adult habitats are streams along forests of Caprinus / Quercus , Quercus frainetto / Q. pubescens and olive orchards. They visit flowers of Pyrus sp. ( Speight 2013). Adults fly from late February to late June.
Discussion. Primocerioides regale was described by Violovitsh (1985) from a male supposedly collected near Belgrade, in the Former Republic of Yugoslavia (today, Serbia) . The holotype was not found in expected repository collections such as ISEA, ZIN and the Natural History Museum in Belgrade, Serbia . The occurrence of P. regale in Europe is neglected by subsequent authors (e.g., Peck 1988; Dirickx 1994; Radenković 2008; Speight 2013; Ricarte et al. 2012). However, the holotype of S. hiemalis fits to the concept of Primocerioides sensu Shannon (1927b) by having a very short frontal prominence, a non-constricted base of abdomen and pilose eyes. Moreover, the holotype of S. hiemalis fits to the original description of P. regale , except for the antenna colour: in the holotype of P. regale , the scape and pedicel are brown and the basoflagellomere yellow, while in the holotype of S. hiemalis all antennal segments are yellow. Based on the morphological similarities, we propose S. hiemalis as a junior synonym of P. regale . We do not consider it wise to designate a neotype for P. re g al e as it is unclear whether the original type is lost.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Primocerioides regale Violovitsh, 1985
Steenis, Jeroen Van, Ricarte, Antonio, Vujić, Ante, Birtele, Daniele & Speight, Martin C. D. 2016 |
Primocerioides regale
Ricarte 2012: 18 |
Violovitsh 1985: 95 |