Tylospilus armatusimilis Brugnera, Paim & Grazia, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4766.1.6 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3ABD266F-875A-415F-B794-D9562EC8CEE0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3804197 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/421B8792-FFF0-6C63-2CC9-7F7A245B8D8B |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Tylospilus armatusimilis Brugnera, Paim & Grazia |
status |
|
Tylospilus armatusimilis Brugnera, Paim & Grazia
Figures 20–22, 24 View FIGURES 17–24 , 28–30, 34–36 View FIGURES 25–36
Holotype. URUGUAY: Colonia ♀, Ruta 21 km 184.5, Piedra de Los Indios , 30.XII.2005, beating Schinus, G. J. Wibmer leg. ( MNHNM).
Paratypes. URUGUAY: Colonia 1♂, Same data as Holotype ( MNHNM); 1 ♀, Ruta 21 km 184.5, Piedra de Los Indios , 25.XII.2002, G. J. Wibmer leg. ( JEE); 1♀, Piedra de Los Indios , 23.XII.2002, G. J. Wibmer leg. ( MZUSP); 3 ♀ 1♂, Ruta 21, km 194, Arroyo San Pedro , 9.II.1989, C. W. & L.O’Brien & G. Wibmer leg ( UFRG); 2 ♀, Ruta 21, km 194, Arroyo San Pedro , 28.XII.1991, G. Wibmer leg. ( JEE).
Diagnosis. Similar to T. nigrobinotatus in general aspects, T. armatusimilis can be recognized by the anterolateral margins of the pronotum concolorous with the pronotal disc; humeral angles shorter and slender, laterally directed ( Figs 20–22, 24 View FIGURES 17–24 ); black spots on the apices of radial veins distinctly smaller than in T. nigrobinotatus ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–24 ), and lateral row of black spots on the urosternites restricted to the anterior margin of each urosternite ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–24 ); females have a well-defined rounded projection on gonocoxites XIII ( Figs 28, 29 View FIGURES 25–36 ), secondary thickening of gonapophyses IX sickle-like ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–36 ), anterior projection of thickening of vaginal intima v-shaped ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–36 ) and capsula seminalis elliptical ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–36 ); in males, the mesial portion of ventral rim slightly concave ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 25–36 ), and superior process of dorsal rim of pygophore subrectangular ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 25–36 ). A differential diagnosis between T. nigrobinotatus and T. armatusimilis sp. nov. is presented on table 1.
Measurements: (n=10). Head length: 1.2 ± 0.10 (1.1–1.5), width: 1.6 ± 0.07 (1.5–1.7); pronotum length: 1.7 ± 0.15 (1.4–1.9), width: 5.55 ± 0.43 (4.7–6.0); scutellum length: 2.7 ± 0.19 (2.3–2.9), width: 2.45 ± 0.18 (2.4–2.8); antennomeres length: I 0.22 ± 0.05 (0.2–0.3), II 0.82 ± 0.5 (0.8–0.9), III 0.65 ± 0.5 (0.6–0.7), IV 0.6 ± 0.0 (0.6–0.6); V 0.5 ± 0.0 (0.5–0.5); labial segments length: I 0.75 ± 0.05 (0.7–0.8), II 0.85 ± 0.04 (0.8–0.9), III 0.58 ± 0.03 (0.5–0.6), IV 0.59 ± 0.08 (0.5–0.6); abdominal length: 3.97 ± 1.07 (3.2–5.8), width: 3.8 ± 0.95 (3.1–5.3); total length: 7.5 ± 0.50 (7.0–8.4).
Etymology. From armatus (Latin) and similis (Latin) in reference to T. armatus described by Thomas (1992), here considered to be a junior synonym of T. nigrobinotatus .
Distribution: Uruguay (Colonia).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |