Pteronidea pseudonotabilis Enslin, 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3790.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8AA1D86-A9C2-422F-B1C1-2C92BFE07966 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5080471 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/417A2844-FFF8-FFD8-B6CD-AAE9FEB0FEB9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pteronidea pseudonotabilis Enslin, 1916 |
status |
|
Pteronidea pseudonotabilis Enslin, 1916
A junior subjective synonym of Nematus (Pteronidea) bohemani Thomson, 1871 , synonymy by Lindqvist (1954: 159).
Types. Pteronidea pseudonotabilis Enslin, 1916: 417–418 . Syntypes ♀, “ Finnland ”. Syntype (?) ♀ “ Karislojo ” (MNCN_Ent 82352, http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.853779), 1 ♀ syntype, ZSM, “Karislojo”.
Discussion. Both, in MNCN and ZSM, specimens are to be found, which were apparently subsequently labeled as “´Type” or “ Paratype ”. The MNCN specimen was labeled by Dusmet. Enslin (1916: 417–418) described only females, and claimed that the larva and the males are unknown. Forsius (1921) noted that the type material was reared in 1909 and 1910, and that he also got males. But obviously, this was unknown to Enslin. Forsius (1921) also noted that he reared the species again in 1919, and described the larva and the male. Therefore, all males, and all specimens labeled “ex larva” in addition to the type label, are very likely not part of the type series. The ♀ specimen from ZSM is currently the only known type specimen with Enslin’s identification label. Perhaps more female syntypes may be found in RFT. A lectotype designation should be made in the course of the revision of this difficult group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |