Edessa (Edessa) omopalla, Mendonça & Silva & Fernandes, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5372.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1300D562-3E0B-4F72-933F-8FA7D28F6853 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10167613 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/414B87B5-FF9F-9804-FF63-D8E477CEFB8D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Edessa (Edessa) omopalla |
status |
sp. nov. |
Edessa (Edessa) omopalla sp. n.
( Figs. 37 View FIGURE 37 , 66 A–B View FIGURE 66 , 73 View FIGURE 73 )
Etymology. The name refers to the rounded humeral angles (Gr. omos, shoulder; Gr. palla, ball).
Material examined. Holotype male. BRAZIL, Mato Grosso: Rio Xingu , 7-XI-1964, M. Gosse ( IRSB).
Measurements (n= 1). Total length: 18.2; head length: 1.7; head width: 3.5; pronotum length: 3.8; pronotum width: 13.3; scutellum length: 8.9; scutellum width: 6.9; abdominal width: 11.3; length antennomeres: I: 1.0; II: 1.5; III: 2.0; IV: 3.9.
Diagnosis. Large (18.2 mm). Dorsal body surface green, densely punctured ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ). Ventral surface yellow with transversal brown lines on thorax and abdomen ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Antennae brown ( Fig. 66 A–B View FIGURE 66 ). Pronotum coarse, with concolorous with the surrounding surface punctures ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ). Humeral angles short (1.5 times wider than long); apex with black spot restricted to the angles in dorsal view and restricted to the margin of the angles in ventral view; bent backward ( Fig. 66 A–B View FIGURE 66 ). Scutellum with concolorous with the surrounding surface punctures; apex not reaching the end of coria ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ). Coria with all veins concolorous with the surrounding surface ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ). Connexival segments with concavities almost entirely covered by subrectangular black spots separated by a large yellow median spot ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ), spots extending ventrally, triangular ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Posterolateral angles of connexivum with apices black ( Fig. 66 A View FIGURE 66 ). Ventral surface, thorax with brown lines; dark line of the propleura covering 2/3 of the width of the sclerite ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Evaporatorium concolorous with the surrounding surface, peritreme straight ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Metasternal process ( Figs. 37 F View FIGURE 37 ; 66 B View FIGURE 66 ) with arms of anterior bifurcation straight and laterally well expanded, margin acuminated at apex; anterior bifurcation little excavated receiving fourth rostral segment. Legs brown ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Abdomen with spine of III segment rounded ( Fig. 37 F View FIGURE 37 ). Intersegmental areas covered by narrow brown lines with smudged margins, reaching the lateral spots ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Pseudosutures partially covered by superficial light brown line ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 , dark lines are a deterioration of the exoskeleton). Median longitudinal brown band, suffused, incomplete, restricted to the segment VII ( Fig. 66 B View FIGURE 66 ). Trichobothria one in line with spiracle and the other laterad. Male genitalia, dorsal side of the pygophore with a suffused brown area occupying 1/3 of the surface ( Fig. 37 A–B View FIGURE 37 ). Posterolateral angles of the pygophore developed, projected laterally, apices with spots black ( Fig. 37 A–B, D View FIGURE 37 ). Superior processes of the genital cup rectangular, thick, flattened and coarse in posterior view, continuing ventrally in a crenulate, short and high carina ( Fig. 37 B, E View FIGURE 37 , crenulate carina barely visible). Parameres ( Fig. 37 D–E View FIGURE 37 ) with black margins; anterior lobe subrectangular; dorsal lobe subtriangular with curved apex; posterior lobe subrectangular. Proctiger, posterior face subelliptical ( Fig. 37 D–E View FIGURE 37 ). Ventral rim not setose ( Fig. 37 C View FIGURE 37 ); with expansions undeveloped and concolorous with the surrounding surface ( Fig. 37 C View FIGURE 37 ). Female genitalia. Unknown.
Comments. See comments on E. (E.) nigroacantha sp. n.. Edessa (E.) omopalla sp. n. has the humeral angles more inclined backward than in E. (E.) nigroacantha sp. n..
Distribution ( Fig. 73 View FIGURE 73 ). BRAZIL: Mato Grosso.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |