Lorryia meliponarum, Da-Costa & Rodighero & Silva & Ferla & Blochtein, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4652.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:97E3C49C-A9DF-418F-A7C6-2B2CE59D68E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5936915 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/403D87CD-FF84-FFF1-EE9A-FD0C010DF947 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lorryia meliponarum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lorryia meliponarum n. sp.
( Figs. 1–7 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURES 5–6 View FIGURE 7 )
Diagnosis. Dorsal and ventral shields with serrated setae, including trichobothria. Serrated setae on legs I-IV (except tc ’, tc ” and ft ’ of leg I). Setae d bifurcated. Dorsal ornamentation mostly striated, type Tydeus , with longitudinal striae between ro, la and bo. Empodial hooks absent.
Description. Adult female (n = 9)—Body of medium size, oval ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Length of idiosoma 223 (216–268), width 139 (122–151).
Dorsum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Dorsum with 13 pairs of setae (ro, la, bo, ex, c1, c2, d, e, f1, f2, h1, h2 and ps1). Dorsum completely covered with striae; prodorsum with longitudinal striae between ro, la and bo ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A-C). Striation between setae d transverse in the form of a “U” ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Striation between f1, f2, h1 and h2 transverse ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ). Eyes absent. All dorsal setae serrate, not reaching setae in next row (excluding bo). Bothridial setae (bo) filiform. Lyrifissures ia located between setae c1 and d, im situated close to d and e. Lengths of dorsal setae: ro 9 (7–12); la 7 (6–9); bo 42 (35–45); ex 12 (8–18); c1 9 (7–12); c2 12 (7–16); d 9 (7–14); e 11 (9–15); f1 12 (10–15); f2 13 (11–18); h1 12 (11–18); h2 13 (12–20); ps1 12 (10–16). Distances between dorsal setae: ro-ro 18 (18–28); la-la 54 (42–73); bobo 43 (43–58); c1-c1 43 (42–60); c2-c2 108 (100–147); d-d 33 (29–47); e-e 68 (68–99); f1-f1 21 (19–32); f2-f2 52 (49–69); h1-h1 19 (12–24); h2-h2 52 (49–71); ro-la 25 (21–31); c1-d 38 (37–55); d-e 29 (28–40); e-f1 29 (29–43); f1-f2 24 (20–24); h1-h2 21 (17–23).
Venter ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). All ventral setae serrated and completely striated. Longitudinal striae between pt setae, transverse striae between pt, mtα and mtβ. Lyrifissures ih located posteroventrally. Measurements of setae: pt 9 (8–15); mtα 10 (9–15) and; mtβ 10 (8–13). Four pairs of aggenital setae (ag1, ag2, ag3 and ag4) and one pair of pseudanal setae (ps2). Setal lengths: ag1 7 (5–8); ag2 8 (6–12); ag3 5 (5–8); ag4 9 (8–12); g1 4 (3–6); g2 4 (3–7); g3 4 (3–5); g4 3 (1–6); g5 4 (2–6); g6 4 (1–5) and; ps2 12 (8–15) ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Shape of cg organ elliptical ( Fig.3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Gnathosoma ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–6 ). Length 49 (49–59), width 42 (40–49). Gnathosoma visible from above. Subcapitulum with longitudinal striae behind sc1 and sc2. Infracapitular setae simple. Setal lengths: sc1 3 (3–6), sc 2 7 (6–12). Palp 48 (46–59) long, setation 5(+1ω)-2-2 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–6 ), setae d bifurcate. Palp tarsus with eupathidium ρζ semilunar distally ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Palptarsus significantly longer than cheliceral digits. Cheliceral stilettos 17 (10–17) long.
Legs ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A-D). All leg setae serrated (except tc ’, tc ” and ft ’ of leg I). Tarsi I-IV with two claws and hairy empodium but empodial hooks (om) are absent. Chaetotaxy of legs I–IV (tarsus to trochanter): I: 8(+1ω)-3(+1κ)-3- 3-1 ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ); II: 6(+1ω)-2-2-3-1 ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ); III: 5-2-1-2-1 ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ) and; IV: 5-2-1-1-0 Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ). Length of leg I 147 (147–203); leg II 114 (114–165); leg III 135 (115–195) and; leg IV 147 (122–196).
Length of tarsus + apotele I 42 (39–54) and 11 (11–14) width; length of solenidion ωI 7 (6–8); length of seta ft’ 15 (11–16); ft’’ 9 (9–11); length of seta k 3 (2–3); length of ωII 4 (3–5).
Type material. Female holotype, eight female paratypes, as follows : Holotype, six paratypes, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, from nests of T. fiebrigi , September 21, 2018, T. Da-Costa . Two paratype females, Bom Princípio, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, from nest of M. quadrifasciata , October 10, 2018, T. Da-Costa . Female holotype and a female paratype deposited at the Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia , Escola Superior de Agricultura “ Luiz de Queiroz ”, Universidade de São Paulo ( ESALQ / USP), Piracicaba , state of São Paulo, Brazil . Two paratypes were deposited at the Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia , Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul ( PUCRS), Porto Alegre , Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil . Other paratypes were deposited at the Museu de Ciências Naturais ( ZAUMCN), Universidade do Vale do Taquari—Univates , Lajeado , Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil .
Male. not found.
Etymology. The name meliponarum derives from the name of the stingless bee tribe Meliponini .
Remarks. This new species resembles L. obnoxia (Kuznetzov & Zapletina, in Livshitz et al. 1972) , which has short dorsal setae, no empodial hooks and Tydeus striations. Nevertheless, it differs as its dorsal setae are serrated instead of lanceolate, its trichobothria (bo) are serrated instead of smooth and setae d are bifurcated. This new species is also similar to L. oregonensis ( Baker, 1970) as its dorsal setae are serrated and it has Tydeus striations. Nonetheless, it differs because its dorsal setae are short (f1 and f2 do not reach the bases of h1 and h2, respectively) instead of long (f1 and f2 reach the bases of h1 and h2, respectively). In addition, its leg setae are serrated (except tc ’, tc ” and ft ’ on leg I) instead of smooth, its empodium has claws instead of without claws, it has transverse striae between the ventral setae mtα and mtβ instead of in a V-pattern, and solenidion ωI is distinctly less than ½ the width of tarsus I instead of being longer than ½ the width of tarsus I.
USP |
University of the South Pacific |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |