Cheilodactylus Lacépède
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4585.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A0A847B6-734B-4EA5-8872-271482AE29F2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/43283970-FFF8-0A77-FF56-49F2FEEAFE52 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cheilodactylus Lacépède |
status |
|
Genus Cheilodactylus Lacépède View in CoL View at ENA
( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 )
Cheilodactylus Lacépède, 1803:5 View in CoL [Type-species: Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803 View in CoL , by monotypy].
Chilodactylus Agassiz, 1846:78 , 80 [unjustified emendation of Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803 View in CoL ].
Trichopterus Gronow, 1854:162 [Type-species: Trichopterus indicus Gronow, 1854 , (= junior synonym of C. fasciatus Lacépède, 1803 View in CoL ) by monotypy].
Pteronemus Van der Hoeven 1855:177 [Type-species: Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803 View in CoL (unneeded substitute for Cheilodactylus Lacépède, 1803 View in CoL )].
Etymology. Gender masculine. Derived from the Greek cheilos (lip) for the fleshy lips of these species, and daktylos (finger) for the lower, unbranched pectoral fin rays.
Inclusive species. Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède (type species), C. pixi Smith
Diagnosis. As per family diagnosis.
Habitat and distribution. Both C. fasciatus and C. pixi occur in cooler waters from Namibia, to Natal, South
Africa. These species can be found in shallow, coastal rocky habitats and are common to 30m depth. However, both C. fasciatus and C. pixi have been observed at 97m and 120m, respectively ( Smith & Heemstra 1986). These species generally stay close to the benthos where they hide among rocks and other rubble ( Smith 1980). Tidepools are thought to be an important nursery habitat for juvenile C. fasciatus in South Africa ( Beckley 1985).
Comments. These species range in size from 180mm for C. pixi , to 300mm for C. fasciatus ( Smith 1980) . Both species are primarily benthic invertivores ( Smith & Heemstra 1986, Griffiths & Lechanteur 2003).
Material examined. C. fasciatus , ROM 0 50995 [n=6, South Africa: Port Alfred]; C. pixi , AMS I.37729 [n=5, South Africa: Tsitsikama ] , ANSP 97464 About ANSP [n=1, Mozambique: Maputo Bay], CAS 45331 [n=1 (paratype), South Africa: Algoa Bay ] , USNM 221144 About USNM [n=1 (paratype), South Africa: Algoa Bay ] , USNM 385232 About USNM [n=6, South Africa: Tsitsikama ] .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cheilodactylus Lacépède
Ludt, William B., Burridge, Christopher P. & Chakrabarty, Prosanta 2019 |
Pteronemus
Van der Hoeven 1855: 177 |
Trichopterus
Gronow 1854: 162 |
Trichopterus indicus
Gronow 1854 |
Chilodactylus
Agassiz 1846: 78 |
Cheilodactylus Lacépède, 1803:5
Lacepede 1803: 5 |
Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803
Lacepede 1803 |
Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803
Lacepede 1803 |
C. fasciatus Lacépède, 1803
Lacepede 1803 |
Cheilodactylus fasciatus Lacépède, 1803
Lacepede 1803 |
Cheilodactylus Lacépède, 1803
Lacepede 1803 |